Understanding tree fruit quality based on consumer acceptance

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 712 I, Issue , 2006, Pages 183-189

  Crisosto, C H ^a   Crisosto, G ^a   Neri, F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

"In store" consumer acceptance tests; Flavor segregation; Industry surveys; Nectarines; Peaches; Plums; Preconditioning treatment; Ripe titratable acidity; Sensory evaluation techniques; Soluble solids concentration; Trained panel

Indexed keywords

PRUNUS DOMESTICA; PRUNUS PERSICA; PRUNUS PERSICA NUCIPERSICA;

EID: 33749248155     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2006.712.18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bruhn, C.M., Feldman, N., Garlitz, C., Harwood, J., Ivans, E., Marshall, M., Riley, A., Thurber, D., Williamson, M. 1991. Consumer perceptions of quality: apricots, cantaloupes, peaches, pears, strawberries, and tomatoes. J. Food Qual. 14: 187-195.
2. Byrne, D. 2003. Breeding peach and nectarines for mild-winter climate areas: State of the art and future directions. In: Marra, F., Sottile, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Peach Symposium. Agrigento, Italy 10 September, pp. 102-109.
3. Crisosto, C.H. 1997. Stone fruit ripening protocol for receivers. 97/101, slide set with cassette tape. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
4. Crisosto, C.H., Johnson, R.S., DeJong, T., Day, K.R. 1997. Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality. HortScience 32(5): 820-823.
5. Crisosto, C.H., Mitchell, F.G., Ju, Z. 1999. Susceptibility to chilling injury of peach, nectarine, and plum cultivars grown in California. HortScience 34(6): 1116-1118.
6. Crisosto, C.H., 2000. Optimum procedures for ripening stone fruit. Management of Fruit Ripening. Postharvest Horticulture Series. No. 9, April.
7. Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G.M. 2001. Understanding consumer acceptance of early harvested 'Hayward' kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 22: 205-213.
8. Crisosto, C.H. 2002a. How do we increase peach consumption? Acta Hort. 592: 601-605.
9. Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G.M. 2002b. Understanding American and Chinese consumer acceptance of 'Redglobe' table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24: 155-162.
10. Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G., Bowerman, E. 2003a. Searching for consumer satisfaction: New trends in the California peach industry. In: Marra, F., Sottile, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Peach Symposium. Agrigento, Italy, 10 September, pp. 113-118.
11. Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G.M., Metheney, P. 2003b. Consumer acceptance of 'Brooks' and 'Bing' cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28: 159-167.
12. Crisosto, C.H., Garner, D., Andris, H.L., Day, K.R. 2004a. Controlled delayed cooling extends peach market life. HortTechnology 14: 99-104.
13. Crisosto, C.H., Garner, D., Crisosto, G.M., Bowerman, E. 2004b. Increasing 'Blackamber' plum (Prunus salicina Lindell) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34: 237-244.
14. Crisosto, C.H. and G.M. Crisosto. 2005. Relationship between ripe soluble solids concentration (RSSC) and consumer acceptance of high and low acid melting flesh peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch cultivars. Postharvest Biology and Technology 38(3): 239-246.
15. Crisosto, C.H. and G.M. Crisosto. 2006. Segregation of peach and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch cultivars according to their organoleptic characteristics. Postharvest Biology and Technology 39(1): 10-18.
16. Hilaire, C., 2003. The peach industry in France: State of art, research and development. In: Marra, F., Sottile, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Mediterranean Peach Symposium. Agrigento, Italy, 10 September, pp. 27-34.
17. Hilaire, C., Mathieu, V. 2004. Le Point sur la qualite gustative des peches et nectarines. Infos-Ctifl. 201: 27-31.
18. Liverani, A., Giovannini, D., Brandi, F. 2002. Increasing fruit quality of peaches and nectarines: the main goals of ISF-FO (Italy). Acta Hort. 592: 507-514.
19. Neri, F., Vassalli, P., Brigati, S. 1996. Valutazione organolettica di alcune cultivar di pesche e nettarine. Rivista di Frutticoltura 7/8: 57-63.
20. Ravaglia, G., Sansavini, S., Ventura, M., Tabanelli, D. 1996. Indici di maturazione e miglioramneto qualitative delle pesche. Frutticoltura. 3: 61-66.
21. Testoni, A. 1995. Momento di raccolta, qualità, condizionamento e confezionamento delle pesche. Proc. Symposium "La peschicoltura Veronese alle soglie del 2000." Verona, 25 February, p. 327-355.
22. Ventura, M., Sama, A., Minguzzi, A., Lazoni, S., Sansavini, S. 2000. Ottimizzazione del carico di frutti per migliorare la produzione e la qualità delle nettarine 'Supercrimson' e 'Venus'. In: Sansavini, S. (Ed.), Per una nuova peschicoltura: produzione, organizzazione, mercato. XXIV Convengo Peschicolo, Cesena 24-25 Febbraio, p. 173-176.