A reappraisal of the role of abscisic acid and its interaction with auxin in apical dominance

Annals of Botany

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 891-897

  Cline, Morris G ^a   Oh, Choonseok ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abscisic acid; Apical dominance; Auxin; Branching; Branching inhibitor; Decapitated shoot; Helianthus annuus; Ipomoea nil; Solanum lycopersicum; Strain violet

Indexed keywords

ABSCISIC ACID; ARYLACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ABSCISIC ACID; APICAL DOMINANCE; INHIBITOR; PHYTOCHEMISTRY;

ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IPOMOEA NIL; METABOLISM; PLANT; PLANT ROOT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SUNFLOWER; TOMATO;

ABSCISIC ACID; HELIANTHUS; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; IPOMOEA NIL; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; NAPHTHALENEACETIC ACIDS; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ARABIDOPSIS; HELIANTHUS; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; IPOMOEA; IPOMOEA NIL; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PETUNIA; PISUM SATIVUM; SOLANUM;

EID: 33749643151     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl173     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Auldridge M, Block A, Vogel J, Dabney-Smith C, Mila I, Bouzayan M, et al. 2006. Characterization of three members of the Arabidopsis carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase family demonstrates the divergent roles of this multifunctional enzyme family. Plant Journal 45: 982-993.
2. Bennett T, Sieberer T, Willett B, Booker J, Luschnig C, Leyser O. 2006. The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport. Current Biology 16: 553-563.
3. Beveridge C. 2000. Long-distance signaling and a mutational analysis of branching in pea. Plant Growth Regulation 32: 193-203.
4. Booker J, Chatfield S, Leyser O. 2003. Auxin acts in xylem-associated or medullary cells to mediate apical dominance. Plant Cell 15: 495-507.
5. Booker J, Auldridge M, Wills S, McCarty D, Klee H, Leyser O. 2004. MAX3CCD7 is a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase required for the synthesis of a novel plant signaling molecule. Current Biology 14: 1-20.
6. Chatfield S, Stirnberg P, Forde B, Leyser O. 2000. The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 24: 159-169.
7. Cline M. 1996. Exogenous auxin effects on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated shoots. Annals of Botany 78: 255-266.
8. Cline M, Chatfield S, Leyser O. 2001. NAA restores apical dominance in the axr3-1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Annals of Botany 87: 61-65.
9. Dorffling K. 1976. Correlative bud inhibition and abscisic acid in Acer pseudoplatanus and Syringa vulgaris. Physiologia Plantarum 38: 319-322.
10. Eliasson L. 1975. Effect of indoleacetic acid on the abscisic acid level in stem tissue. Physiologia Plantarum 34: 117-120.
11. Emery R, Longnecker N, Atkins C. 1998. Branch development in Lupin angustifolius L. II. Relationship with endogenous ABA, IAA and cytokinins in axillary and main stem buds. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 555-562.
12. Everat-Bourbouloux A, Charney D. 1982. Endogenous abscisic acid levels in stems and axillary buds of intact or decapitated broadbean plant (Vicia faba L.). Physiologia Plantarum 54: 440-445.
13. Faiss M, Zalubilova J, Strnad M, Schmulling T. 1997. Conditional transgenic expression of the ipt gene indicates a function for cytokinins in paracrine signaling in whole tobacco plants. Plant Journal 12: 401-415.
14. Foo E, Bullier E, Goussot M, Foucher F, Rameau C, Beveridge C. 2005. The branching gene RAMOSUS1 mediates interactions among two novel signals and auxin in pea. Plant Cell 17: 464-474.
15. Galoch E, Zielinska M, Burkacka-Laukajtys E. 1989. The effect of decapitation on the levels of IAA and ABA in the lateral buds of Betula pendula Roth. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 20: 399-403.
16. Geuns J, Smets R, Struyf T, Prinsen E, Valcke R, Van Onckelen H. 2001. Apical dominance in Pssu-ipt-transformed tobacco. Phytochemistry 58: 911-921.
17. Gocal F, Pharis R, Yeung E, Pearce D. 1991. Changes after decapitation in concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid and abscisic acid in the larger axillary bud of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv Tender Green. Plant Physiology 95: 344-350.
18. Knox J, Wareing P. 1979. Apical dominance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. The possible roles of ABA and IAA. Journal of Experimental Botany 35: 239-244.
19. Lazar G, Goodman H. 2006. MAX1, a regulator of the flavonoid pathway, controls vegetative axillary bud outgrowth in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103: 472-476.
20. Leyser O. 2003. Regulation of shoot branching by auxin. Trends in Plant Science 8: 541-546.
21. Morris S, Cox M, Ross J, Krisantini S, Beveridge C. 2005. Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant Physiology 138: 1665-1672.
