Research and developing countries: Hopes and hypes

Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages

  Moazam, Farhat ^a  

^a SINDH INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY AND TRANSPLANTATION   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PAKISTAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIALS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; PAKISTAN; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RESEARCH; SOCIAL VALUES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 33749488709     PISSN: 10203397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 2005, 435(7043):737-8.
2. Kranish M. System for protecting humans in research faulted. The Boston Globe, March 25, 2002.
3. Bernstein M. For subjects in Haiti study, free AIDS care has a price. New York Times, June 6, 1999 (Special Report).
4. Gilman RH, Garcia HH. Ethics review protocols for research in developing countries: a basic presumption of guilt. Canadian Medical Association journal, 2004, 171(3):248-9.
5. Moazam F. Families, patients, and physicians in medical decision-making: a Pakistani perspective. Garrison New York, Hastings Centre Report, Nov-Dec, 2000:28-37.
6. Levey M. Medical ethics of medieval Islam with special reference to Al-Ruhawi's "Practical Ethics of the Physician". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1967, 57(3).
7. Abdul Latif Shaikh A-L. Pharmaceutical research: paradox, challenge or a dilemma. Paper presented at the Research Ethics Conference, Karachi, 29 November, 2005.
8. Nundi S, Gulhati CM. A new colonialism? Conducting clinical trials in India. New England journal of medicine, 2005, 352:1633-6.
9. Daar AS, Singer PA. Human capital is key to research ethics. SciDev.Net, April 25, 2002 (http://www.scidev.net/content/opinions/eng/ human-capital-is-key-to-research-ethics.cfm, accessed 6 June 2006).
10. The Washington Post, May 2005.
11. 10/90 Report on Health Research 2003-2004. Geneva, Global Forum for Health Research, 2004.
12. Relationship between doctors and the Pharma industry. Pulse, Pakistan, 2006, 7(3).
13. Sarmiento A. Medicine and industry: the payer, the piper and the tune. Annales CRMCC, 2000, 33(3):144-9.
14. Dawn, Pakistan, November 9, 2005.
15. Braude P, Minger SL, Warwick RM. Stem cell therapy: hope or hype? British medical journal, 2005, 330:1159-60.
16. Alan Zarembo. Business not science. Sci-tech World, Dawn, Pakistan, May 28, 2005:4.
17. Rehan S. Miracle cure? Newsline, Pakistan, 18(5):92-6.