Bergmann's rule and the terrestrial caecilian Schistometopum thomense (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae)

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1049-1059

  Measey, G John ^a   Van Dongen, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Altitude; Bergmann's rule; Burrowing; Gymnophiona

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; CAECILIA; CAECILIIDAE (AMPHIBIA); GYMNOPHIONA; SCHISTOMETOPUM THOMENSE;

EID: 33749376232     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Angilletta, M.J. and Dunham, A.E. 2003. The temperature-size rule in ectotherms: simple evolutionary explanations may not be general. Am. Nat., 162: 332-342.
2. Ashton, K.G. 2001. Are ecological and evolutionary rules being dismissed prematurely? Diversity and Distributions, 7: 289-295.
3. Ashton, K.G. 2002a. Do amphibians follow Bergmann's rule? Can. J. Zool., 80: 708-716.
4. Ashton, K.G. 2002b. Patterns of within-species body size variation of birds: strong evidence for Bergmann's rule. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 11: 505-523.
5. Atkinson, D. and Sibly, R.M. 1997. Why are organisms usually bigger in colder environments? Making sense of a life history puzzle. Trends Ecol. Evol., 12: 235-239.
6. Barry, R.G. and Chorley, R.J. 1992. Atmosphere, Weather and Climate. London: Routledge.
7. Bernardo, J. 1994. Experimental analysis of allocation in two divergent, natural salamander populations. Am. Nat., 143: 14-38.
8. Delêtre, M. and Measey, G.J. 2004. Sexual selection vs. ecological causation in a sexually dimorphic caecilian, Schistometopum thomense (Amphibia Gymnophiona Caeciliidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 16: 243-253.
9. Drewes, R.C. and Stoelting, R.E. 2004. The California Academy of Sciences Gulf of Guinea Expedition (2001) ii. Additions and corrections to our knowledge of the endemic amphibians of São Tomé and Prĩncipe. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., 55: 573-587.
10. Ducey, P.K., Formanowicz, D.R., Boyet, L., Mailloux, J. and Nussbaum, R.A. 1993. Experimental examination of burrowing behavior in caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona): effects of soil compaction on burrowing ability of four species. Herpetologica, 49: 450-457.
11. Freidenburg, L.K. and Skelly, D.K. 2004. Microgeographical variation in thermal preference by an amphibian. Ecol. Lett., 7: 369-373.
12. Gascoigne, A. 2004. São Tomé, Principe, and Annobon moist lowland forests. In Terrestrial Ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: A Conservation Assessment (N. Burgess, J. D'Amico Hales, E. Underwood, E. Dinerstein, D. Olson, I. Itoua et al., eds.), pp. 236-238. Washington, DC: Island Press.
13. Greef, R. 1884. Ueber Siphonops thomensis Barboza du Bocage - Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Caecilien (Gymnophionen). Sitzungsberichte der Gesselschaft zur Beförderung der gesammten. Naturwissenschaften, 1: 15-32.
14. Haft, J. 1992. Bemerkungen zu den Blindwühlen der Gattung Schistometopum von Sao Tome (Gymnophiona, Caecilidae). Bonner Zoologische Beitraege, 43: 477-479.
15. Haft, J. and Franzen, M. 1996. Freilandbeobachtungen, Verhalten und Nachzucht der São Tomé-Blindwühle Schistometopum thomense (Bocage, 1873). Herpetofauna, 18: 5-11.
16. Himstedt, W. 1996. Die Blindwühlen. Magdeburg: Westarp- Wissenschaften.
17. Hone, D.W.E. and Benton, M.J. 2005. The evolution of large size: how does Cope's Rule work? Trends Ecol. Evol., 20: 4-6.
18. Hota, A.K. 1994. Growth in amphibians. Gerontology, 40: 147-160.
19. Jones, P.J. 1994. Biodiversity in the Gulf of Guinea: an overview. Biodivers. Conserv., 3: 772-785.
20. Kupfer, A., Nabhitabhata, J. and Himstedt, W. 2005. Life history of amphibians in the seasonal tropics: habitat, community and population ecology of a caecilian (Genus Ichthyophis). J. Zool. Lond., 266: 237-247.
