Utilising SENSE to reduce scan duration in high-resolution contrast-enhanced renal MR angiography

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 873-879

  Wilson, Gregory J ^a,b,g   Eubank, William B ^a,c   Vasbinder, G Boudewijn C ^d   Kessels, Alfons G H ^d   Hoogeveen, Romhild M ^b   Muthupillai, Raja ^b,e,f   Maki, Jeffrey H ^a,c  

^a Puget Sound Health Care System   (United States)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e ST LUKE S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast agents; MR angiography; Parallel imagine; Renal artery stenosis; SENSE

Indexed keywords

CHELATE; GADOLINIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; PARENCHYMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RADIOLOGIST; READER CONFIDENCE; RENAL ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY ENCODING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TIME; FEASIBILITY STUDY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33749624218     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20691     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:689-695.
2. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, et al. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:39-44.
3. Steffens JC, Link J, Grassner J, et al. Contrast-enhanced, k-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:617-622.
4. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998;207:497-504.
5. Korst MB, Joosten FB, Postma CT, Jager GJ, Krabbe JK, Barentsz JO. Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:629-634.
6. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997;205:128-136.
7. Knesplova L, Krestin GP. Magnetic resonance in the assessment of renal function. Eur Radiol 1998;8:201-211.
8. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with conventional angiography versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1999;210:367-372.
9. Knopp MV, Floemer F, Schoenberg SO, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Bock M, van Kaick G. Non-invasive assessment of renal artery stenosis: current concepts and future directions in magnetic resonance angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:S111-S117.
10. Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Stemerman DH, Weinreb JC. Single-dose breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the renal arteries. Radiology 1999;211:69-78.
11. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JM. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a metaanalysis. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:401-411.
12. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for diagnosing renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:674-682.
13. Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Huston 3rd J. Theoretical limits of spatial resolution in elliptical-centric contrast-enhanced 3d-MRA. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:1106-1116.
14. Kaandorp DW, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kemerink GJ, van Engelshoven JM. Motion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:924-928.
15. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al. Motion of the distal renal artery during 3D contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:685-696.
16. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-651.
17. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ. Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breath-hold three-dimensional gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:793-802.
18. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King BF, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, Ehman RL. Flouroscopically-triggered contrast-enhanced three dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. Radiology 1997;205:137-146.
19. Fain SB, King BF, Breen JF, Kruger DG, Riederer SJ. High-spatial- resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2001;218:481-490.
20. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591-603.
21. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
22. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202-1210.
23. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Kassner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3d MRA using SENSE. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:671-677.
24. Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA, Li W, Wolff S, Manning WJ, Edelman RR. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics: a pilot study. Radiology 2000;217:284-289.
25. Chen Q, Quijano CV, Mai VM, et al. On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging. Radiology 2004;231:893-899.
26. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology 2002;225:583-588.
27. Hoogeveen RM, Conrad R, Gieseke J. Shortened breath-hold 3D contrast-enhanced MRA using SENSE. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Denver, CO, USA, 2000. p 187.
28. Maki JH, Prince MR, Chenevert TC. Optimizing three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Invest Radiol 1998;33:528-537.
29. Fain SB, Riederer SJ. Dependence of venous enhancement on the field of view in 3D contrast-enhanced MRA using the elliptical centric view order. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:1134-1141.