Application of a dynamic model for predicting flux decline in crossflow ultrafiltration

Desalination

Volumn 198, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 303-309

  Vincent Vela, María Cinta ^a   Blanco, Silvia Álvarez ^a   García, Jaime Lora ^a   Rodríguez, Enrique Bergantiños ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crossflow ultrafiltration; Flux decline; Fouling; Modelling

Indexed keywords

CROSSFLOW ULTRAFILTRATION; FLUX DECLINE; PERMEATE FLUX;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

ULTRAFILTRATION;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

FLUX MEASUREMENT; FOULING; MEMBRANE; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 33749596381     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Song L. Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 139 (1998) 183-200
2. Mugnier N., Howell J.A., and Ruf M. Optimisation of a back-flush sequence for zeolite microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 175 (2000) 149-161
3. 4 scale formation mechanism in various nanofiltration modules. J. Membr. Sci. 163 (1999) 63-74
4. Prádanos P., Arribas J.I., and Hernández A. J. Membr. Sci. 99 (1995) 1-20
5. In: Cheryan M. (Ed). Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook. 2nd ed. (1998), CRC Press, New York
6. Belfort G., Davis R.H., and Zydney A.L. The behaviour of suspensions and macromolecular solutions in crossflow ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 96 (1994) 1-58
7. Davis R.H. Modeling of fouling of crossflow microfiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Methods 21 (1992) 75-126
8. Song L., and Elimelech M. Theory of concentration polarization in crossflow filtration. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 91 (1995) 3389-3398
9. Tam C., and Trembley A. Membrane pore characterization - comparison between single and multicomponent solute probe techniques. J. Membr. Sci. 57 (1991) 271-287