Reliability of multicenter magnetic resonance imaging: Results of a phantom test and in vivo measurements by the German Dementia Competence Network;Multizentrische reliabilität MRT-gestützter volumetrie des gehirns: Ergebnisse des phantomtests und voxelbasierter morphometrie im kompetenznetz demenzen

Nervenarzt

Volumn 77, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1086-1095

  Teipel, S J ^a   Ewers, M ^a,b   Dietrich, O ^b   Schoenberg, S O ^b   Jessen, F ^c   Heun, R ^c   Freymann, N ^c   Moller H J ^a   Hampel, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dementia Competence Network; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Multicenter; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; BRAIN ATROPHY; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; GERMANY; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOLUMETRY;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; ATROPHY; BRAIN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33749527177     PISSN: 00282804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00115-005-1948-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson RN, Smith BL (2003) Deaths: leading causes for 2001. Natl Vital Stat Rep 52:1-85
2. Hampel H et al. (1997) [Structural magnetic resonance tomography in diagnosis and research of Alzheimer type dementia]. Nervenarzt 68:365-378
3. Jack CRJMD et al. (2000) Rates of hippocampal atrophy correlate with change in clinical status in aging and AD. Neurology 55:484-490
4. DeCarli C et al. (1995) Discriminant analysis of MRI measures as a method to determine the presence of dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res 57:119-130
5. Hampel H et al. (2002) In vivo imaging of region and cell type specific neocortical neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Perspectives of MRI derived corpus callosum measurement for mapping disease progression and effects of therapy. Evidence from studies with MRI, EEG and PET. J Neural Transm 109:837-855
6. Teipel SJ et al. (2003) Regional pattern of hippocampus and corpus callosum atrophy in Alzheimer's disease in relation to dementia severity: evidence for early neocortical degeneration. Neurobiol Aging 24:85-94
7. Juottonen K et al. (1998) Volumes of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 19:15-22
8. Du AT et al. (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging of the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:441-447
9. Fox NC et al. (2001) Imaging of onset and progression of Alzheimer's disease with voxel-compression mapping of serial magnetic resonance images. Lancet 358:201-205
10. Frisoni GB et al. (2002) Detection of grey matter loss in mild Alzheimer's disease with voxel based morphometry. Mapping gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:657-664
11. Baron JC et al. (2001) In vivo mapping of gray matter loss with voxel-based morphometry in mild Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 14:298-309
12. Teipel SJ et al. (2005) Age-related cortical grey matter reductions in nondemented Down's syndrome adults determined by magnetic resonance imaging with voxel-based morphometry. Brain (in press)
13. Davis PC et al. (1992) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part III. Reliability of a standardized MRI evaluation of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 42:1676-1680
14. Henn FA (2003) Kompetenznetz Demenzen. Psychoneuro 6:251
15. Wiltfang J et al. (2003) Kompetenznetz Demenzen-Früherkennung und Differenzialdiagnose. Psychoneuro 6:290-293
16. ACR (2000) Phantom test guidance for the ACR MRI accredition program. American College of Radiology, Reston
17. Chen CC et al. (2004) Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results. J Digit Imaging 17:279-284
18. Smith S (1999) Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp 17:143-155
19. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S (2001) Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation maximation algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:45-57
20. Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York
21. Faul F, Erdfelder E (1992) GPOWER: a priori, posthoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS [Computer program]. Bonn
22. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A (1996) GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28:1-11
23. Tofts PS (1998) Standardisation and optimisation of magnetic resonance techniques for multicentre studies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:S37-S43
24. McRobbie DW, Quest RA (2002) Effectiveness and relevance of MR acceptance testing: results of an 8 year audit. Br J Radiol 75:523-531
25. Prott FJ et al. (1995) Comparison of imaging accuracy at different MRI units based on phantom measurements. Radiother Oncol 37:221-224
26. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2001) Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. Neuroimage 14:1238-1243
27. Bookstein FL (2001) "Voxel-based morphometry" should not be used with imperfectly registered images. Neuroimage 14:1454-1462