On the auditory evaluation of voice quality;Zur auditiven bewertung der stimmqualität

HNO

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 793-802

  Ptok, M ^a   Schwemmle, C ^a   Iven, C ^b   Jessen, M ^b   Nawka, T ^c  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b FRESENIUS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c Klin/Poliklin HNO Kopf /Halschir   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breathiness; Dysphonia; Hoarseness; RBH Scale; Roughness

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTION; SPEECH THERAPY; STANDARD; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOICE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LARYNGEAL DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VOCAL CORDS; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 33749463851     PISSN: 00176192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-005-1310-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anders LC, Hollien H, Hurme P, Sonninen A, Wendler J (1988) Perception of hoarseness by several classes of listeners. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 40: 91-100
2. Carding P, Carlson E, Epstein R, Mathieson L, Shewell C (2000) Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 25: 133-138
3. De-Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van-de-Heyning PH, Croux C (1997) Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J Voice 11: 74-80
4. DeJonckere PH, Crevier-Buchman L, Marie JP, Moerman M, Remacle M, Woisard V (2003) Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 124: 279-283
5. Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, de-Moor GM, Wieneke GH (1993) Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 45: 76-83
6. Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B (1996) Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 117: 219-224
7. Evans R, Nawka T, Gong Y, Gluud C (2004) Auditive Stimmbeurteilung nach dem CAPE-V-Protokoll in einer multizentrischen Studie. Jahrestagung der DGPP, http://www.egms.de/en/meetings/dgpp2004/04dgpp75.shtml
8. Fujiu M, Hibi SR, Hirano M (1988) An improved technique for measurement of the relative noise level using a sound spectrograph. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 40: 53-57
9. Gerratt BR, Kreiman J (2001) Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 110 (5 Pt 1): 2560-2566
10. Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, Antonanzas-Barroso N, Berke GS (1993) Comparing internal and external standards in voice quality judgments. J Speech Hear Res 36: 14-20
11. Halberstam B (2004) Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 66: 70-73
12. Hiki S, Imaizumi S, Hirano M, Matsushita H, Kakita Y (1976) Acoustical analysis for voice disorders. Proc IEEE Icassp: Rome, 613-616
13. Hiki S, Kakita Y, Hirano M, Matsushita H (1976) Acoustic analysis for voice disorders. A basic conception for the use of acoustic measurements for the diagnosis in voice disorders. Prakt Otol (Kyoto) 69: 267-271
14. Hiki S, Kakita Y, Hirano M, Matsushita H, Imaizumi S (1977) Correlation between parameters related to vocal cord vibration and acoustical parameters in voice disorders. Prakt Otol (Kyoto) 70: 393-403
15. Hirano M (1989) Objective evaluation of the human voice: clinical aspects. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 41: 89-144
16. Imaizumi S, Hiki S, Hirano M, Matsushita H (1980) Analysis of pathological voices with a sound spectrograph. J Acoust Soc Jap 36: 9-16
17. Isshiki N, Takeuchi Y (1970) Factor analysis of hoarseness. Studia Phonologica 5: 37-44
18. Koreman J, Pützer M, Just M (2004) Correlates of varying vocal fold adduction deficiencies in perception and production: methodological and practical considerations. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 56: 305-320
19. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR (1996) The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality. J Acoust Soc Am 100: 1787-1795
20. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR (1998) Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality. J Acoust Soc Am 104 (3 Pt 1): 1598-1608
21. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR (2000) Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 108: 1867-1876
22. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Berke GS (1994) The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality. J Acoust Soc Am 96: 1291-1302
23. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Precoda K (1990) Listener experience and perception of voice quality. J Speech Hear Res 33: 103-115
24. Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Precoda K, Berke GS (1992) Individual differences in voice quality perception. J Speech Hear Res 35: 512-520
25. Müller R (1995) Heiserkeit. Ther Umsch 52: 759-762
26. Nawka T, Anders LC (1996) Die auditive Bewertung heiserer Stimmen nach dem RBH-System - Doppel-Audio CD mit Stimmbeispielen. Thieme, Stuttgart
27. Nawka T, Anders LC, Wendler J (1994) Die auditive Beurteilung heiserer Stimmen nach dem RBH-System. Sprache Stimme Gehör 18: 130-133
28. Nawka T, Franz T, Voigt M, Cebulla M (1996) Beurteilung von Ergebnissen nach indirekter phonochirurgischer Mikrolaryngoskopie. In: Gross M (Hrsg) Aktuelle phoniatrisch-pädaudiologische Aspekte. Renate Gross, Berlin, S 82-84
29. Nunez-Batalla F, Corte-Santos P, Sequeiros-Santiago G, Senaris-Gonzalez B, Suarez-Nieto C (2004) Evaluacion perceptual de la disfonia: correlacion con los parametros acusticos y fiabilidad. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 55: 282-287
30. Pützer M, Barry WJ (2004) Methodische Aspekte der auditiven Beurteilung von Stimmqualität. Sprache Stimm Gehör 28: 188-197
31. Pützer M, Masarek K (2000) Differenzierung gesunder Stimmqualitäten und Stimmqualitäten bei Rekurrensparese mit Hilfe elektroglottographischer Messungen und RBH-System. Sprache Stimme Gehör 24: 154-163
32. Rabinov CR, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Bielamowicz S (1995) Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter. J Speech Hear Res 38: 26-32
33. Revis J, Giovanni A, Triglia JM (2002) Influence of voice onset on the perceptual analysis of dysphonia. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 54: 19-25
34. Revis J, Giovanni A, Wuyts F, Triglia J (1999) Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 51: 108-116
35. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych Bull 86 (2): 420-428
36. Takahashi H, Koike Y (1976) Some perceptual dimensions and acoustical correlates of pathologic voices. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 338: 1-24
37. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, MacKenzie K, Steen N, Wilson JA (2004) The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261: 429-434
38. Wirtz M, Caspar F (2002) Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie, Göttingen
39. Wuyts FL, De-Bodt MS, Van-de-Heyning PH (1999) Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. J Voice 13: 508-517
40. Yamaguchi H, Shrivastav R, Andrews ML, Niimi S (2003) A Comparison of Voice Quality Ratings Made by Japanese and American Listeners Using the GRBAS Scale. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 55: 147-157
41. Yu P, Revis J, Wuyts FL, Zanaret M, Giovanni A (2002) Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale. Folia Phoniatr Logopaed 54: 271-281