Professional development and recursive e-learning

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 23, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 45-57

  Elges, Pam ^a   Righettini, Marielena ^a   Combs, Martha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b Marian University   (United States)

Author keywords

Asynchronous communication; Constructivism; Distance education; E learning; Literacy; Online course design; Professional development; Teaching online; WebCT

Indexed keywords

ASYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATION; CONSTRUCTIVISM; LITERACY; ONLINE COURSE; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; WEBCT;

COPYRIGHTS; CURRICULA; DISTANCE EDUCATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; TEACHING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 33749522887     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J025v23n01_05     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dunlap, J. C., & Grabinger, S. (1996). Active knowledge construction. In P. A. M. Kommers, S. Grabinger, & J. C. Dunlap (Eds.), Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration (pp. 239-254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. JALN, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, 35-57.
3. Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how I can get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
5. Karuppan, C. (2001). Web-based teaching materials: A user's profile. Internet Research, 1-12.
6. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. National assessment of educational progress. (2003). Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
8. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://www.zuni.k12.nm.us/las/2ITE/NWREL/What.htm
9. No Child Left Behind, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/accountability/ayp/ testingforresults.html
10. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum foundations, principles, and issues (4th ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Parker, D., & Gemino, A. (2001). Inside learning: Comparing conceptual and technique learning performance in place-based and ALN formats. JALN, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 36-52.
12. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
13. Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
14. Sykes, G. (1999). Introduction: Teaching as the learning profession. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession handbook of policy and practice (pp. xv-xxiii). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Uhlenbeck, A. M., Verloop, N., & Bejaard, D. (2002). Requirements for an assessment procedure for beginning teachers: Implications from recent theories on teaching and assessment. Teacher College Record, 104(2), 242-272.
16. Vanguard Media. (2002). National commission on teaching & America's future. Retrieved October 7, 2002, from http://www.nctaf.org.
17. WebCT, Inc. (2002). WebCT making it happen: Interoperability and innovation are realized in WebCT. Retrieved October 7, 2002, from http://www.webct.com.
18. Whipp. J. L. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 321-332.
19. Zafeiriou, G., Nunes, J. M. B., & Ford, N. (2001). Using students' perceptions of participation in collaborative learning activities in the design of online learning environment. Education for Information, 19, 83-106.