Images, frames, and connectionist hierarchies

Neural Computation

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2293-2319

  Dayan, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXPERT SYSTEM; FACE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

CLASSIFICATION; EXPERT SYSTEMS; FACE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; TENSORS; UNSUPERVISED LEARNING;

DISTRIBUTED PATTERNS; IMAGE FRAMES; KNOWLEDGE-REPRESENTATION; MULTILINEAR MODELS; PRODUCT IDEAS; STRUCTURED KNOWLEDGE; TENSOR PRODUCTS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 33749453122     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.10.2293     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Amit, Y., & Mascaro, M. (2003). An integrated network for invariant visual detection and recognition. Vision Research, 43, 2073-2088.
2. Amit, Y., & Trouvé, A. (2005). POP: Patchwork of parts models for object recognition. Unpublished technical report. Available online from http://galton.uchicago.edu/amit/Papers/pop.pdf.
3. Beymer, D., & Poggio, T. (1996). Image representations for visual learning. Science, 272, 1905-1909.
4. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In SIGGRAPH'99 (pp. 187-194). New York: ACM Computer Society Press.
5. Bridgeman, B., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Velichkovsky, B. (1994). Visual stability and saccadic eye movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 247-258.
6. Burl, M. C., Leung, T. K., & Perona, P. (1995). Face localization via shape statistics. In M. Bichsel (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (pp. 154-159). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
7. Burl, M., Weber, M., & Perona, P. (1998). A probabilistic approach to object recognition using local photometry and global geometry. Berlin: Springer.
8. Connor, C. E., Gallant, J. L., Preddie, D. C., & Van Essen, D. C. (1996). Responses in area V4 depend on the spatial relationship between stimulus and attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 75, 1306-1308.
9. Crandall, D., Felzenszwalb, P., & Huttenlocher, D. (2005). Spatial priors for part-based recognition using statistical models. Proceedings of the International Coference of Computer Vision and Pattern. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
10. Dayan, P., Hinton, G. E., Neal, R. M., & Zemel, R. S. (1995). The Helmholtz machine. Neural Computation, 7, 889-904.
11. De Lathauwer, L. (1997). Signal processing based on multilinear algebra. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universitiet Leuven, Belgium.
12. N) reduction in multilinear algebra. Linear Algebra Applications, 391, 31-55.
13. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B39, 1-38.
14. Deneve, S., & Pouget, A. (2003). Basis functions for object-centered representations. Neuron, 37, 347-359.
15. Dolan, C. P. (1989). Tensor manipulation networks: Connectionist and symbolic approaches to comprehension, learning and planning (Tech. Rep. UCLA-AI-89-06). Los Angeles: Computer Science Department, AI Lab, UCLA.
16. Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Fei-Fei, L., Fergus, R., & Perona, P. (2003). A Bayesian approach to unsupervised oneshot learning of object categories. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision ICCV (Vol. 1). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
18. Fergus, R., Perona, P., & Zisserman, A. (2003). Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
19. Fischler, M. A., & Elschlager, R. A. (1973). The representation and matching of pictorial structures. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 22, 67-92.
20. Gayler, R. W. (1998). Multiplicative binding, representation operators and analogy. In K. Holyoak & D. Gentner (Eds.), Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences. Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University.
21. Grenander, U. (1976-1981). Lectures in pattern theory I, II and III: Pattern analysis, pattern synthesis and regular structures. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
22. Grimes, D. B., & Rao, R. P. N. (2005). Bilinear sparse coding for invariant vision. Neural Computation, 17, 47-73.
23. Hinton, G. E. (1989). Learning distributed representations of concepts. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 46-61). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Hinton, G. E. (1990). Mapping part-whole hierarchies into connectionist networks. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 47-76.
25. Hinton, G. E. (Ed.). (1991). Connectionist symbol processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Hinton, G. E., Dayan, P., & Revow, M. (1997). Modeling the manifolds of images of handwritten digits. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8, 65-74.
27. Hinton, G. E., & Ghahramani, Z. (1997). Generative models for discovering sparse distributed representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 352, 1177-1190.
28. Hinton, G. E., & Zemel, R. S. (1994). Autoencoders, minimum description length and Helmholtz free energy. In J. D. Cowan, G. Tesauro, & J. Alspector (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 6 (pp. 3-10). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
29. Kanerva, P. (1996). Binary spatter-coding of ordered K-tuples. In C. von der Malsburg, W. von Seelen, J. C. Vorbrüggen, & B. Sendhoff (Eds.), Proceedings of ICANN 1996 (pp. 869-873). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
30. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1997). The generic bilinear calibration-estimation problem. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23, 217-234.
31. Kolda, T. G. (2001). Orthogonal tensor decompositions. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 23, 243-255.
32. Koller, D., & Pfeffer, A. (1998). Probabilistic frame-based systems. In Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 580-587). Madison, WI: AAAI Press.
