Comparative study on the aerial and subterranean flower development in Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth. (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae), an amphicarpic species

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 167, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 943-949

  Zhang, Yi ^a   Yang, Ji ^a   Rao, Guang Yuan ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth.; Amphicarpy; Leguminosae; Ontogeny; Papilionoideae; Subterranean flowers

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOWER; LEGUME; MORPHOLOGY; ONTOGENY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUBTERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT;

AMPHICARPAEA EDGEWORTHII; FABACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PAPILIONOIDEAE;

EID: 33749590962     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/505610     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arroyo K 1981 Breeding system and pollination biology in Leguminosae. Page 729 in RM Polhill, PH Raveb, eds. Advances in legume systematics. Pt 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
2. Barrett SCH 2002 The evolutionary of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274-284.
3. Cheplick GP 1987 The ecology of amphicarpic plants. Trends Ecol Evol 2:97-101.
4. Cheplick GP, JA Quinn 1988 Subterranean seed production and population responses of fire in Amphicarpum purshii (Gramineae). J Ecol 76:263-273.
5. Fenster CB, LF Galloway 1997 Developmental homeostasis and floral form: evolutionary consequences and genetic basis. Int J Plant Sci 158(suppl):S121-S130.
6. Holsinger KE 1988 Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution 42:1235-1244.
7. Hufford L, PK Diggle 1997 The morphology and evolution of flowers: a tribute to the work of Shirley Tucker: an introduction. Int J Plant Sci 158(suppl):S1-S2.
8. Kaul V, AK Koul, MC Sharma 2000 The underground flower. Curr Sci 78:39-44.
9. Kong HZ, AM Lu, PK Endress 2002 Floral organogenesis of Chloranthus sessilifolius, with special emphasis on the morphological nature of the androecium of Chloranthus (Chloranthaceae). Plant Syst Evol 232:181-188.
10. Lande R, DW Schemske 1985 The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. Evolution 39:24-40.
11. Lev-Yadun S 2000 Why are underground flowering and fruiting more common in Israel than anywhere else in the world? Curr Sci 79:289.
12. Lord EM 1982 Floral morphogenesis in Lamium amplexicaule L. (Labiate) with a model for the evolution of the cleistogamous flower. Bot Gaz 143:63-72.
13. Mayers AM, EM Lord 1983a Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. I. A growth rate study. Am J Bot 70:1548-1555.
14. - 1983b Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. II. A organographic study. Am J Bot 70:1556-1563.
15. - 1984 Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous species Viola odorata. III. A histological study. Bot Gaz 145:83-91.
16. Minter TC, EM Lord 1983 A comparison of cleistogamous and chasmogamous floral development in Collomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). Am J Bot 70:1499-1508.
17. Prenner G 2004a Floral development in Daviesia cordata (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Mirbelieae) and its systematic implications. Aust J Bot 52:285-291.
18. - 2004b Floral ontogeny in Lespedeza thunbergii (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae: Desmodieae): variations from the unidirectional mode of organ formation. J Plant Res 117:297-302.
19. Schemske DW 1978 Evolution of reproductive characteristic in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59:596-613.
20. Schnee BK, DM Waller 1986 Reproductive behavior of Amphicarpaea bracteata (Leguminosae), an amphicarpic annual. Am J Bot 73:376-386.
21. Trapp EJ, SD Hendrix 1988 Consequences of a mixed reproductive system in the hog peanut, Amphicarpaea bracteata, (Fabaceae). Oecologia 75:285-290.
22. Tucker SC 1987 Pseudoracemes in papilionoid legumes: their nature, development, and variation. Bot J Linn Soc 95:181-206.
23. - 1988a Dioecy in Bauhinia resulting from organ suppression. Am J Bot 75:1584-1597.
24. - 1988b Heteromorphic floral development in Neptunia pubescens, a mimosoid legume. Am J Bot 75:205-224.
25. - 1989a Evolutionary implications of floral ontogeny in legumes. Pages 59-76 in CH Stiron, JL Zarucchi, eds. Advances in legume biology. Monographs in Systematic Botany. Vol 29. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
26. - 1989b Overlapping organ initiation and common primordia in flowers of Pisum sativum (Leguminosae: Papilionideae). Am J Bot 76:714-729.
27. - 1994 Floral ontogeny in Sophoreae (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). II. Sophora sensu lato (Sophora group). Am J Bot 81:368-380.
28. - 1997 Floral evolution, development, and convergence: the hierarchical-significance hypothesis. Int J Plant Sci 158(suppl):S143-S161.
29. - 2003 Floral development in legumes. Plant Physiol 131: 911-926.
30. Waller DM 1986 Is there disruptive selection for self-fertilization? Am Nat 128:421-426.
31. Zhang Y, J Yang, GY Rao 2005 Genetic diversity of an amphicarpic species, Amphicarpaea edgeworthii Benth. (Leguminosae) based on RAPD markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 33:1246-1257.