Granger causality test on R&D spatial spillovers and productivity growth

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 13, 2006, Pages 857-861

  Lu, Wen Cheng ^a   Chen, Jong Rong ^b   Wang, Chia Ling ^b  

^a ALETHEIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; PANEL DATA; PRODUCTIVITY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SPILLOVER EFFECT;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIWAN;

EID: 33749656811     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: 14664291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504850500425360     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bernstein, JI. (1989) The structure of Canadian inter industry R&D spillovers, and the rates of return to R&D Journal of Industrial Economics, 37, pp. 315-28.
2. Bernstein, JI and Yan, X. (1996) Canadian-Japanese R&D spillovers and productivity growth Applied Economics Letters 3, pp. 763-67.
3. Bottazzi, L and Peri, G. (2003) Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data European Economic Review, 47, pp. 687-710.
4. Branstetter, LG. (2001) Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan Journal of International Economics, 53, pp. 53-79.
5. Engelbercht, H. (1997) International R&D spillovers amongst OECD economies Applied Economics Letters, 4, pp. 315-19.
6. Frantzen, D. (1998) R&D efforts, international technology spillovers and the evolution of productivity in industrial countries Applied Economics, 30, pp. 1459-69.
7. Funke, M and Niebuhr, A. (2005) Regional geographic R&D spillovers and economic growth -- Evidence from West Germany Regional Studies, 39, pp. 143-54.
8. Freeman, C and Perez, C. (1988) Structural crises of adjustment: business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical Change and Economic Theory. (pp. 38-66). New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Grossman, GM and Helpman, E. (1990a) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
10. Grossman, GM and Helpman, E. (1990b) Quality ladders and product cycles Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 557-86.
11. Hurlin, C and Venet, B. (2001) Granger causality tests in panel data models with fixed coefficients. University of Paris IX: Mimeo.
12. Im, KS and Pesaran, MH and Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels Journal of Econometrics, 115, pp. 53-74.
13. Jaffe, AB. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms' patents, profits, and market value American Economic Review, 76, pp. 984-1001.
14. Kao, C and Chiang, MH and Chen, B. (1999) International R&D spillovers: An application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp. 691-709.
15. Levin, A and Lin, CF and Chu, CS. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties Journal of Econometrics, 108, pp. 1-24.
16. Maddala, GS and Wu, S. (1999) Comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp. 631-52.
17. Madden, G and Savage, SJ. (2000) R&D spillovers, information technology and telecommunications, and productivity in ASIA and the OECD Information Economics and Policy, 12, pp. 367-92.
18. Madden, G and Savage, SJ and Bloxham, P. (2001) Asian and OECD international R&D spillovers Applied Economics Letters, 8, pp. 431-35.
19. O'Connell, P. (1998) The overvaluation of purchasing power parity Journal of International Economics, 44, pp. 1-19.
20. Romer, PM. (1990) Endogenous technological change Journal of Political Economy, XCVIII, pp. S71-S103.
21. Taylor, MP and Sarno, L. (1998) The behavior of real exchange rates during the post-Bretton Woods period Journal of International Economics, 46, pp. 281-312.