Alternatives to parameter selection for kernel methods

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4131 LNCS - I, Issue , 2006, Pages 216-225

  Muñoz, Alberto ^a   De Diego, Isaac Martín ^b   Moguerza, Javier M ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA STRUCTURES; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

KERNELS; PARAMETER SELECTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM);

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 33749818106     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11840817_23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. O. Bousquet and D.J.L. Herrmann. On the complexity of learning the kernel matrix. In S. Becker, S. Thurn, and K. Obermayer, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 15, pages 415-422. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2003.
2. O. Chapelle, V. Vapnik, O. Bousquet, and S. Mukherjee. Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines. Machine Learning, 46(1/3):131-159, 2002.
3. N. Cristianini, J. Shawe-Taylor, A. Elisseeff, and J. Kandola. On Kernel-Target Alignment, pages 367-373. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
4. J. C. Gower and P. Legendre. Metric and euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3:5-48, 1986.
5. S.S. Keerthi and C. Lin. Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with gaussian kernel. Neural Computation, 15:1667-1689, 2003.
6. G. R. G. Lanckriet, N. Cristianini, P. Barlett, L. El Ghaoui, and M. I. Jordan. Learning the kernel matrix with semi-definite programming. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5(Jan):27-72, 2004.
7. J.-H. Lee and C.-J. Lin. Automatic model selection for support vector machines. Technical report, National Taiwan University, 2000.
8. E. L. Lehmann. NonParametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. McGrawHill, 1975.
9. O. L. Mangasarian and W. H. Wolberg. Cancer diagnosis via linear programming. SIAM News, 23(5):1-18, 1990.
10. J. M. Moguerza, I. Martin de Diego, and A. Muñoz, Improving support vector classification via the combination of multiple sources of information. In Proc. of the IAPR International Workshops SSPR 2004 and SPR 2004, Vol. 3138 of LNCS, pages 592-600. Berlin: Springer, 2004.
11. E. Pȩkalska, R. P. W. Duin, S. Günter, and H. Bunke. On not making dissimilarities euclidean. In Proc. of the IAPR International Workshops SSPR 2004 and SPR 2004, Vol. 3138 of LNCS, pages 1145-1154. Berlin: Springer, 2004.
12. E. Pȩkalska, P. Paclík, and R. P. W. Duin. A generalized kernel approach to dissimilarity-based classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, Special Issue on Kernel Methods, 2(12):175-211, 2001.
13. K. Schittkowski. Optimal parameter selection in support vector machines. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 1(4):465-476, 2005.
14. B. Schölkopf, S. Mika, C. J.C. Burges, K.-R. Müller P. Knirsch, G. Rätsch, and A. J. Smola. Input space vs. feature space in kernel-based methods. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999.
15. J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
16. B. Silverman. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, 1986.
17. L. Vandenberghe and S. Boyd. Semidefinite programming. SIAM Review, 38(1):49-95, 1996.