Enterprise architecture: A social network perspective

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Dreyfus, David ^a   Iyer, Bala ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFRAORGANIZATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCIES; IS ARCHITECTURE; SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; COST ACCOUNTING; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 33749661260     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.155     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. J. W. Ross, "Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages," MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4314-03, vol. Center for Information Systems Research Working Paper No. 335, 2003.
2. C. Sauer and L. P. Willcocks, "The Evolution of the Organizational Architect," Sloan Management Review, pp. 41-49, 2002.
3. J. C. Henderson and N. Venkatraman, "Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations," IBM Systems Journal, vol. 32, pp. 4, 1993.
4. C. Morris and C. Ferguson, "How Architecture Wins Technology Wars," Harvard Business Review, vol. 71, pp. 86-97, 1993.
5. D. McKay and D. Brockway, "Building IT Infrastructure for the 1990s," vol. 9, Nolan, Ed. New York: Norton & Company, 1989, pp. 1-11.
6. G. Richardson, B. Jackson, and G. Dickson, "A Principle-Based Enterprise Architecture: Lessons from Texaco and Star Enterprise," MIS Quarterly, vol. 14, pp. 385-403, 1990.
7. T. A. Byrd and D. E. Turner, "Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: Exploratory analysis of a construct," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 17, pp. 167-208, 2000.
8. N. B. Duncan, "Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure," in Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 12: M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1995, pp. 37.
9. B. Iyer and R. M. Gottlieb, "The Four-Domain Architecture: An approach to support enterprise architecture design.," in IBM Systems Journal, vol. 43: IBM Corporation/IBM Journals, 2004, pp. 587-597.
10. P. Weill and M. Broadbent, Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
11. T. W. Malone and K. Crowston, "The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 26, pp. 87-119, 1994.
12. D. G. Messerschmitt and C. Szyperski, Software ecosystem: understanding an indispensable technology and industry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.
13. G. S. Nezlek, H. K. Jain, and D. L. Nazareth, "An integrated approach to enterprise computing architectures," Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, pp. 82-90, 1999.
14. D. L. Parnas, "On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems Into Modules," Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, pp. 1053-1058, 1972.
15. T. R. Kayworth, D. Chatterjee, and V. Sambamurthy, "Theoretical Justification for IT Infrastructure Investments," Information Resources Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 5-14, 2001.
16. B. R. Allen and A. C. Boynton, "Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility.," MIS Quarterly, vol. 15, pp. 435-450, 1991.
17. L. Gasser, "The Integration of Computing and Routine Work," ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 205-225, 1986.
18. J. A. Zachman, "A framework for information systems architecture.," in IB M Systems Journal, vol. 38: IBM Corporation/IBM Journals, 1987, pp. 454.
19. C. Alexander, Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge,: Harvard University Press, 1964.
20. L. Zhao and K. Siau, "Component-based Development using UML," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 9, pp. 207-222, 2002.
21. E. Yourdon, Modern structured analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Yourdon Press, 1989.
22. C. A. Gunter, "Abstracting dependencies between software configuration items," ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 9, pp. 94-131, 2000.
23. M. Schilling, "Toward a General Systems Theory and its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity," Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, pp. 312-334, 2000.
24. C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.
25. J. Tillquist, J. L. King, and C. Woo, "A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency," MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, pp. 91, 2002.
26. E. Glaeser, H. Kallal, J. A. Scheinkman, and A. A. Shleifer, "Growth in Cities," Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, pp. 1126-1152, 1992.
27. P. Prasad, "Symbolic Processes in the Implementation of Technological Change: A Symbolic Interactionist Study of Work Computerization," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 36, pp. 1400-1429, 1993.
28. M. S. Feldman and J. G. March, "Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 26, pp. 171-186, 1981.
29. R. L. Ackoff, "Management Misinformation Systems," Management Science, vol. 14, pp. 147-156, 1967.
30. H. Simon, "The architecture of complexity," R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, and R. N. Langlois, Eds. Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 2003, pp. viii, 411 p.
31. P. R. Lawrence and J. W. Lorsch, Organization and Environment; Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston,: Division of Research Graduate School of Business Administration Harvard University, 1967.
32. J. G. March, "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, vol. 2, pp. 71, 1991.
33. P. R. Carlile, "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, vol. 13, pp. 442-455.
34. J. R. J. Boland and R. V. Tenkasi, "Perspective Making and Perspective-Taking in Communities of Knowing," Organization Science, vol. 6, pp. 350-372, 1995.
35. R. Nelson and S. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1982.
36. N. S. Argyres, "Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination," Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 28, pp. 337-358, 1995.
37. R. Kling, "Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 12, pp. 61-110, 1980.
38. G. DeSanctis and M. S. Poole, "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, vol. 5, pp. 121-147, 1994.
39. T. J. Pinch and W. E. Bijker, "The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts," in The Social Construction of Technological Systems, W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, Eds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1987, pp. 17-50.
40. S. R. Barley, "Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments," Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, pp. 78, 1986.
41. W. J. Orlikowski, "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, vol. 3, pp. 398-427, 1992.
42. W. J. Orlikowski, "Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations," Organization Science, vol. 11, pp. 404-428, 2000.
43. R. Kling, "Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work," Commun. ACM, vol. 34, pp. 83-88, 1991.
44. A.-L. Barabasi, Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing, 2002.
45. M. Akrich, "The De-scription of Technical Artifacts," W. E. Bijker and J. Law, Eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992, pp. 205-224.
46. R. D. Banker, S. M. Datar, C. F. Kemerer, and D. Zweig, "Software complexity and maintenance costs," Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM, vol. 36, pp. 81, 1993.
47. M. Wilson and D. Howcroft, "Re-conceptualising failure: Social shaping meets IS research," European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 11, pp. 236, 2002.
48. J. D. Thompson, Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
49. C. H. Hubbell, "An input-output approach to clique identification," Sociometry, vol. 28, pp. 377-399, 1965.
50. L. Katz, "A new status index derived from sociometric analysis," Psychometrika, vol. 18, pp. 39-43, 1953.
51. B. Uzzi and J. Spiro, "Do Small Worlds Make Big Differences? Artist Networks and the Success of Broadway Musicals, 1945-1989," Forthcoming.
52. S. P. Borgatti, "The Key Player Problem," in Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: workshop summary and papers, R. L. Breiger, K. M. Carley, P. Pattison, and N. R. C. U. S. C. o. H. Factors, Eds. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences Press, 2003.