Determining the productivity of resultatives: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff

Language

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 448-464

  Boas, Hans C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749561371     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2005.0050     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. ANTTILA, RAIMO. 1977. Analogy. The Hague: Mouton.
2. ANTTILA, RAIMO. 1989. Historical and comparative linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. BARDDAL, JOHANNA. 2004. A unified account of syntactic productivity. Paper presented at the University of Texas at Austin Linguistics Circle, April 2004.
4. BARLOW, MICHAEL, and SUZANNE KEMMER. 2000. Usage based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
5. BOAS, HANS C. 2000a. Resultatives at the crossroads between the lexicon and syntax: Where are they formed? Proceedings of the 1999 Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 1999) 11.38-52.
6. BOAS, HANS C. 2000b. Resultative constructions in English and German. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill dissertation.
7. BOAS, HANS C. 2002a. On the role of semantic constraints in resultative constructions. Linguistics on the way into the new millennium, ed. by Reinhard Rapp, 35-44. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
8. BOAS, HANS C. 2002b. On constructional polysemy and verbal polysemy in construction grammar. Proceedings of the 2000 Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 2000) 12.126-39.
9. BOAS, HANS C. 2003. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
10. BOAS, HANS C. 2006. Leaking argument structures in construction grammar. Pragmatics in construction grammar and frame semantics, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, to appear.
11. BYBEE, JOAN. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10.5.425-55.
12. BYBEE, JOAN. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. BYBEE, JOAN, and SANDRA THOMPSON. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23.378-88.
14. CARRIER, JILL, and JANET RANDALL. 1992. The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23.173-234.
15. CARTER, RICHARD. 1988. Compositionality and polysemy. On linking: Papers by Richard Carter (MIT Lexicon Project working papers 25), ed. by Beth Levin and Carol Tenny, 167-204. Cambridge: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
16. CROFT, WILLIAM. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson.
17. CROFT, WILLIAM. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. FILLMORE, CHARLES F. 1982. Frame semantics. Linguistics in the morning calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111-38. Seoul: Hanshin.
19. FILLMORE, CHARLES F. 1989. Grammatical construction theory and the familiar dichotomies. Language processing in social context, ed. by Rainer Dietrich and Carl F. Graumann, 17-38. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. FILLMORE, CHARLES F., and B. T. S. ATKINS. 1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Kittay, 75-102. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
21. FILLMORE, CHARLES F.; CHRISTOPHER R. JOHNSON; and MIRIAM R. L. PETRUCK. 2003. Background to Framenet. International Journal of Lexicography 16.3.235-50.
22. FIRTH, JOHN. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-1955. Studies in linguistic analysis (Special volume of the Philological Society), ed. by John Firth et al., 1-32. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. GEERAERTS, DIRK. 1994. Vagueness's puzzles, polysemy's vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics 4.223-72.
24. GOLDBERG, ADELE E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. GOLDBERG, ADELE E., and RAY JACKENDOFF. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80.3.532-68.
26. GRIES, STEFAN, and ANATOL STEFANOWITSCH. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on 'alternations'. International Joumal of Corpus Linguistics 9.1.97-129.
27. HAIMAN, JOHN. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54.3.564-89.
28. HERMANN, EDUARD. 1931. Lautgesetz und Analogie. (Abhandlungen der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, Neue Folge 23.3.) Berlin: Weidman.
29. HOEKSTRA, TEUN. 1988. Small clause result. Lingua 74.101-39.
30. INCHAURRALDE, CARLOS. 2000. Lexicopedia. The lexicon-encyclopedia interface, ed. by Bert Peeters, 97-114. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. ISRAEL, MICHAEL. 1996. The way constructions grow. Conceptual structure, discourse, and language, ed. by Adele Goldberg, 217-31. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
32. JANDA, LAURA. 1996. Back from the brink: A study of how relic forms in languages serve as source material for analogical extension. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
33. LAKOFF, GEORGE. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. LAKOFF, GEORGE. 1996. Sorry, I'm not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. Spaces, worlds, and grammar, ed. by Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser, 91-123. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. LANGACKER, RONALD. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. LANGACKER, RONALD. 1988. A usage-based model. Topics in cognitive linguistics, ed. by Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, 127-61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. LANGACKER, RONALD. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. Usage based models of language, ed. by Suzanne Kemmer and Michael Barlow, 1-63. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
38. LEHRER, ADRIENNE. 1990. Polysemy, conventionality, and the structure of the lexicon. Cognitive Linguistics 1.2.207-46.
39. LEISI, ERNST. 1954. Der Wortinhalt: Seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
40. MEYER, CHARLES. 2002. English corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. MÜLLER, STEFAN. 2005. Resultative constructions: Syntax, world knowledge, and collocational restrictions. (Review of Hans C. Boas: A constructional approach to resultatives.) Studies in Language 29.3, to appear.
42. ÖSTMAN, JAN-OLA, and MIRIAM FRIED. 2004. Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, ed. by Mirjam Fried and Jan-Ola Östman, 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. PETRUCK, MIRIAM. 1996. Frame semantics. Handbook of pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1-13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. RAPPAPORT HOVAV, MALKA, and BETH LEVIN. 1998. Building verb meaning. The projection of arguments, ed. by Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder, 97-134. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
45. RAPPAPORT HOVAV, MALKA, and BETH LEVIN. 2001. An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77.4.766-97.
46. ROSCH, ELEANOR. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4.328-50.
47. SINCLAIR, JOHN. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. TALMY, LEONARD. 2000. Cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. VERSPOOR, CORNELIA. 1997. Contextually-dependent lexical semantics. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
50. VOSNIADU, STELLA, and ANDREW ORTONY. 1989. Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. WECHSLER, STEPHEN. 2001. An analysis of English resultatives under the event-argument homomorphism model of telicity. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Text Structure, University of Texas at Austin, October 13-15, 2000.
52. WECHSLER, STEPHEN. 2005. Weighing in on scales: A reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language 81.2.465-73.
53. WHEELER, BENJAMIN IDE. 1887. Analogy and the scope of its application in language. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
54. WINTERS, MARGARET. 1997. Kuryłowicz, analogical change, and cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 8.359-86.
55. WITTGENSTEIN, LUDWIG. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.