Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant?

Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant?

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-128

  Cornish, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biotechnological revolution; Digital revolution; Economic policy; Global trade; Intellectual property policy; Intellectual property rights; Internet

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749167012     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263073.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (65)

1. Sir Neil MacCormick, 'On the Very Idea of Intellectual Property; an Essay according to the Institution-alist Theory of Law' (2002)1) IPQ 1.
2. Jane Gaines, Contested Cultures: the Image, the Voice and the Law (London; BFI Publishing, 1992).
3. Naomi Klein, No Logo: No Space, No Choice, No Jobs. Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies (London: Flamingo, 2000).
4. Further, Cornish et al., 'Procedures and Remedies for Enforcing IPRs: the European Commission's Proposed Directive', Opinion [2003] EIPR 447.
5. G. Schricker, 'Deregulierung im Recht des unlauteren Wettbewerbs?' [1994] GRUR Int 586
6. A. G. Papandreou, 'The Economic Effect of Trademarks' (1956) 44 Cal. LR 503.
7. W. R. Cornish and J. Phillips, 'The Economic Function of Trade Marks: an Analysis with Special Reference to Developing Countries' (1982) 13 IIC 41.
8. W. Landes and R. Posner, 'Trade Mark Law: an Economic Perspective' (1987) 30 J. L. & Econs. 265.
9. N. Economides, The Economics of Trademarks' (1988) 78 TMR 523.
10. S. L. Carter, 'The Trouble with Trademark' (1990) 99 Yale LJ 759.
11. G. Schricker, 'Loss of Trade Mark Rights by Non-use: a Study of German and Comparative Law' (1971) 2 IIC 173.
12. J. Davis, 'Europeart Trade Mark Law and the Enclosure of the Commons' [2002] IPQ 342.
13. A. Bender and P. von Kapff, 'Born to be Free-The Community Trade Mark in Practice' (2001) 32 IIC 625.
14. R. Annand, and H. Norman, The Trade Marks Act 1994, (2nd edn. (London: Blackstone, 1998).
15. F. Schechter, 'The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection', (1927) 40 Harvard LR 813.
16. O. Morgan, 'Homer Simpson Strikes Again' [2002] Ent. LR 109.
17. B. Sherman and L, Botfly, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge: CUP, 1999), 163-6.
18. C. Fellner, Protection of Industrial Designs in the EEC (Oxford: ESC Publishing, 1985).
19. R. Gittings, The Young Thomas Hardy (London: Heinemann, 1975), 158.
20. S. Breyer, 'The Uneasy Case of Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photographs, and Computer Programs' (1970) 84 Harvard LR 281.
21. Sir A. Plant, The New Commerce in Ideas and Intellectual Property (London: Athlone Press, 1953).
22. W. Landes and R. Posner, 'Indefinitely Renewable Copyright' (2003) 70 U. Chicago LR 471.
23. Sir H. Laddie, 'Copyright: Over-strength, Over-regulated, Over-rated' [1996] EIPR 253.
24. R. Tompson, 'Scottish Judges and the Birth of British Copyright' [1992] Jurid, R. 18.
25. H. B. Abrams, 'The Historic Foundation of American Copyright Law: Exploding the Myth of Common Law Copyright' (1983) 29.
26. Matters R. Deazley, 'Re-reading Donaldson (1774) in the 21st Century and Why it Matters' [2003] EIPR 270.
27. Reinbothe and S. von Lewinski, The WIPO Treaties 1996 (London: Butterworths, 2002).
28. M. Ficsor, The Law of Copyright and the Internet (Oxford: OUP, 2002).
29. J. Bing, 'The New or Evolving "Access Right"', Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright (New York ALAI, 2001), 288.
30. B. Hugenholtz, 'Why the Copyright Directive is Unimportant and Possibly Invalid' [2000] EIPR 499.
31. M. Hart, 'Copyright in the Information Society' [2002] EIPR 58.
32. H. Wiese, The Justification of the Copyright System in the Digital Age' [2002] EIPR 387.
