Visions for regenerative medicine: Interface between scientific fact and science fiction

Artificial Organs

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 822-827

  Kirkpatrick, C James ^a   Fuchs, Sabine ^a   Peters, Kirsten ^a   Brochhausen, Christoph ^a   Hermanns, M Iris ^a   Unger, Ronald E ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Drug delivery; Gene therapy; Intelligent materials stem cells; Life sciences; Materials sciences; Regenerative medicine

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY; GENE TRANSFER; INTELLIGENT MATERIALS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; STEM CELLS; TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

BIORESORBABLE POLYMERS; EXTERNAL STIMULUS; INTELLIGENT MATERIAL-STEM CELL; LIFE-SCIENCES; MATERIAL SCIENCE; PROGENITOR CELL; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SCIENCE FICTIONS; STEM-CELL; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

GENE THERAPY;

BIOMEDICINE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; FUTUROLOGY; GENE THERAPY; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SCIENCE; STEM CELL; STIMULUS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33749473856     PISSN: 0160564X     EISSN: 15251594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2006.00306.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Hoffman AS. Combining novel biomolecules and stimuli-sensitive biomaterials into new recognition-response biomaterial systems. Artif Organs 1988;12:504-5.
2. Deutsch M, Meinhart J, Fischlein T, Preiss P, Zilla P. Clinical autologous in vitro endothelialization of infrainguinal ePTFE grafts in 100 patients: a 9-year experience. Surgery 1999;126:847-55.
3. Kaito T, Myoui A, Takaoka K, et al. Potentiation of the activity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone regeneration by a PLA-PEG/hydroxyapatite composite. Biomaterials 2005;26:73-9.
4. Wang M, Chandrasekaran M, Bonfield W. Friction and wear of hydroxyapatite reinforced high density polyethylene against the stainless steel counterface. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:607-11.
5. Langer R, Tirrell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 2004;428:487-92.
6. Uprichard SL. The therapeutic potential of RNA interference. FEBS Lett 2005;579:5996-6007.
7. Williams BR. Targeting specific cell types with silencing RNA. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1410-11.
8. Lendlein A, Langer R. Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science 2002;296:1673-6.
9. Stayton PS, Ding Z, Hoffman AS. Smart polymer-streptavidin conjugates. Methods Mol Biol 2004;283:37-44.
10. Fittkau MH, Zilla P, Bezuidenhout D, et al. The selective modulation of endothelial cell mobility on RGD peptide containing surfaces by YIGSR peptides. Biomaterials 2005;26:167-74.
11. Seliktar D, Zisch AH, Lutolf MP, Wrana JL, Hubbell JA. MMP-2 sensitive, VEGF-bearing bioactive hydrogels for promotion of vascular healing. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;68A:704-16.
12. Park KH, Chhowalla M, Iqbal Z, Sesti F. Single-walled carbon nanotubes are a new class of ion channel blockers. J Biol Chem 2003;278:50212-6.
13. Silva GA, Czeisler C, Niece KL, et al. Selective differentiation of neural progenitor cells by high-epitope density nanofibers. Science 2004;303:1352-5.
14. Gatti AM. Biocompatibility of micro- and nano-particles in the colon. Part II. Biomaterials 2004;25:385-92.
15. Rolland JP, Maynor BW, Euliss LE, Exner AE, Denison GM, DeSimone JM. Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape-specific nanobiomaterials. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:10096-100.
16. Dorsett-Martin WA. Rat models of skin wound healing: a review. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:591-9.
17. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:66-76.
18. Fausto N. Lessons from genetically engineered animal models. V. Knocking out genes to study liver regeneration: present and future. Am J Physiol 1999;277:G917-21.
19. Birgersdotter A, Sandberg R, Ernberg I. Gene expression perturbation in vitro-a growing case for three-dimensional (3D) culture systems. Semin Cancer Biol 2005;15:405-12.
20. Hirose M, Yamato M, Kwon OH, et al. Temperature-responsive surface for novel co-culture systems of hepatocytes with endothelial cells: 2-D patterned and double layered co-cultures. Yonsei Med J 2000;41:803-13.
21. Sorkin AM, Dee KC, Knothe Tate ML. "Culture shock" from the bone cell's perspective: emulating physiological conditions for mechanobiological investigations. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004;287:C1527-36.
22. Tzima E. Role of small GTPases in endothelial cytoskeletal dynamics and the shear stress response. Circ Res 2006;98:176-85.
23. Riha GM, Lin PH, Lumsden AB, Yao Q, Chen C. Roles of hemodynamic forces in vascular cell differentiation. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:772-9.
24. Estes BT, Gimble JM, Guilak F. Mechanical signals as regulators of stem cell fate. Curr Top Dev Biol 2004;60:91-126.
25. Kirkpatrick CJ, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Unger R, Bittinger F, Otto M, Peters K. Tissue response and biomaterial integration: the efficacy of in vitro methods. Biomol Eng 2002;19:211-7.
26. Kirkpatrick CJ, Unger RE, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Schmidt H, Kamp G, Peters K. Experimental approaches to study vascularisation in tissue engineering and biomaterial applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:677-81.
27. Peters K, Schmidt H, Unger RE, Otto M, Kamp G, Kirkpatrick CJ. Software-supported image quantification of angiogenesis in an in vitro culture system: application to studies of biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2002;23:3413-9.
28. Unger RE, Wolf M, Peters K, Motta A, Migliaresi C, Kirkpatrick CJ. Growth of human cells on a non-woven silk fibroin net: a potential for use in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25:1069-75.
29. Unger RE, Peters K, Wolf M, Motta A, Migliaresi C, Kirkpatrick CJ. Endothelialization of a non-woven silk fibroin net for use in tissue engineering: growth and gene regulation of human endothelial cells. Biomaterials 2004;25:5137-46.
30. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006;311:622-7.
31. Hermanns MI, Unger RE, Kehe K, Peters K, Kirkpatrick CJ. Lung epithelial cell lines in co-culture with human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells: development of an alveolo-capillary barrier in vitro. Lab Invest 2004;84:736-52.
32. Josserand V, Pelerin H, de Bruin B, et al. Evaluation of drug penetration into the brain: a double study by in vivo imaging with positron emission tomography and using an in vitro model of the human blood-brain barrier. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006;316:79-86.
33. Black AF, Hudon V, Damour O, Germain L, Auger FA. A novel approach for studying angiogenesis: a human skin equivalent with a capillary-like network. Cell Biol Toxicol 1999;15:81-90.
34. Welss T, Basketter DA, Schroder KR. In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models. Toxicol In Vitro 2004;18:231-43.
35. Lai CH, Kuo KH. The critical component to establish in vitro BBB model: Pericyte. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005;50:258-65.
36. Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony-forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 1978;4:7-25.