Neuronal computations with stochastic network states

Science

Volumn 314, Issue 5796, 2006, Pages 85-90

  Destexhe, Alain ^a   Contreras, Diego ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; NEURONAL NETWORKS; STOCHASTIC NETWORK STATES;

BRAIN; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

NERVOUS SYSTEM; SENSORY SYSTEM; STOCHASTICITY;

ANESTHESIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEOCORTEX; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CONDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SLEEP; WAKEFULNESS;

ANESTHESIA; ATTENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEOCORTEX; NERVE NET; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; SLEEP; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SYNAPSES; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 33749621045     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1127241     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. R. R. Llinas, Science 242, 1654 (1988).
2. M. Steriade, Neuroscience 101, 243 (2000).
3. D. A. McCormick, Prog. Neurobiol. 39, 337 (1992).
4. M. Steriade, D. A. McCormick, T. J. Sejnowski, Science 262, 679 (1993).
5. M. Steriade, Neuronal Substrates of Sleep and Epilepsy (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003).
6. D. Contreras, M. Steriade, J. Neurosci. 15, 604 (1995).
7. M. Steriade, I. Timofeev, F. Grenier, J. Neurophysiol. 85, 1969 (2001).
8. M. Steriade, D. Contreras, F. Amzica, I. Timofeev, J. Neurosci. 16, 2788 (1996).
9. I. Lampl, Y. Yarom, J. Neurophysiol. 70, 2181 (1993).
10. W. Singer, Neuron 24, 49 (1999).
11. M. S. Livingstone, D. H. Hubel, Nature 291, 554 (1981).
12. F. Worgotter et al., Nature 396, 165 (1998).
13. B. Li, K. Funke, F. Worgotter, U. T. Eysel, J. Physiol. 514, 857 (1999).
14. K. Funke, U. T. Eysel, Brain Res. 573, 217 (1992).
15. A. Arieli, A. Sterkin, A. Grinvald, A. Aertsen, Science 273, 1868 (1996).
16. M. Tsodyks, T. Kenet, A. Grinvald, A. Arieli, Science 286, 1943 (1999).
17. T. J. Morrow, K. L. Casey, J. Neurophysiol. 67, 305 (1992).
18. J. M. Edeline, G. Dutrieux, Y. Manunta, E. Hennevin, Eur. J. Neurosci. 14, 1865 (2001).
19. M. A. Kisley, G. L. Gerstein, J. Neurosci. 19, 10451 (1999).
20. L. M. Miller, C. E. Schreiner, J. Neurosci. 20, 7011 (2000).
21. M. Murakami, H. Kashiwadani, Y. Kirino, K. Mori, Neuron 46, 285 (2005).
22. M. Steriade, M. Deschenes, Brain Res. 320, 1 (1984).
23. R. R. Llinas, M. Steriade, J. Neurophysiol. 95, 3297 (2006).
24. D. Contreras, M. Steriade, Neuroscience 76, 11 (1997).
25. M. Steriade, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 27, 678 (1969).
26. M. Steriade, G. Iosif, V. Apostol, J. Neurophysiol. 32, 251 (1969).
27. M. Steriade, M. Deschenes, G. Oakson, J. Neurophysiol. 37, 1065 (1974).
28. R. Llinas, U. Ribary, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 2078 (1993).
29. R. R. Llinas, D. Pare, Neuroscience 44, 521 (1991).
30. C. E. Connor, D. C. Preddie, J. L. Gallant, D. C. Van Essen, J. Neurosci. 17, 3201 (1997).
31. G. M. Ghose, J. H. Maunsell, Nature 419, 616 (2002).
32. H. Spitzer, R. Desimone, J. Moran, Science 240, 338 (1988).
33. Y. Fregnac, paper presented at Cosyne: Computational and Systems Neuroscience 2006, Salt Lake City, Utah, 5 to 8 March, 2006.
34. J. Fiser, C. Chiu, M. Weliky, Nature 431, 573 (2004).
35. K. Wiesenfeld, F. Moss, Nature 373, 33 (1995).
36. A. Destexhe, M. Rudolph, D. Pare, Not. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 739 (2003).