33. M. Freegard and J. Black, The Decisions of the UK Performing Right and Copyright Tribunals (London: Butterworths, 1997).
34. S. Ricketson, The Berne Convmiimt for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, 1886-1986 (London: Kluwer, 1987), 114-25.
35. D. Gervais, The TRIPS Agreement, 2nd edn. (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003).
36. C. M. Correa and A. A. Yusuf (eds.), Intellectual Property and International Trade: the TRIPS Agreement (London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998).
37. J. H. Reichman, 'Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement Introduction to a Scholarly Debate' (1996) 29 Vanderbilt JTL 345.
38. P. Drahos and R. Mayne (eds.), Global Intellectual Property Rights (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2002).
39. K. Beresford, Patenting Software under the European Patent Convention (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).
40. S. Ricketson, 'Business Method Patents: A Matter of Convenience?' [2003] IPQ 97.
41. W. Cornish and D. Llewelyn, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights, 5th edn (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003), paras. 568-75.
42. E. W. Kitch, 'The Nature and Function of the Patent System' (1977) 20 J. L. & Econs. 265.
43. R. P. Merges and R. R. Nelson, 'On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope' (1990) 90 Col. LR 839.
44. P. A. David and T. E. Olsen, 'Technology Adoption, Learning Spillovers and the Optimal Duration of Patent-based Monopolies' (1992) 10 Int. J. Ind. Org. 517.
45. M. Heller and E. S. Eisenberg, 'Patents Deter Innovation; the Anti-Commons in Biomedical Research' (1998) 280 Science 698.
46. U. Scbatz, OECD Expert Workshop on Genetic Inventions, IPRs and Licensing Practices, Berlin, 24-25 January 2002 pp. 7-12.
47. J. Straus and M. Lindenmaier, reported to the OECD Expert Workshop on Genetic Inventions, IPRs and Licensing Practices (Berlin, 24-25 January 2002).
48. J. Verbraggen and A. Lõrincz, 'Patents and Technical Standards' (2002) 33 IIC 125.
49. M. Lemley, 'Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-setting Organisations' (2002) 90 Cal. LR 1889.
50. J. M. Mueller, 'Patent Misuse through the Capture of Industry Standards' (2002) 17 Berk. Tech. LJ 623.
51. C. T. Taylor and Z. A. Silberston, The Economic Impact of the Patent System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).
52. F. M. Scherer, The Economic Effects of Compulsory Patent Licensing (New York University, 1977).
53. D. Gilat, Experimental Use and. Patents (Weinheim; VCH, 1995).
54. W. R. Cornish, 'Experimental Use of Patented Inventions in European Community States' (1998) 29 IIC 735-53.
55. M. Rimmer, 'Myriad Gaieties: Patent Law and Genetic Testing' [2003] EIPR 20.
56. J. Sulston and G. Ferry, The Common Thread (London: Bantam Press, 2001).
57. A. K. Hass, 'The Wellcome Trust's Disclosure of Gene Sequence Data into the Public Domain and the Potential for Proprietary Rights in the Human Genome' (2001) Berk. Tech. LJ 145.
58. P. Marsico, 'The Chemical-Pharmaceutical Product Patent: Absolute Protection, General Formulas and Sufficiency of Description' [1990] EIPE 397.
59. A. W. White, 'Gene and Compound per seClaims' [2000/2001] BioSc. LR 239.
60. R. S. Crespi, 'Gene and Compound Claims: Another View' [2001]BioSc. LR 3.
61. S. Dastgheib-Vinarov, 'A Higher Nonobviousness Standard for Gene Patents: Protecting Biomedical Research from the Big Chill' (2000) 4 Marq IPLR 143.
62. B. Sherman and L. Bently, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property law (Cambridge: Cup, 1999), 163-6.
63. C. Fellner, Protection of Industrial Designs in the EEC (Oxford; ESC Publishing, 1985)).
64. H. Laddie et al., Modern Law of Copyright, 3rd edn. (London; Butterworths, 2000).
65. M. Rimmer, 'Beyond Blue Gene: Intellectual Property and Bioinformafies' (2003) 34 IIC 31.