Visualizing intersecting surfaces with nested-surface techniques

Proceedings of the IEEE Visualization Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 64-

  Weigle, Chris ^a   Taylor II, Russell M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Intersecting surfaces; Nested surfaces; Perception; Scientific visualization; Transparent surfaces; Two surface visualization; User study

Indexed keywords

INTERSECTING SURFACES; NESTED SURFACES; SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION; TRANSPARENT SURFACES; TWO-SURFACE VISUALIZATION;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; CONFORMAL MAPPING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; SENSORY PERCEPTION; SURFACE STRUCTURE; TUMORS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 33749425526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/VIS.2005.126     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. A.Blake and H. Bülthoff. Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature, 343:165-168, 1990.
2. U. Castiello. Implicit processing of shadows. Vision Research, 41:2305-2309, 2001.
3. P. Cavanagh and Y. Leclerc. Shape from shadows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(1):3-27, 1989.
4. C. G. Christou and J. J. Koenderink. Light source dependence in shape from shading. Vision research, 37(11): 1441-1449, 1997.
5. B. Gumming, E. Johnston, and A. Parker. Effects of different texture cues on curved surfaces viewed stereoscopically. Vision Research, 33(5/6):827-838, 1993.
6. W. Curran and A. Johnston. The effect of illuminant position on perceived curvature. Vision research, 36(10): 1399-1410, 1996.
7. E. De Haan, R. G. F. Erens, and A. J. Noest. Shape from shaded random surfaces. Vision research, 35(21):2985-3001, 1995.
8. J. Diepstraten, D. Weiskopf, and T. Ertl. Transparency in interactive technical illustration. Computer Graphics Forum, 21(3), 2002.
9. J. Diepstraten, D. Weiskopf, and T. Ertl. Interactive cutaway illustrations. Computer Graphics Forum, 22(3):523-532, 2003.
10. R. Erens, A. Kappers, and J. Koenderink. Perception of local shape from shading. Perception and Psychphysics, 54:145-147, 1993.
11. C. Everitt. Interactive order-independant transparency. Technical report, Nvidia, 2001.
12. J. J. Gibson. The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1950.
13. J. Goldfeather, S. Molnar, G. Turk, and H. Fuchs. Near real-time CSG rendering using tree normalization and geometric pruning. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 9(3):20-28, 1989.
14. C. Healey. Choosing effective colours for data visualization. In Proceedings of Visualization '96, pages 263-270. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.
15. V. Interrante, H. Fuchs, and S. Pizer. Conveying the 3d shape of smoothly curving transparent surfaces via texture. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(2):98-l 17, 1997.
16. A. Johnston and W. Curran. Investigating shape-from-shading illusions using solid objects. Vision research, 36(18):2827-2835, 1996.
17. S. Kim, H. Hagh-Shenas, and V. Interrante. Showing shape with texture: two directions seem better than one. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VIII, pages 332-339. SPIE, 2003.
18. S. Kim, H. Hagh-Shenas, and V. Interrante. Conveying shape with texture: experimental investigations of texture's effects on shape categorization judgments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 10(4):471-483, 2004.
19. D. Knill, P. Mamassian, and D. Kersten. Geometry of shadows. Journal of the Optical Society of Ameriaca, 14(12):3216-3232, 1997.
20. J. J. Koenderink and A. Van Doom. Relief: pictoral and otherwise. Image and Vision Computing, 13(5):321-334, 1995.
21. M. S. Langer and H. H. Bülthoff. Measuring visual shape using computer graphics psychophysics. In Proceedings of Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, pages 1-9. Springer, 2000.
22. A. Li and O. Zaidi. Perception of three-dimensional shape from texture is based on patterns of oriented energy. Vision Research, 40:217-242, 2000.
23. P. Mamassian and D. Kersten. Illumination, shading and the perception of local orientation. Vision research, 36(15):2351-2367, 1996.
24. P. Mamassian, D. Knill, and D. Kersten. The perception of cast shadows. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2(8):288-295, 1998.
25. F. Nooruddin and G. Turk. Interior/exterior classification of polygonal models. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 00, pages 415-422, 2000.
26. B. T. Phong. Illumination for computer generated pictures. Communications of the ACM, 18:311-317, 1975.
27. V. Ramachandran. Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American, 259:58-65, 1988.
28. P. Rheingans. Opacity-modulating triangular textures for irregular surfaces. In Proceedings of Visualization '96, pages 219-225. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.
29. M. Robinson and K. Robbins. Towards perceptual enhancement of multiple intersecting surfaces. In Visualization and Data Analysis, pages 339-349, 2005.
30. G. Sweet and C. Ware. View direction, surface orientation and texture orientation for perception of surface shape. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004, 2004.
31. J. T. Todd and A. H. Domes. Generic and non-generic conditions for the perception of surface shape from texture. Vision Research, 42(7):837-850, 2002.
32. C. Ware. Color sequences for univariate maps: Theory, experiments and principles. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, pages 41-49, September 1988.
33. C. Ware. Information visualization: Perception for design, 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.