Nutritional support for patients suffering from intestinal graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

American Journal of Hematology

Volumn 81, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 747-752

  Imataki, Osamu ^a   Nakatani, Shigetoshi ^a   Hasegawa, Terumi ^a   Kondo, Miki ^a   Ichihashi, Kiyoko ^a   Araki, Mitsuko ^a   Ishida, Toshihiko ^b   Kim, Sung Won ^a   Mori, Shin Ichiro ^a   Fukuda, Takahiro ^a   Tobinai, Kensei ^a   Tanosaki, Ryuji ^a   Makimoto, Atsushi ^a   Takaue, Yoichi ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b KAGAWA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Enteral nutrition; Graft versus host disease (GVHD); Immunonutrition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION; DIARRHEA; DIET THERAPY; DISEASE EXACERBATION; ENTERIC FEEDING; ENTEROCOLITIS; ENTEROPATHY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOM; GRAFT VERSUS HOST REACTION; HUMAN; INTESTINAL BLEEDING; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; SAFETY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; ENTERAL NUTRITION; FEMALE; GRAFT VS HOST DISEASE; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; INTESTINAL DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARENTERAL NUTRITION, TOTAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 33749575077     PISSN: 03618609     EISSN: 10968652     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.20700     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Antin JH. Clinical practice. Long-term care after hematopoietic-cell transplantation in adults. N Engl J Med 2002;347:36-42.
2. Welsh FK, Farmery SM, MacLennan K, et al. Gut barrier function in malnourished patients. Gut 1998;42:396-401.
3. Weisdorf SS, Schwarzenborg SJ. Hematopoietic cell transplantation, 2nd ed. Nutritional support of hematopoietic stem cell recipients. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999. p 723.
4. Moore FA, Moore EE, Jones TN, et al. TEN versus TPN following major abdominal trauma-reduced septic morbidity. J Trauma 1989;29:916-922; discussion 922-923.
5. Archer SB, Burnett RJ, Fischer JE. Current uses and abuses of total parenteral nutrition. Adv Surg 1996;26:165-189.
6. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA, et al. Bone-marrow transplantation (second of two parts). N Engl J Med 1975;292:895-902.
7. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;15:825-828.
8. Weisdorf SA, Lysne J, Wind D, et al. Positive effect of prophylactic total parenteral nutrition on long-term outcome of bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1987;43:833-838.
9. Szeluga DJ, Stuart RK, Brookmeyer R, et al. Nutritional support of bone marrow transplant recipients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing total parenteral nutrition to an enteral feeding program. Cancer Res 1987;47:3309-3316.
10. Suchner U, Kuhn KS, Furst P. The scientific basis of immunonutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 2000;59:553-563.
11. Lipman TO. Grains or veins: is enteral nutrition really better than parenteral nutrition? A look at the evidence. J Parenter Enter Nutr 1998;22:167-168.
12. Heyland DK, Novak F, Drover JW, et al. Should immunonutrition become routine in critically ill patients? A systematic review of the evidence. J Am Med Assoc 2001;286:944-953.
13. Gianotti L, Braga M, Fortis C, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical trial on perioperative feeding with an arginine-, omega-3 fatty acid-, and RNA-enriched enteral diet: effect on host response and nutritional status. J Parenter Enter Nutr 1999;23:314-320.
14. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients: A.S.P.E.N. Board of directors. J Parenter Enter Nutr 1993;17:5SA-6SA.