21. Laugen, A.T., Laurila, A., Jonsson, K.I., Soderman, F. and Merila, J. 2005. Do common frogs (Rana temporaria) follow Bergmann's rule? Evol. Ecol. Res., 7: 717-731.
22. Lavelle, P. and Spain, A.V. 2001. Soil Ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
23. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. and Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS Systemfor Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
24. Mayr, E. 1956. Geographical character gradients and climatic adaptation. Evolution, 10: 105-108.
25. Measey, G.J. 2004. Are caecilians rare? An East African perspective. J. East Afr. Nat. Hist., 93: 1-21.
26. Measey, G.J. and Barot, S. 2006. Evidence of seasonal migration in a tropical subterranean vertebrate. J. Zool. Lond., 269: 29-37.
27. Measey, G.J. and Di-Bernardo, M. 2003. Estimating juvenile abundance in a population of the semiaquatic caecilian, Chthonerpeton indistinctum (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Typhlonectidae), in southern Brazil. J. Herpetol., 37: 371-373.
28. Measey, G.J., Silva, J. and Di-Bernardo, M. 2003. Testing for repeatability in measurements of length and mass in Chthonerpeton indistinctum (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), including a novel method of calculating total length of live caecilians. Herpetol. Rev., 34: 35-39.
29. Measey, G.J., Mejissa, J. and Müller, H. 2006. Notes on the distribution and abundance of the caecilian Boulengerula uluguruensis (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol., 44: 6-13.
30. Meiri, S. and Dayan, T. 2003. On the validity of Bergmann's rule. J. Biogeogr., 30: 331-351.
31. Monnet, J.M. and Cherry, M.I. 2002. Sexual size dimorphism in anurans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 2301-2307.
32. Morrison, C. and Hero, J.M. 2003. Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: a review. J. Anim. Ecol., 72: 270-279.
33. Navas, C.A., Antoniazzi, M.M., Carvalho, J.E., Chaui-Berlink, J.G., James, R.S., Jared, C. et al. 2004. Morphological and physiological specialization for digging in amphisbaenians, an ancient lineage of fossorial vertebrates. J. Exp. Biol., 207: 2433-2441.
34. Nussbaum, R.A. and Pfrender, M.E. 1998. Revision of the African caecilian genus Schistometopum Parker (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae). Miscell. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., I-IV: 1-32.
35. Rosso, A., Castellano, S. and Giacoma, C. 2005. Ecogeographic analysis of morphological and life-history variation in the Italian treefrog. Evol. Ecol., 18: 303-321.
36. Schäuble, C.S. 2004. Variation in body size and sexual dimorphism across geographical and environmental space in the frogs Limnodynastes tasmaniensis and L. peronii. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 82: 39-56.
37. Skelly, D.K. 2004. Microgeographic countergradient variation in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution, 58: 160-165.
38. Smith, M.A. and Green, D.M. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography, 28: 110-128.
39. Ståhlberg, F., Olsson, M. and Uller, T. 2001. Population divergence of developmental thermal optima in Swedish common frogs, Rana temporaria. J. Evol. Biol., 14: 755.
40. Teodecki, E.E., Brodie, E.D., Formanowicz, D.R. and Nussbaum, R.A. 1998. Head dimorphism and burrowing speed in the African caecilian Schistometopum thomense (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Herpetologica, 54: 154-160.
41. Wojciechowski, T. and Gascoigne, A. 2004. GIS Model of São Tomé derived from Ministério do Ultramar, Junta de Investigações do Ultramar 1958. Carta de São Tomé. Gulf of Guinea Conservation Group/Gulf of Guinea Islands' Biodiversity Network (available at: www.ggcg.st).