Simulation of fuzzy multiattribute models for grey relationships

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 111-120

  Olson, David L ^a   Wu, Desheng ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fuzzy sets; Grey analysis; Monte Carlo simulation; Multiple attribute decision making (MADM)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

GREY ANALYSIS; MULTIATTRIBUTE MODELS; MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING (MADM); OUTRANKING MULTIATTRIBUTE METHODS;

FUZZY SETS;

EID: 33749176597     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aouam T., Chang S.I., and Lee E.S. Fuzzy MADM: An outranking method. European Journal of Operational Research 145 2 (2003) 317-328
2. Brans J.P., and Vincke Ph. A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method. Management Science 31 (1985) 647-656
3. Chang Y.-H., and Yeh C.-H. A new airline safety index. Transportation Research Part B 38 (2004) 369-383
4. Deng J.L. Control problems of grey systems. Systems and Controls Letters 5 (1982) 288-294
5. Dubois D., and Prade H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications (1980), Academic Press, Inc., New York
6. El-Hawary M.E. Electric Power Applications of Fuzzy Systems (1998), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Press, Inc.
7. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., and Ruan D. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 87 (2004) 171-184
8. Keeney R.L., and Raiffa H. Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976), Wiley, New York
9. Larichev O.I., and Moshkovich H.M. ZAPROS: A Method and System for Ordering Multiattribute Alternatives on the Base of a Decision-maker's Preferences (1991), All-Union Research Institute for System Studies, Moscow
10. Levary R.R., and Wan K. A simulation approach for handling uncertainty in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 106 (1998) 116-122
11. Liu S., Guo B., and Dang Y. Grey System Theory and Applications (1999), Scientific Press, Beijing
12. Roy B. ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classement fonde sur une representation floue des preferences en presence de criteres multiple. Cahiers du Centre Etudes Recherche Operationelle 20 (1978) 3-24
13. Royes G.F., Bastos R.C., and Royes G.F. Applicants' selection applying a fuzzy multicriteria CBR methodology. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 14 4 (2003) 167-180
14. Saaty T.L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990) 426-447
15. Wang R.-T., Ho C.-T., Feng C.-M., and Yang Y.-K. A comparative analysis of the operational performance of Taiwan's major airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 10 (2004) 353-360
16. Zaras K. Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research 159 (2004) 196-206