Audience awareness in a technology-rich elementary classroom

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 395-419

  Baker, Elizabeth A ^a   Rozendal, Mary S ^b   Whitenack, Joy W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749454161     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10862960009548086     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson-Inman, L. (1997). OWLS: Online writing labs. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 650-654.
2. Andrew, P.G., & Musser, L.R. (1997). Collaborative design of Worldwide Web pages: A case study. Information Technology and Libraries, 16 (1), 34-38.
3. Baker, E.A. (1994, November). The public nature of elementary literacy activities in a high technology environment. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN.
4. Baker, E.A. (in press). Sociocultural theory, semiotics, and technology: Implications for the nature of literacy. Reading Improvement.
5. Baker, E.A., & Kinzer, C.K. (1998). Effects of technology on process writing: Are they all good? In T. Shanahan & F. Rodriguez-Brown (Eds.), Forty-seventh yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 428-440). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
6. Bloome, D. (1989). Beyond access: An ethnographic study of reading and writing in a seventh-grade classroom. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Classrooms and literacy (pp. 53-104). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Bruce, B.C. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 289-309.
8. Bruce, B.C., Michaels, S., & Watson-Gegeo, K. (1985). How computers can change the writing process. Language Arts, 62, 143-149.
9. Calkins, L.H. (1994). The art of teaching writing (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. Casey, J.M. (1997). Early literacy: The empowerment of technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
11. Chang, L., & Osguthorpe, R. (1990).The effects of computerized picture-word processing on kindergartner's language development. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5, 73-84.
12. Clark, H.H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 179-231). New York: Random House.
13. Clark, R.E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42 (2), 21-29.
14. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61 (1), 107-155.
15. Coley, R.J., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. (1997). Computer and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
16. Corsaro, W.A. (1985). Friendship and peer culture in the early years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Crowhurst, M., & Piche, G.L. (1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 101-109.
18. Daiute, C. (1985). Issues in using computers to socialize the writing process. Educational Communication and Technology, 33 (1), 41-50.
19. deCastell, S., & Luke, A. (1988). Defining "literacy" in North American schools: Social and historical conditions and consequences. In E.R. Kintgen, B.M. Kroll, & M. Rose (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy (pp. 159-174). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
20. DeFord, D.E. (1981). Literacy: Reading, writing, and other essentials. Language Arts, 58, 652-658.
21. Edinger, M. (1994). Empowering young writers with technology. Educational Leadership, 51 (7), 58-60.
22. Flood, J., & Lapp, D. (1995). Broadening the lens: Toward an expanded conceptualization of literacy. In K.A. Hinchman, D.J. Leu, & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.), Perspectives on literacy research and practice. Forty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 1-16). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
23. Flower, L.S., & Hayes, J.R. (1981). The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 229-243.
24. Gallini, J.K., & Helman, N. (1995). Audience awareness in technology-mediated environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 245-261.
25. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
26. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27. Graves, D., & Hansen, J. (1983). The author's chair. Language Arts, 60, 176-182.
28. Guhlin, J.M. (1996). The writing-technology connection. Technology Connection, 2 (9), 12-13.
29. Halliday, M.A.K. (1975). Learning how to mean. New York: Elsevier.
30. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
31. Harste, J.C., Woodward, V.A., & Burke, C.L. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32. Jones, I., & Pellegrini, A.D. (1996). The effects of social relationships, writing, media, and microgenetic development on first-grade students' written narratives. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 691-718.
33. Joram, E., Woodruff, E., Bryson, M., & Lindsay, P. (1992). The effects of revising with a word processor on written composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 167-193.
34. Klenow, C. (1992). Technology in writer's workshop: Teaching with technology update. Instructor, 102 (4), 61-63.
35. Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 179-211.
36. Kroll, B.M. (1986). Explaining how to play a game: The development of informative writing skills. Written Communication, 3 (2), 195-218.
37. Labbo, L. (1994). The microcomputer and emergent literacy: A case study of computer-related literacy experiences at home. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Conference, Toronto, Canada.
38. Labbo, L. (1996). A semiotic analysis of young children's symbol making in a classroom computer center. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 356-385.
39. Leland, C.H., & Harste, J.C. (1994). Multiple ways of knowing: Curriculum in a new key. Language Arts, 71, 337-345.
40. Leu, D.J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. MacArthur, C.A. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344-354.
43. Mariage, T.V. (1996). The construction and reconstruction of two discourse spaces in a special education classroom: A sociolinguistic examination of sharing chair and morning message. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
44. Melnick, S.A. (1991). Electronic encyclopedias on compact disk. Reading Teacher, 44, 432-434.
45. Neuman, S.B. (1991). Literacy in the television age: The myth of the TV effect. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
46. Nystrand, M. (1986). The structure of written communication. New York: Academic Press.
47. Peirce, C.S. (1966). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Redd-Boyd, T.M., & Slater, W.H. (1989). The effects of audience specification on undergraduates' attitudes, strategies, and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 32, 77-108.
49. Reinking, D., & Bridwell-Bowles, L. (1996). Computers in reading and writing. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 310-430). New York: Longman.
50. Resnick, D.P., & Resnick, L.B. (1977). The nature of literacy: An historical exploration. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 370-385.
51. Rowe, D.W. (1987). Literacy learning as an intertextual process. In J.E. Readence & R. Scott Baldwin (Eds.), Research in literacy: Merging perspectives. Thirty-sixth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 101-112). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
52. Rowe, D.W. (1998). The literate potentials of book-related dramatic play. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 10-35.
53. Salomon, G. (1994). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Salomon, G., Perkins, D.N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20 (3), 2-9.
55. Scardemalia, M.C., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership, 54 (3), 6-10.
56. Scardemalia, M.C., Bereiter, C., & McDonald, J.S. (1997, March). Role-taking in written communication investigated by manipulating anticipatory knowledge. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
57. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Tierney, R.J., LaZansky, J., Raphael, T., & Cohen, P. (1987). Author's intentions and reader's interpretations. In R. Tierney, P. Andes, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Understanding readers' understanding (pp. 205-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Tierney, R.J., & Shanahan, T. (1996). Research on the reading-writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 246-280). New York: Longman.
60. Waugh, M.L., Levin, J.A., & Smith, K. (1994). Organizing electronic network-based instruction interactions: Successful strategies and tactics (Part I). The Computing Teacher, 21 (5), 21-22.
61. Windschitl, M. (1998). The www and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational Researcher, 27 (1), 28-33.