Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: Evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 63, Issue 3 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 336-349

  Edwards, Adrian ^a   Thomas, Richard ^b   Williams, Rhys ^b   Ellner, Andrew L ^c   Brown, Polly ^d   Elwyn, Glyn ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d BMJ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Qualitative; Randomized controlled trial; Representation formats; Risk communication

Indexed keywords

INSULIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS; EXPERIENCE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION; RATING SCALE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THERMOMETER;

EID: 33749443293     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Edwards A. Communicating risks: means that patients too have to learn to live with uncertainty. Br Med J 327 (2003) 691-692
2. Schwartz L., Woloshin S., and Welch G. Risk communication in clinical practice: Putting cancer in context. J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 25 (1999) 124-133
3. Julian-Reynier C., Welkenhuysen M., Hagoel L., Decruyenaere M., and Hopwood P. Risk communication strategies: state of the art and effectiveness in the context of cancer genetic services. Eur J Hum Gen 11 (2003) 725-736
4. Edwards A., Hood K., Matthews E.J., Russell D., Russell I.T., Barker J., Pill R., and Stott N. The effectiveness of one-to-one risk communication interventions in health care: a systematic review. Medical Decision Making 20 (2000) 290-297
5. Edwards A., Elwyn G., Covey J., Mathews E., and Pill R. Presenting risk information-a review of the effects of 'framing' and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun 6 (2001) 61-82
6. Skolbekken J.A. Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs. Br Med J 316 (1998) 1956-1958
7. Misselbrook D., and Armstrong D. Patients' responses to risk information about the benefits of treating hypertension. Br J Gen Practice 51 (2001) 276-279
8. O'Connor A, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, Tait V, Tetroe J, Fiset V, Barry M, Jones J. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [Cochrane Review]. Update Software: Cochrane Library 2003 (2).
9. Murray E, Burns J, See T, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Library 2005.
10. Epstein R., Alper B., and Quill T. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. J Am Med Assoc 291 (2004) 2359-2366
11. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research G. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 329 (1993) 977-986
12. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group U. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352 (1998) 837-853
13. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group U. Effects of Intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 352 (1998) 854-865
14. Lawton J., Parry O., Peel E., and Douglas M. Diabetes service provision: a qualitative study of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients: experiences and views. Diab Med 22 (2005) 1246-1251
15. NHS Direct Online Health Encyclopaedia-Diabetes; 2005. http://www.nhsdirect.nhs.uk/en.asp?TopicID=157.
16. Gigerenzer G., and Edwards A. Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. Br Med J 327 (2003) 741-744
17. Adams A., and Smith A. Risk perception and communication: recent developments and implications for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 56 (2001) 745-755
18. Edwards A., Matthews E., Pill R.M., and Bloor M. Communication about risk: diversity among primary care professionals. Fam Practice 15 (1998) 296-300
19. Timmermans D., Molewijk B., Stiggelbout A., and Kievit J. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Pat Educ Counseling 55 (2003) 16-21
20. Mazur D.J. Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medical clinic. J Gen Int Med 5 (1990) 402-405
21. Lipkus I.M., and Hollands J.G. The visual communication of risk. J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 25 (1999) 149-162
22. Brundage M., Feldman-Stewart D., Leis A., Bezjak A., Degner L., Velji K., Zetes-Zanatta L., Tu D., Ritvo P., and Pater J. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 6949-6956
23. Fortin J., Hirota L., Bond B., O'Connor A., and Col N. Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: A descriptive pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decision Making 1 (2001). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/1/2
24. Freeman T., and Bass M. Risk language preferred by mothers in considering a hypothetical new vaccine for their children. Can Med Assoc J 147 (1992) 1013-1017
