Enantioselective hydrogenation of β-ketoesters using a MeO-PEG-supported Biphep ligand under atmospheric pressure: A practical synthesis of (S)-fluoxetine

Synlett

Volumn , Issue 15, 2006, Pages 2395-2398

  Chai, Liting ^a   Chen, Huansheng ^a   Li, Zhiming ^a   Wang, Quanrui ^a   Tao, Fenggang ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Asymmetric synthesis; Biphenyl ligands; Fluoxetine; Hydrogenation; Supported catalysis

Indexed keywords

6,6' BIS(DIPHENYLPHOSPHANYL)BIPHENYL; BENZENE DERIVATIVE; BETA KETOESTER DERIVATIVE; BIPHENYL DERIVATIVE; ESTER DERIVATIVE; ETHYL 3 HYDROXY 3 PHENYLPROPANOATE; FLUOXETINE; OXALIC ACID; RUTHENIUM COMPLEX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CATALYSIS; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRUG SYNTHESIS; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; HYDROGENATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 33749335267     PISSN: 09365214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-949650     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. (a) Kitamura, M.; Tokunaga, M.; Ohkuma, T.; Noyori, R. Org. Synth. 1993, 71, 1.
2. (b) Mikami, K.; Yusa, Y.; Korenaga, T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1643.
3. (c) Noyori, R.; Ohkuma, T.; Kitamura, M.; Takaya, H.; Sayo, N.; Kumobayashi, H.; Akutagawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5856.
4. Robertson, D. W.; Krushinski, J. H.; Fuller, R. W.; Leander, J. D. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1412.
5. (a) Chénevert, R.; Fortier, G. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1603.
6. (b) Chénevert, R.; Fortier, G.; Rhlid, R. B. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 6769.
7. (a) Sakuraba, S.; Achiwa, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 748.
8. (b) Lily Co. Drugs Future 1996, 21, 83.
9. Representative synthesis of optically active fluoxetine: (a) Srebnik, M.; Ramachandran, P. V.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2916.
10. (b) Corey, E. J.; Reichard, G. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5207.
11. (c) Sakuraba, S.; Achiwa, K. Synlett 1991, 689.
12. (d) Kumar, A.; Ner, D. H.; Dike, S. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1901.
13. (e) Devocelle, M.; Agbossou, F.; Mortreux, A. Synlett 1997, 1306.
14. (f) Wang, G.-Y.; Liu, X.-S.; Zhao, G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1873.
15. Huang, H.-L.; Liu, L.-T.; Chen, S.-F.; Ku, H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1637.
16. Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Girard, C.; Touati, R.; Tranchier, J. P.; Ben Hassine, B.; Genêt, J. P. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 261.
17. Genêt, J. P.; Pinel, C.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Mallart, S.; Pfister, X.; Caño De Andrade, M. C.; Laffitte, J. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 665.
18. For excellent reviews, see (a) Benaglia, M.; Puglisi, A.; Cozzi, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3401.
19. (b) Ley, S. V.; Baxendale, I. R.; Bream, R. N.; Jackson, P. S.; Leach, A. G.; Longbottom, D. A.; Nesi, M.; Scott, J. S.; Storer, R. I.; Taylor, S. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 3815.
20. (a) Toy, P. H.; Tanda, K. D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 546.
21. (b) Wentworth, P. Jr.; Janda, K. D. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1917.
22. (c) Pu, L. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2227.
23. (d) Bergbreiter, D. E. Catal. Today 1998, 42, 389.
24. (e) Deng, G.-J.; Li, G.-R.; Zhu, L.-Y.; Zhou, H.-F.; He, Y.-M.; Fan, Q.-H.; Shuai, Z.-G. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 244, 118.
25. th International Symposium on Fine Chemistry and Functional Polymers held at Shanghai during October 2005.
26. Schmid, R.; Foricher, J.; Cereghetti, M.; Schonhoizer, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1991, 74, 370.
27. Zhang, Z.-G.; Qian, H.; Longmire, J.; Zhang, X. M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6223.
28. 3): δ = -14.05 (s).
29. Catalyst Preparation: To a mixture of diphosphine ligand 3 (60 mg, 0.0126 mmol) and bis(2-methylallyl)cycloocta-1,5-diene ruthenium (II) complex (4 mg, 0.0126 mmol) in anhydrous degassed acetone (1.5 mL) was added 0.18 M methanolic HBr (0.14 mL, 0.025 mmol). The amber mixture was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h and the solvent removed thoroughly in vacuo to leave the active catalyst, which was used immediately as a hydrogenation catalyst.
30. Fan, Q.-H.; Deng, G.-J.; Lin, C.-C.; Chan, A. S. C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 1241.
31. 2O (30 mL). The precipitated polymeric catalyst was collected by filtration for reuse in the next run. Both the yield and the ee value of the alcohol were determined from the filtrate.