Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: Correlation with acoustic parameters and reliability;Evaluación perceptual de la disfonía: Correlación con los parámetros acústicos y fiabilidad

Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 282-287

  Núñez Batalla, Faustino ^a,c   Corte Santos, P ^b   Sequeiros Santiago, G ^a   Senaris Gonzalez B ^a   Suarez Nieto C ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO CENTRAL DE ASTURIAS   (Spain)

^b Hospital Cabueñes Gijón   (Spain)

^c NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Dysphonia; Hoarseness; Perceptual voice evaluation; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPHONIA; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOUND DETECTION; VOCALIZATION; VOICE; ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HOARSENESS; HOSPITALIZATION; LARYNX DISORDER; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HOARSENESS; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 16544391308     PISSN: 00016519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(04)78523-4     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. De Bodt MS, Wuyts FL, Van de Heyning PH, Croux C. Test-rests study if the GRBAS scales: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. Journal of Voice 1997; 11: 74-80.
2. Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Kempster GB. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 21-40.
3. Blaustein S, Asher B. Reliability of perceptual voice assessment. J Commun Disord 1983; 16: 157-161.
4. Fex S. Perceptual evaluation. J Voice 1992; 6: 155-158.
5. Hammarberg B. Pathological voice qualities. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of a set of swedish "reference" voices. Bull Audiophonology 1992; 8: 39-52.
6. Hirano M. Clinical examination of the voice. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981: 81-84.
7. Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Precoda K, Berke GS. Individual differences en voice quality perception . J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 512-520.
8. Anders LC, Hollien H, Hurme P, Soninnen A, Wendler J. Perception of hoarseness by several classes of listeners. Folia Phoniatrica 1988; 40: 91-100.
9. Kreiman J, Geratt BR, Precoda K. Listener experience and perception of voice quality. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 103-115.
10. Abe H, Yonekawa H, Ohtq F. Reproducibility of hoarse voice psychoacoustic evaluation. Jpn J Logop Phoniatr 1986; 27: 168-177.
11. Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, de Moor GM, Wienke GH. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relavance. Folia Phoniatr 1993; 45: 76-83.
12. Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B. Differentiated perceptual qvaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
13. Titze IR. National Center for Voice and Speech. Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis. Summary Statement, Denver, 1994.
14. Kojima H, Gould W, Lambiase A, Isshiki N. Computer analysis of hoarseness. Acta Otolaryngologica 1980; 89: 547-554.
15. Yumoto E, Sasaki Y, Okamura H. Harmonics-to-noise ratio and phychophysical measurement of the degree of hoarseness. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 27: 2-6.
16. Wolfe V, Fitch J, Cornell R. Acoustic correlates of dysphonia in commonly occurring voice problems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 273-279.
17. Wolfe V, Cornell R, Palmer P. Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991; 34: 509-516.
18. Deal R, Emmanuel F. Pitch effects on vowel roughness and spectral noise. Journal of phonetics 1978; 21: 250-264.
19. Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 298-306.
20. Cavalli L, Hirson A. Diplophonia reappraised. Journal of Voice 1999; 13: 542-556.
21. Martin D, Fitch J, Wolfe V. Pathologic voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity. Journal of speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38: 765-771.
22. Millet B, Dejonkere PH. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop 1998; 50: 305-310.