Characterization of background concentrations of contaminants using a mixture of normal distributions

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 19, 2006, Pages 6021-6025

  Qian, Song S ^a   Lyons, Regan E ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN METHOD; NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; IMPURITIES;

POLLUTION DETECTION;

CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; IMPURITIES; POLLUTION DETECTION;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA SET; POLLUTANT;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAW; POLLUTANT; TECHNIQUE; UNITED STATES;

BAYES THEOREM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HAZARDOUS WASTE; LEAD; MERCURY; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REFERENCE VALUES; SOIL POLLUTANTS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

EID: 33749395357     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0606071     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. I.; Human health evaluation manual (Part A); Technical Report, EPA 540-1-89-002; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. EPA: Washington DC, 1989.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidiance for comparing background and chemical concentrations in soil for CERCLA sites; Technical Report, EPA 540-R-01-003, OSWER9285.7-41; Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, U.S. EPA: Washington DC, 2002.
3. Naval Facilities Engineering Cammand (NAVFAC). Guidance for environmental background analysis; Volume I. Soil. NFESC User's Guide; Technical Report UG-2049-ENV; NAVFAC: Washington, DC, 2002.
4. Lindley, D. V. A statistical paradox. Biometrika 1957, 44, 187-192.
5. Dixon, W. J. Analysis of extreme values. Ann. Math. Stat. 1950, 21 (4), 488-506.
6. Newcomb, S. A generalized theory of the combination of observations so as to obtain the best result. Am. J. Math. 1886, 8, 343-366.
7. Pearson, K. Contribution to the mathematical theory of evolution. Philo. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1894, 185, 71-110.
8. Titterington, D. M.; Smith, A. F. M.; Makov, U. E. Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions; Wiley: New York, 1985.
9. Casella, G.; Mengerse, K. L.; Robert, C. P.; Titterington, D. M. Perfect samplers for mixtures of distributions. J. R. Stat. Soc., B 2002, 64, 777-790.
10. Robert, C. P. Mixtures of distributions: inference and estimation. In: Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice; Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., Spiegelhalter, D. J.; Chapman & Hall: London, 1996.
11. ARCADIS G & M Inc. Final Background Characterization Report: Lake City Army Ammunition Plant, Independence, Missouri; Technical Report; Arcadis G & M, Inc.: Tulsa, OK, 2005.
12. Ott, W. R. Environmental Statistics and Data Analysis; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
13. Limpert, E.; Stahel, W. A.; Abbt, M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 2001, 51 (5), 341-352.
14. Singh, A. K.; Singh, A.; Engelhardt, M. The lognormal distribution in environmental applications. Technology Support Center Issue, EPA/600/R-97/006; United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Washington, DC, 1997.
15. Little, R. J. A.; Rubin, D. B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edition; Wiley: New York, 2002.
16. Lockwood, J. R.; Schervish, M. J.; Gurian, P.; Small, M. J. Characterization of arsenic occurrence in source waters of U.S. community water system. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2001, 96 (456), 1184-1193.
17. Qian, S. S.; Schulman, A.; Koplos, J.; Kotros A.; Keller, P. A hierarchical modeling approach for estimating national distributions of chemicals in public drinking water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1176-1182.
18. Lunn, D. J.; Thomas, A.; Best, N.; Spiegelhalter, D. Winbugs - a Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 2000, 10 (4), 325-337.
19. Spiegelhalter, D.; Thomas, A.; Best, N.; Lunn, D. WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs, 2003.
20. Gelman, A.; Rubin, D. B. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 1992, 7, 457-511.
21. Helsel, D. R. Less than obvious. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24 (12), 1767-1774.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance for data quality assessment, practical methods for data analysis; Technical Report EPA/600/R-96/084, EPA QA/G-9, QA00 Update.; Office of Environmental Information: Washington, DC., 2000.
23. Dixon, W. J. Processing data for outliers. Biometrics 1953, 9 (1), 74-89.
24. Rosner, B. On the detection of many outliers. Technometrics 1975, 17 (2), 221-227.
25. Cleveland, W. S. Visualizing Data; Hobart Press: Summit, NJ, 1993.