Legal Changes in Juvenile Justice:: Then and Now

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 289-299

  Moak, Stacy C ^a   Wallace, Lisa Hutchinson ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

changing terminology; juvenile justice; legal changes

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749633664     PISSN: 15412040     EISSN: 15569330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1541204003001003004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American Cancer Society. (2001). Smoking legislation. Available from http://www.cancer.org
2. Amnesty International. (1998). Betraying the young: Human rights violations against children in the U.S. justice system. Available from http://web.amnesty.org
3. Anderson v. State, Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 901 S.W.2d 946 (1995).
4. Baker, M. L. (2000). Evaluation of the truancy reduction demonstration program: Interim report. Denver: Colorado Foundation for Families and Children.
5. Baker, M. L., Simon, J. N., & Nugent, M. E. (2001, November). Truancy reduction: Keeping students in school. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
6. Bilchik, S. (1999a). Juvenile justice: A century of change (1999 National Report Series, Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
7. Bilchik, S. (1999b). Minorities in the juvenile justice system (1999 National Report Series, Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8. Brady, K. P. (2001). Zero tolerance or (in)tolerance policies? Weaponless school violence, due process, and the law of student suspensions and expulsions: An examination of Fuller v. Decatur Public School Board of Education School District. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 1, 159-210.
9. Brooks, K., Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2000). School house hype: Two years later. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
10. Building blocks for youth: Children in adult jails. (2002). Retrieved September 9, 2002, from http://www.buildingblocksforyouth.org/issues/adultjails/factsheet.html
11. Butts, J., & Ojmarrh, M. (2000). Brick by brick: Dismantling the border between juvenile and adult justice. Criminal Justice, 2, 164-213.
12. Click, B. R. (1994). Statistics in Dallas encouraging. The Police Chief, 61(12), 33-36.
13. Crawford, K. A. (1998, March). Fourth Amendment implications of limiting access to high crime areas. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 27-32.
14. Death Penalty Information Center. (2002). Number of executions by year since 1976. Available from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org
15. Feld, B. (1998). Abolish the juvenile court: Youthfulness, criminal responsibility and sentencing policy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 68-136.
16. Finley, M., & Schindler, M. (1999). Punitive juvenile justice policies and the impact on minority youth. Federal Probation, 63(2), 11-16.
17. Fritsch, E. J., Caeti, T. J., & Taylor, R. W. (1999). Gang suppression through saturation patrol, aggressive curfew, and truancy enforcement: A quasi-experimental test of the Dallas anti-gang initiative. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 122-139.
18. Garrett, D. A., & Brewster, D. (1994). Curfew: A new look at an old tool. The Police Chief, 61(12), 29-33.
19. Garry, E. M. (1996, October). Truancy: First step to a lifetime of problems. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
20. Gavin, R. (1997). Truancy: Not just kids’ stuff anymore. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66, 8-14.
21. Hacienda v. Honig, 976 F.2d 487 (9th Cir., 1992).
22. Harrington-Lueker, D. (1992). Blown away by school violence. Education Digest, 58, 50-54.
23. Hirschel, J. D., Dean, C. W., & Dumond, D. (2001). Juvenile curfews and race: A cautionary note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12(3), 197-214.
24. Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 108 S.Ct. 592, 98 L.Ed. 2d 686 (1988).
25. Hurst, H. III. (1999). Juvenile court as we enter the millennium. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 11(6), 481-493.
26. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. Section 1400 (1975).
27. In the Interest of F.B., 555 Pa. 661, 726 A. 2d 361 (1999).
28. In re Alberto R. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth Appellate District, 235 Cal. App. 3d 1309, 1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 348 (1991).
29. In re Kevin Nigel Stanford, 537 U.S. 2002. No. 01-10009 Decided October 21, 2002.
30. Justice Policy Institute. (2002). Schools and suspensions: Self-reported crime and the growing use of suspensions. Washington, DC: The Justice Policy Institute.
31. LeBoeuf, D. (1996). Curfew: An answer to juvenile delinquency and victimization? Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
32. Marist Institute. (1998, September 8). School metal detectors favored. USA Today, p. A1.
33. Mills v. Board of Education, D.C. 348 F. Supp 866 (1972).
34. M.P. v. Governing Board of Grossmount H.S., 858 F. Supp. 1044 (S.D. Cal., 1994).
35. Mulvey, E. P., & Cauffman, E. (2001). The inherent limits of predicting school violence. The American Psychologist, 561(10), 797-802.
36. National Association of Elementary School Principals. (1997). National pool. Available from http://www.naesp.org
37. National League of Cities. (2002). NLC survey show cities turning to curfews. American City & County, 117(3), 27.
38. Pauken, P., & Daniel, P. T. K. (2000). Race discrimination in school-discipline: A legal & statistical analysis. Western Education Reporter, 139, 711, 759.
39. Pennsylvania Association of Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp 1257 (1971).
40. People v. Green, 227 Cal. App. 3d 692 (1991).
41. People v. Pruitt, 278 Ill. App. 3d 194, 662 N.E. 2d 540 (1996).
42. Regoli, R., & Hewitt, J. (1997). Delinquency in society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Rodiriecus, L. v. Waukegan School District No. 60, 90 F.2d 249 (7th Cir. 1996).
44. Sanborn, J. B., Jr. (1998). Second-class justice, first-class punishment: The use of juvenile records in sentencing adults. Judicature, 81, 206-213.
45. Schiraldi, V. (1998). Hyping school violence. (1998, August 25). The Washington Post, p. A15.
46. Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior: Its sociological implications. New York: Harper and Row.
47. Sickmund, M. (1994). How juveniles get to criminal court (Juvenile Justice Bulletin). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48. Snell, T. L. (1997, December). Capital punishment (NCJ-167031). Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, 5.
49. Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
50. Spergel, I., Curry, D., Chance, R., Kane, C., Ross, R., & Alexander, A., et al. (1994). Gang suppression and intervention: Problem and response. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
51. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).
52. Steldt v. School Board of Riverdale, 885 F. Supp. 1192, (W.D. Wis., 1995).
53. Stone, D. H. (1993). Crime and punishment in public schools: An empirical study of disciplinary proceedings. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 17, 351, 366.
54. Torbet, P., & Szymanski, L. (1998). State legislative responses to violent juvenile crime: 1996-97 update (Juvenile Justice Bulletin, NCJ 172835). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
55. Todd v. Rush County Schools, 133 F. 3d 984 (1998).
56. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Fall 1998 elementary and secondary school civil rights compliance report: National and state projections. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
57. U.S. Department of Transportation. (1999). Sentencing and dispositions of youth DUI and other alcohol offenses. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58. Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U. S. 646 (1995).
59. Watkins, J. C., Jr. (1998). The juvenile justice century: A sociological commentary on American juvenile courts. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
60. Wilkins v. Missouri, 492 U. S. 361 (1989).
61. Ybarra v. State, 775 S.W.2d 409 (Tex. App.—Wacco, 1989).