22. Napoli C, Beveridge C, Snowden K. 1999. Reevaluating concepts of apical dominance and the control of axillary bud outgrowth. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 44: 127-169.
23. Pearce D, Taylor J, Robertson J, Harker K, Daly E. 1995. Changes in abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid in axillary buds of Elytrigia repens released from apical dominance. Physiologia Plantarum 94: 110-116.
24. Pei Z, Ghassemian M, Kwak C, McCourt P, Schroeder J. 1998. Role of farnesyltransferase in ABA regulation of guard cell anion channels and plant water loss. Science 282: 287-290.
25. Phillips I. 1975. Apical dominance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 26: 342-367.
26. Pilate G, Sossountzov L, Miginiac E. 1989. Hormone levels and apical dominance in the aquatic fern Marsilea drummondii A. Br. Plant Physiology 90: 907-912.
27. Rogan P, Smith D. 1976. Experimental control of bud inhibition in rhizomes of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Zeitschrift für Plflanzenphysiologie 78: 113-121.
28. Rohde A, Van Montagn M, Boerjan W. 1999. The ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 3 (AB13) gene is expressed during vegetative quiescence processes in Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell and Environment 22: 261-270.
29. Schwartz S, Xiaoqiong Q, Zeevaart J. 2001. Characterization of a novel carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase from plants. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276: 25208-25211.
30. Schwartz S, Xiaoqiong Q, Loewen M. 2004. The biochemical characterization of two carotenoid cleavage enzymes from Arabidopsis indicates that a carotenoid-derived compound inhibits lateral branching. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 46940-46945.
31. Shimizu-Sato S, Mori H. 2001. Control of outgrowth and dormancy in axillary buds. Plant Physiology 127: 1405-1413.
32. Sorefan K, Booker J, Haurogne K, Goussot M, Bainbridge K, Foo E, et al. 2003. MAX4 and RMS1 are orthologous dioxygenase-like genes that regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis and pea. Genes and Development 17: 1469-1474.
33. Snowden K, Simkin A, Janssen B, Templeton K, Loucas H, Simons J, et al. 2005. The decreased apical dominance/petunia hybrida CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 gene affects branch production and plays a role in leaf senescence, root growth and flower development. Plant Cell 17: 746-759.
34. Tamas I. 1995. Hormonal regulation of apical dominance. In: Dordrecht D, ed. Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, 2nd edn. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 340-353.
35. Taylor J, Robertson J, Harker K, Bhalla M, Daly E, Pearce D. 1995. Apical dominance in rhizomes of quackgrass, Elytrigia repens: the effect of auxin, cytokinin and ABA. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 307-314.
36. Thimann K, Skoog F. 1933. Studies on the growth hormones of plants III. The inhibition of growth substance on bud development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA 19: 714-716.
37. Thomas R, Hay M. 2003. Relationships among shoot sinks for resources exported from nodal roots regulate branch development of distal non-rooted portions of Trifolium repens L. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 2091-2104.
38. Tucker D. 1978. Apical dominance in the tomato: the possible roles of auxin and abscisic acid. Plant Science Letters 12: 273-278.
39. Tucker D, Mansfield T. 1972. Effects of light quality on apical dominance in Xanthium strumarium and the associated changes in endogenous levels of abscisic acid and cytokinins. Planta 102: 140-151.
40. Tucker D, Mansfield T. 1973. Apical dominance in Xanthium strumarium. Journal of Experimental Botany 24: 731-740.
41. Turnbull C, Raymond M, Dodd I, Morris S. 1997. Rapid increases in cytokinin concentration in lateral buds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) during release of apical dominance. Planta 202: 271-276.
42. Turnbull C, Zhang B, Young N. 2004. Metabolomic approaches to discovering novel regulators of shoot branching. IPGSA Conference 2004. Canberra, Australia, 69.
43. Van Onckelen H, Horemans S, De Greef J. 1981. Functional aspects of abscisic acid metabolism in cotyledons of Phaseolus vulgaris L. seedlings. Plant and Cell Physiology 22: 507-515.
44. Ward S, Leyser O. 2004. Shoot branching. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 7: 73-78.
45. Wareing P, Phillips I. 1983. Abscisic acid in bud dormancy and apical dominance. In: Addicott F, ed. Abscisic acid. New York: Pradger Publishers, 303-329.
46. White J, Mansfield T. 1977. Correlative inhibition of lateral bud growth in Pisum sativum L. Studies of the role of abscisic acid. Annals of Botany 41: 1163-1170.
47. Zieslin N, Spiegelstein H, Halevy A. 1978. Components of axillary bud inhibition in rose plants. IV. Inhibitory activity of plant extracts. Botanical Gazette 139: 64-68.