Total knee arthroplasty with modular rotating-platform hinge

Orthopedics

Volumn 29, Issue 9 SUPLL., 2006, Pages

  Jones, Richard E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; JOINT STABILITY; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; OSTEOLYSIS; POLIOMYELITIS; POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 33749128944     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Walldius B. Arthroplasty of the knee using an endoprosthesis. 8 years' experience. Acta Orthop Scand. 1960; 30:137-148.
2. Feng EL, Stulberg SD, Wixson RL. Progressive subluxation and polyethylene wear in total knee replacements with flat articular surfaces. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;299:60-71.
3. Friedman RJ, Hirst P, Ross R, et al Results of revision total knee arthroplasty performed for aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;255:235-241.
4. Jones RE, Skedros JG, Chan AJ, Beauchamp DH, Harkins PC. Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-hearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16:279-287.
5. Jones RE, Barrack RL, Skedros J. Modular, mobile-bearing hinge total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392:306-314.
6. Barrack RL, Lyons TR, Ingraham RQ, Johnson JC. The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:858-866.
7. Barrack RL. Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 392:292-299.
8. Westrich GH, Mollano AV, Sculco TP, Buly RL, Laskin RS, Windsor R. Rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in severely affected knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 379:195-208.
9. McEwen HM, Fisher J, Goldsmith AA, et al. Wear of fixed beating and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001; 12:1049-1052.
10. McEwen HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ, et al. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech. 2005; 38:375-365.
11. Bell CJ, McEwen HM, Barnett PI, et al. Comparison of wear in fixed and mobile bearing knee designs. Trans Orthop Res Soc. 2003:1403.
12. Fisher J, McEwen HM, Bell CJ, et al. Wear of polyethylene in artificial knee joints. Curr Orthop. 2001; 15:399-405.
13. Engh GA. Bone defect classification. In: Engh GA, Rorabeck CH, eds. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997:63-120.
14. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 248:9-12.
15. Hogan KA, Bhatti H, Schutte HD. Cementless revision knee replacement: The MUSC experience. Medical University of South Carolina Orthopaedic Journal. 2004; VII:20-21.
16. Jones RE. Mobile bearings in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2005; 54:225-231.
17. Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH. Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 416:217-224.