Response-ordering effects: A methodological issue in conjoint analysis

Health Economics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 75-79

  Farrar, Shelley ^a   Ryan, Mandy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Ordering effects

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED KINGDOM;

GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 0032931076     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199902)8:1<75::AID-HEC400>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ryan, M. and Hughes, J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Economics 1997; 6: 261-273.
2. Ryan, M., Scott, A. Farrar, S. et al. Using conjoint analysis in health care: unresolved methodological issues. Health Economics Research Unit Discussion Paper 02/96, University of Aberdeen, 1996.
3. Schuman, H. and Presser, S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, wording and context. London: Sage, 1996.
4. Farrar, S., Ryan, M., Ross, D. and Ludbrook, A. Prioritisation of clinical service developments in a teaching hospital: an application of conjoint analysis. Health Economics Research Unit Discussion Paper No 09/97, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 1997.
5. Adamowicz, W.L. Stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Paper presented to the Agricultural Economics Society Annual Conference, 1994.
6. Hornberger, J.C., Habraken, H. and Bloch, D.A. Minimum data needed on patient preferences for accurate efficient medical decision making. Medical Care 1995; 33: 297-310.
7. Acito, F. An investigation of some data collection issues in conjoint management. Journal of Marketing Research 1977; 16: 26-31.
8. Ryan, M., McIntosh, E. and Shackley, P. Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. Health Economics Letters 1998; 7: 373-378.
9. Scott, A. and Vick, S. Patients, doctors and contracts an application of principal-agent theory to the doctor-patient relationship. Scottish Journal of Political Economy (forthcoming).
10. Greene, W.H. LIMDEP™ Version 7.0. Econometric Software, Inc., NY, 1995.
11. Greene, W.H. Econometric analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1993.