Using guided notes, choral responding, and response cards to increase student performance

International Journal of Special Education

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 1-5

  Blackwell, Ann J ^a   McLaughlin, T F ^a  

^a GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749861416     PISSN: 08273383     EISSN: 08273383     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Adams, D. R., & Fuchs, M. (1986). Using the computer for children with special needs. Momentum, 56, 33-34.
2. Barbetta, P. M., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 111-120.
3. Barbetta, P. M., Heward, W. L., & Bradley, D. M. (1993). Relative effects of whole-word and phonetic-prompt error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 99-110.
4. Carnine, D., & Silbert, J., Kameenui, E.J., & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall/Merrill.
5. Ehrhardt, A. M., Sweeney, W. J., Gardner, R., Greenfield, R., Jones, L. (1993). Using guided notes with academically at-risk high school students during a remedial summer social studies class. [Summary]. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, (pp. 360). Kalamazoo, MI: Society for the Advancement of Behavior Analysis.
6. Gardner, R. III., Bullara, D. T., Heward, W. L., Cooper, J. O., & Sweeney, W. J. (1993, October). Effects of response cards on elementary students' participation and disruptive behavior during whole-class instruction. Paper presented at The Ohio State University Conference on Measurably Superior Instruction, Columbus, OH.
7. Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1987). Direct instruction research: The third decade. Remedial & Special Education, 8(6), 48-56.
8. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunities to respond and student academic achievement. In W. L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
9. Greenwood, C. R., Hart, B., Walker, D. (1994). The opportunity to respond and academic performance revisited: A behavioral theory of developmental retardation and its prevention. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 213-233). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
10. Hamilton, S. L., Seibert, M. A., Gardner, R., III, Talbert-Johnson, C. (2000). Using guided notes to improve the academic achievement of incarcerated adolescents with learning and behavior problems. Remedial & Special Education, 21(3), 133-140.
11. Kamps, D. M., Dugan, E. P., Leonard, B. R., & Daoust, P. M. (1994). Enhanced small group instruction using choral responding and student interaction for children with autism and developmental disabilities. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 99, 60-73.
12. Harmin, M. (1995). Make more time for learning. Learning, 23, 61-64.
13. Heward, W. L. (1994). Three low-tech strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R Gardner III, Sainato, D., Cooper, J. O., Heron, T., Heward, W. L., Eshleman, J., & T. A. Grossi. (Eds.) Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurable superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
14. Heward, W. L. (2003). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (7th ed). New York: Prentice-Hall.
15. Lazarus, B. D. (1991). Guided notes, review and achievement of secondary students with learning disabilities in mainstream content courses. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 112-127.
16. Lazarus, B. D. (1996). Flexible skeletons: Guided notes for adolescents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(3), 36-40.
17. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E. Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 52-65
18. Narayan, J.S., Heward, W. L., R Gardner III, Courson, F. H., & Omness C. K. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 483-490.
19. Sweeney, W. J., Ehrhardt, A. M. Gardner III, R., Jones, L., Greenfield, R., & Fribley, S. (1999). Educational practices and problems - using guided notes with academically at-risk high school students during a remedial summer social studies class. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 305-319
20. White, D. M. (1991). Use of guided notes to promote generalized notetaking behavior of high school students with learning disabilities. Unpublished masters thesis. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
21. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., Doyle, P. M., Gast, D. L., & Griffen, A. K. (1992). Choral and individual responding during small group instruction: Identification of interactional effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 289-309.