37. M. Rudolph, A. Destexhe, J. Neurosci. 23, 2466 (2003).
38. Y. Shu, A. Hasenstaub, M. Badoual, T. Bal, D. A. McCormick, J. Neurosci. 23, 10388 (2003).
39. F. S. Chance, L. F. Abbott, A. D. Reyes, Neuron 35, 773 (2002).
40. A. Destexhe, M. Rudolph, J. M. Fellous, T. J. Sejnowski, Neuroscience 107, 13 (2001).
41. J. M. Fellous, M. Rudolph, A. Destexhe, T. J. Sejnowski, Neuroscience 122, 811 (2003).
42. D. Jaeger, J. M. Bower, J. Neurosci. 19, 6090 (1999).
43. N. Ho, A. Destexhe, J. Neurophysiol. 84, 1488 (2000).
44. J. Wolfart, D. Debay, G. Le Masson, A. Destexhe, T. Bal, Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1760 (2005).
45. D. J. Amit, Modeling Brain Function (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, USA, 1989).
46. B. W. Knight, J. Gen. Physiol. 59, 734 (1972).
47. P. Jung, G. Mayer-Kress, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2130 (1995).
48. J. J. Collins, C. C. Chow, T. T. Imhoff, Nature 376, 236 (1995).
49. N. G. Stocks, R. Mannella, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 64, 030902 (2001).
50. G. Silberberg, M. Bethge, H. Markram, K. Pawelzik, M. Tsodyks, J. Neurophysiol. 91, 704 (2004).
51. M. Tsodyks, T. J. Sejnowski, Netw. Computat. Neural Syst. 6, 111 (1995).
52. C. van Vreeswijk, H. Sompolinsky, Science 274, 1724 (1996).
53. M. C. van Rossum, G. G. Turrigiano, S. B. Nelson, J. Neurosci. 22, 1956 (2002).
54. A. D. Reyes, Nat. Neurosci. 6, S93 (2003).
55. V. Litvak, H. Sompolinsky, I. Segev, M. Abeles, J. Neurosci. 23, 3006 (2003).
56. M. Diesmann, M. O. Gewaltig, A. Aertsen, Nature 402, 529 (1999).
57. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
58. A. Destexhe, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 50, 1594 (1994).
59. Preliminary results from S. El Boustani and A. Destexhe indicate that such an analogy also holds for more realistic connectivity schemes.
60. C. Mehring, U. Hehl, M. Kubo, M. Diesmann, A. Aertsen, Biol. Cybern. 88, 395 (2003).
61. T. P. Vogels, L. F. Abbott, J. Neurosci. 25, 10786 (2005).
62. D. Pare, E. Shink, H. Gaudreau, A. Destexhe, E. J. Lang, J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1450 (1998).
63. F. Alvarez, A. Destexhe, Neurocomputing 58, 285 (2004).
64. W. Maass, H. Markram, Neural Netw. 15, 155 (2002).
65. D. V. Buonomano, M. M. Merzenich, Science 267, 1028 (1995).
66. J. J. Hopfield, C. D. Brody, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 1282 (2001).
67. M. A. Sommer, R. H. Wurtz, Science 296, 1480 (2002).
68. R. W. Sperry, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 43, 482 (1950).
69. D. M. Wolpert, J. R. Flanagan, Curr. Biol. 11, R729 (2001).
70. C. C. Bell, A. Caputi, K. Grant, J. Serrier, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 4650 (1993).
71. M. Steriade, E. G. Jones, D. A. McCormick, Thalamus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997).
72. A similar interaction could also arise from corticocortical loops: A given cortical area may modulate its own cortical inputs by directly influencing the state of activity in the area from which these inputs originate.
73. A. Destexhe, D. Contreras, M. Steriade, J. Neurosci. 19, 4595 (1999).
74. We dedicate this article to Mircea Steriade. We thank S. El Boustani, L. Finkel, Y. Frégnac, and A. Herz for comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge support from NIH, the Human Frontier Science Program, the European Community, and the CNRS.