Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval processing: Effects of consistent versus inconsistent retrieval demands

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1531-1544

  Johnson, Jeffrey D ^a   Rugg, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THINKING; VERBAL MEMORY; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MENTAL RECALL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REFERENCE VALUES; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33749451801     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1531     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Electroencephalographic Society. (1994). Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 11, 111-113.
2. Anderson, M. C., & Bjork, R. A. (1994). Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 265-325). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Dzulkifli, M. A., Sharpe, H. L., & Wilding, E. L. (2004). Separating item-related electrophysiological indices of retrieval effort and retrieval orientation. Brain and Cognition, 55, 433-443.
4. Greenhouse, G. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of repeated measures designs. Psychometrika, 49, 95-112.
5. Henson, R. N., Rylands, A., Ross, E., Vuilleumeir, P., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage, 21, 1674-1689.
6. Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 843-854.
7. Herron, J. E., & Wilding, E. L. (2004). An electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation. Neuroimage, 22, 1554-1562.
8. Herron, J. E., & Wilding, E. L. (2006). Neural correlates of control processes engaged before and during recovery of information from episodic memory. Neuroimage, 30, 634-644.
9. Hornberger, M., Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: Effects of study-test similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1196-1210.
10. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
11. Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 852-857.
12. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89.
13. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Nolde, S. F. (1997). Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring. NeuroReport, 24, 1317-1320.
14. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
15. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
16. Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Getting ready to remember: The neural correlates of task set during recognition memory. NeuroReport, 13, 149-152.
17. Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). Effects of age on retrieval cue processing as revealed by ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1525-1542.
18. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
19. Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (1999). Frontal brain potentials during recognition are modulated by requirements to retrieve perceptual detail. Neuron, 22, 605-613.
20. Robb, W. G. K., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval orientation and retrieval effort. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 583-589.
21. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
22. Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 664-678.
23. Rugg, M. D., Otten, L. J., & Henson, R. N. (2002). The neural basis of episodic memory: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 357, 1097-1110.
24. Rugg, M. D., & Wilding, E. L. (2000). Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 108-115.
25. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
26. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
28. Werkle-Bergner, M., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J., Meyer, P., & Düzel, E. (2005). The control of memory retrieval: Insights from event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 599-614.
29. Wilding, E. L. (1999). Separating retrieval strategies from retrieval success: An event-related potential study of source memory. Neuropsychologia, 37, 441-454.
30. Wilding, E. L., & Nobre, A. C. (2001). Task-switching and memory retrieval processing: Electrophysiological evidence. NeuroReport, 12, 3613-3637.
31. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.