Avoiding potential misuses of addiction brain science

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1529-1532

  Hall, Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE; DISULFIRAM; ILLICIT DRUG; NALTREXONE; OPIATE; PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;

ADDICTION; ALCOHOLISM; BEHAVIOR GENETICS; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; DRUG DETOXIFICATION; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HEREDITY; HUMAN; NEUROSCIENCE; OPIATE ADDICTION; POLICY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROPHYLAXIS; RELAPSE; SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES;

BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; HUMANS; NEUROSCIENCES; RESEARCH; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 33749524844     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01604.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (29)

1. Garavan H., Lingford-Hughes A., Jones T., Morris P., Rothwell J. & Williams S. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Neuroimaging. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
2. Volkow N., Li T. K. The neuroscience of addiction. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1429-30.
3. Morris K. A., Iverson L. J., Nutt D. J. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Pharmacology and Treatments. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
4. Robbins T. W., Cardinal R. N., DiCiano P. et al. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Neuroscience of Drugs and Addiction. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
5. Ball D., Pembrey M., Stephens D. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Genomics. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
6. Hall W. The search for an elixir of abstinence. Aust Fam Physician 1998; 27: S1-2.
7. Room R. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Social Policy and Psychoactive Substances. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
8. Capps B., Ashcroft R., Campbell A. V. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Ethical Aspects of Development in Neuroscience and Drug Addiction . London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
9. Leshner A. I. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science 1997; 278: 45-7.
10. Szasz T. Ceremonial Chemistry: the Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts and Pushers. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications; 1997.
11. MacCoun R., Reuter P. Drugwar Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
12. Dackis C., O'Brien C. Neurobiology of addiction: treatment and public policy ramifications. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1431-6.
13. Hall W. D., Carter L., Morley K. I. Neuroscience research on the addictions: a prospectus for future ethical and policy analysis. Addict Behav 2004; 29: 1481-95.
14. Hall W. UROD: an antipodean therapeutic enthusiasm. Addiction 2000; 95: 1765-6.
15. Gao G., Wang X., He S., Li W., Wang Q., Liang Q. et al. Clinical study for alleviating opiate drug psychological dependence by a method of ablating the nucleus accumbens with stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Func Neurosurg 2003; 81: 96-104.
16. Hall W. D. Stereotactic neurosurgical treatment of addiction: minimising the chances of another 'great and desperate cure'. Addiction 2006; 101: 1-3.
17. Hall W., Carter L. Ethical issues in using a cocaine vaccine to treat and prevent cocaine abuse and dependence. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 337-40.
18. Cohen P. J. Untreated addiction imposes an ethical bar to recruiting addicts for non-therapeutic studies of addictive drugs. J Law Med Ethics 2002; 30: 73-81.
19. Charland L. C. Cynthia's dilemma: consenting to heroin prescription. Am J Bioethics 2002; 2: 37-47.
20. Hall W., Carter L., Morley K. Heroin addiction and the capacity for consent: a reply to Charland. Addiction 2003; 98: 1775-6.
21. Hall W. D., Sannibale C. Are there two types of alcoholism? Lancet 1996; 348: 1258.
22. Sherman W. Test targets addiction gene. Daily News. New York, 11 February 2006 [electronic edition]. Available at: http://www.nydailynews.com/city_life/ health/story/390607p-331333c.html (accessed 23 February).
23. McKeganey N., Neale J., Lloyd C., Hay G. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Sociology and Substance Use. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2004.
24. Cave J. & Godfrey C. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Economics of Addiction and Drugs. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
25. Hall W. D., Teesson M. Alcohol use disorders: who should be treated and how? In: Andrews G., Henderson A. S., eds. Unmet Need in Psychiatry: Problems, Resources, Responses . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999, p. 290-301.
26. Babor T., Caetano R., Casswell S., Edwards G., Giesbrecht N., Graham K. et al. Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity: Research and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
27. Orford J. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: Gambling and Other Behavioural Addictions. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
28. Berridge V., Hickman T. Foresight State of the Art Science Review: History and the Future of Psychoactive Substances. London: Department of Trade and Industry; 2005.
29. Spooner C., Hall W. D. Preventing drug misuse by young people: we need to do more than 'just say no'. Addiction 2002; 97: 478-81.