33. Liebe, B., & Schiele, B. (2003). Interleaved object categorization and segmentation. In British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC'03). Norwich, UK.
34. Liebe, B., & Schiele, B. (2004). Scale invariant object categorization using a scaleadaptive mean-shift search. In DAGM'04 Annual Pattern Recognition Symposium (pp. 145-153). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
35. Linsker, R. (1988). Self-organization in a perceptual network. Computer, 21, 105-117.
36. MacKay, D. M. (1956). The epistemological problem for automata. In C. E. Shannon & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Automata studies (pp. 235-251). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Milch, B., Marthi, B., & Russell, S. (2004). BLOG: Relational modeling with unknown objects. In Proceedings of the ICML-04 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning. Banff, Canada: International Machine Learning Society.
38. Mjolsness, E. (1990). Bayesian inference on visual grammars by neural nets that optimize (Tech. Rep. YALEU/DCS/TR-854). New Haven, CT: Computer Science Department, Yale University.
39. Mumford, D. (1994). Neuronal architectures for pattern-theoretic problems. In C. Koch & J. Davis (Eds.), Large-scale theories of the cortex (pp. 125-152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
41. Olshausen, B. A., Anderson, C. H., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 4700-4719.
42. Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996). Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381, 607-609.
43. Paccanaro, A., & Hinton, G. E. (2001). Learning distributed representation of concepts using linear relational embedding. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13, 232-245.
44. Plate, T. A. (1995). Holographic reduced representations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 6, 623-641.
45. Plate, T. A. (2003). Holographic reduced representations. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
46. Poggio, T. (1990). A theory of how the brain might work. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 55, 899-910.
47. Pollack, J. B. (1990). Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 77-105.
48. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. S. (2000). Computation with population codes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 125-132.
49. Pouget, A., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1997). Spatial transformations in the parietal cortex using basis functions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 222-237.
50. Rachkovskij, D. A., & Kussul, E. M. (2001). Binding and normalization of binary sparse distributed representations by context-dependent thinning. Neural Computation, 13, 411-452.
51. Rao, R. P. N., Olshausen, B. A., & Lewicki, M. S. (2002). Probabilistic models of the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Revow, M., Williams, C. K. I., & Hinton, G. E. (1996). Using generative models for handwritten digit recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18, 592-606.
53. Riesenhuber, M., & Dayan, P. (1996). Neural models for part-whole hierarchies. In M. C. Mozer, M. I. Jordan, & T. Petsche (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 9 (pp. 17-23). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Riesenhuber, M., Jarudi I., Gilad, S., & Sinha, P. (2004). Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B (Suppl.), 271, S448-S450.
55. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1019-1025.
56. Salinas, E., & Abbott, L. F. (1997). Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 3267-3272.
57. Schiele, B., & Crowley, J. L. (1996). Probabilistic object recognition using multidimensional receptive field histograms. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
58. Schiele, B., & Crowley, J. L. (2000). Recognition without correspondence using multidimensional receptive field histograms. International Journal of Computer Vision, 36, 31-50.
59. Schneiderman, H., & Kanade, T. (2004). Object detection using the statistics of parts. International Journal of Computer Vision, 56, 151-177.
60. Smolensky, P. (1990). Tensor product variable binding and the representation of symbolic structures in connectionist systems. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 159-216.
61. Sperduti, A. (1994). Labeling RAAM Connection Science, 6, 429-459.
62. Sudderth, E. B., Torralba, A., Freeman, W. T., & Willsky, A. S. (2005). Learning hierarchical models of scenes, objects and parts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
63. Tenenbaum, J. B., & Freeman, W. T. (2000). Separating style and content with bilinear models. Neural Computation, 12, 1247-1283.
64. Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279-311.
65. Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991). Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 71-86.
66. Vasilescu, M. A. O., & Terzopoulos, D. (2002). Multilinear analysis of image ensembles: TensorFaces. In A. Heyden, G. Sparr, M. Nielsen, & P. Johansen (Eds.), Computer vision (pp. 447-460). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
67. Vasilescu, M. A. O., & Terzopoulos, D. (2003). Multilinear subspace analysis for image ensembles. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, CVPR '03 (Vol. 2, pp. 93-99). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
68. Vasilescu, M. A. O., & Terzopoulos, D. (2005). Multilinear independent components analysis. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, CVPR '05 (Vol. 2, pp. 547-553). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
69. Vetter, T., & Poggio, T. (1997). Linear object classes and image synthesis froma single example image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, 733-742.
70. von der Malsburg, C. (1988). Pattern recognition by labelled graph matching. Neural Networks, 1, 141-148.