Assessment of needs of men for decision support on male sterilization

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 63, Issue 3 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 301-307

  Baldé, Abdoul ^a   Légaré, France ^b   Labrecque, Michel ^b  

^a PRISM Guinée   (Guinea)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Decision aids; Decision making; Male sterilization; Needs assessment; Vasectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; MALE; MALE STERILIZATION; PARENTHOOD; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONAL VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; VASECTOMY;

EID: 33749443729     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Population Reference Bureau. Family Planning Worldwide, 2002 Data Sheet. Data and estimates of contraceptive use and related reproductive health indicators for the countries and regions of the world, 2002. Accessed on January 15, 2006. Available at http://www.prb.org/pdf/FamPlanWorldwide_Eng.pdf.
2. Engenderhealth. Contraceptive Sterilization: global issues and trends. New York; 2002.
3. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Male and female sterilisation. National evidence-based clinical guideline number 4, 2004. Accessed on April 2, 2004. Available at http://www.rcog.org.uk/resources/Public/Sterilisation_full.pdf.
4. Statistiques Québec. L'Institut de la statistique du Québec. Accessed on April 4, 2006. Available at http://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/donstat/societe/demographie/naisn_deces/naissance/415.htm.
5. Holman C.D., Wisniewski Z.S., Semmens J.B., Rouse I.L., and Bass A.J. Population-based outcomes after 28,246 in-hospital vasectomies and 1902 vasovasostomies in Western Australia. BJU Int 86 (2000) 1043-1049
6. Sneyd M.J., Cox B., Paul C., and Skegg D.C. High prevalence of vasectomy in New Zealand. Contraception 64 (2001) 155-159
7. Pitaktepsombati P., and Janowitz B. Sterilization acceptance and regret in Thailand. Contraception 44 (1991) 623-637
8. Miller W.B., Shain R.N., and Pasta D.J. The pre-and poststerilization predictors of poststerilization regret in husbands and wives. J Nerv Ment Dis 179 (1991) 602-608
9. Rungby J.A., Dahl H.B., Krogh J., and Kvist E. Vasectomy: who regret it and why?. Ugeskr Laeger 156 (1994) 2377-2380
10. Holden C.A., McLachlan R.I., Cumming R., Wittert G., Handelsman D.J., de Kretser D.M., and Pitts M. Sexual activity, fertility and contraceptive use in middle-aged and older men: men in Australia telephone survey (MATeS). Hum Reprod 20 (2005) 3429-3434
11. O'Connor A.M., Drake E.R., Wells G.A., Tugwell P., Laupacis A., and Elmslie T. A survey of the decision-making needs of Canadians faced with complex health decisions. Health Expect 6 (2003) 97-109
12. O'Connor A.M., Tugwell P., Wells G.A., Elmslie T., Jolly E., Hollingworth G., McPherson R., Bunn H., Graham I., and Drake E. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 33 (1998) 267-279
13. Légaré F., O'Connor A.M., Graham I.D., Wells G.A., Jacobsen M.J., Elmslie T., and Drake ER. The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physicians' decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy. Patient Educ Couns 50 (2003) 211-221
14. O'Connor A.M., Stacey D., Entewistle V., Llewellyn-Thomas H., Rovner D., Holmes-Rovner M., Tait V., Tetroe J., Fiset V., Barry M., and Jones J. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane library, Issue 4 (2005), John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK
15. International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Accessed on January 14, 2006. Available at http://ipdas.ohri.ca/index.html.
16. O'Connor A, Jacobsen MJ. Workbook on developing and evaluating patient decision aids, 2003. Accessed on April 4, 2006. Available at http://www.decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/devdaAug2003.pdf.
17. Deslauriers J.-P. Recherche qualitative. Guide pratique (1991), McGraw-Hill, Montréal
18. O'Connor A. Decisional conflict scale. 4th ed. (1999), University of Ottawa, Ottawa
19. User manual-decisional conflict scale(s). Ottawa Health Research Institute. Accessed on April 4, 2006. Available at http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/Eval_Meas/User_Manuals/UM_DecConflict2006.pdf.
20. Waters A. Évaluation d'un support d'aide à la décision en regard de l'hormonothérapie substitutive [Dissertation], Ottawa (ON): University of Ottawa; 1998.
21. Lipkus I.M., Klein W.M., and Rimer B.K. Communicating breast cancer risks to women using different formats. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 10 (2001) 895-898
22. Weinfurt K.P., Depuy V., Castel L.D., Sulmasy D.P., Schulman K.A., and Meropol N.J. Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer 103 (2005) 140-147
23. Schwartz L.M., Woloshin S., Black W.C., and Welch H.G. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 127 (1997) 966-972
24. Towle A., and Godolphin W. Education and training of health care professionals. In: Edwards A., and Elwyn G. (Eds). Evidence-based patient choice inevitable or impossible? (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford 245-270
25. Towle A., and Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. Brit Med J 319 (1999) 766-771