25. Edwards A., Elwyn G., and Mulley A.G. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. Br Med J 324 (2002) 827-830
26. Feldman-Stewart D., and Brundage M. Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Pat Educ Counseling 54 (2004) 265-273
27. Edwards A., and Elwyn G. How should 'effectiveness' of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Med Decision Making 19 (1999) 428-434
28. Dowding J., Swanson V., Bland R., Thomson P., Mair C., Morrison A., Taylor A., Beechey C., Simpson R., and Niven K. The development and preliminary evaluation of a decision aid based on decision analysis for two treatment conditions: benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension. Pat Educ Counseling 52 (2004) 209-215
29. Booth G. Short-term clinical consequences of diabetes in adults. In: Gerstein H., and Haynes R. (Eds). Evidence-based diabetes care (2001), BC Decker Inc, Hamilton, Ont. 71-78
30. Edwards A., Hood K., Matthews E.J., Russell D., Russell I.T., Barker J., et al. The effectiveness of one-to-one risk communication interventions in health care: a systematic review. Med Decision Making 20 (2000) 290-297
31. Bastani R., Maxwell A., Bradford C., Das I., and Yan K. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med 29 (1999) 355-364
32. Champion V., and Maraj M. Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in non-adherent older women. Prev Med 36 (2003) 150-158
33. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decision Making 15 (1995) 25-30
34. O'Connor A. Decisional conflict scale (manual). 4th ed. (1999), Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa
35. Edwards A., Elwyn G., Hood K., Robling M., Atwell C., Russell I., and Holmes-Rovner M. The development of COMRADE-a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision-making in consultations. Pat Educ Counseling 50 (2003) 311-322
36. Michie S., McDonald V., and Marteau T.M. Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction. Pat Educ Counseling 32 (1997) 101-106
37. Denzin N., and Lincoln Y. Strategies of qualitative inquiry (1998), SAGE, California
38. Crabtree B.F., and Miller W.L. Doing qualitative research (1992), SAGE, London
39. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Southampton: Health Technology Assessment NHS R&D Programme; 1999. p. 1-276.
40. Mazur D. Ch 20: What level of understanding do patients want in shared decision making?. Shared decision making in the patient physician relationship (2001), American College of Physician Executives, Tampa, FL p. 185-90
41. McAlindon T., Formica M., Kabbara K., LaValley M., and Lehmner M. Conducting clinical trials over the internet: feasibility study. Br Med J 327 (2003) 484-487
42. Schapira M., Nattinger A., and McHorney C. Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care. Med Decision Making 21 (2001) 459-467
43. Edwards A., Unigwe S., Elwyn G., and Hood K. Personalised risk communication in health screening programs: a Cochrane systematic review. Br Med J 327 (2003) 703-707
44. Man-Son-Hing M., O'Connor A., Drake E., Biggs J., Hum V., and Laupacis A. The effect of qualitative and quantitative presentation of probability estimates on patient decision making: a randomised trial. Health Expect 5 (2002) 246-255
45. Makoul G., Arntson P., and Schofield T. Health promotion in primary care: physician-patient communication and decision making about prescription medications. Soc Sci Med 41 (1995) 1241-1254
46. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Hood K., Robling M., Atwell C., Russell I., Wensing M., and Grol R. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomised controlled trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Practice 21 (2004) 335-344
47. Edwards A., Matthews E., Pill R.M., and Bloor M. Communication about risk: the responses of primary care professionals to standardising the language of risk and communication tools. Fam Practice 15 (1998) 301-307
48. Calman K., and Royston G. Risk language dialects. Br Med J 315 (1997) 939-942
49. Feldman-Stewart D., Kocovski N., McCullough L.B., Brundage M.D., and Mackillop W. Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Med Decision Making 20 (2000) 228-238
50. Murphy D., O'Keefe Z., and Kaufman A. Improving comprehension and recall of information for an HIV vaccine trial among women at risk for HIV: reading level simplifcation and inclusion of pictures to illustrate key concepts. AIDS Educ Prev 11 (1999) 389-399
51. Wright P., John C., and Belt S. Designing an interactive decision explorer. Inform Design J Document Design 11 (2003) 252-260
52. Wagner T., Bundorf M., Singer S., and Baker L. Free internet access, the digital divide, and health information. Med Care 43 (2005) 415-420