Flow intrusion characteristics and fracture properties of titanium-fibre-reinforced bone cement

Biomaterials

Volumn 19, Issue 17, 1998, Pages 1569-1577

  Topoleski, L D Timmie ^a   Ducheyne, Paul ^b   Cuckler, John M ^c,d  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d Kentucky   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Fatigue; Flow; Fracture

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CRACK INITIATION; FATIGUE TESTING; FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES;

FLOW INTRUSION; REINFORCED BONE CEMENT;

BONE CEMENT;

ALIZARIN RED S; BONE CEMENT; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CENTRIFUGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FATIGUE; FEMUR; FLOW KINETICS; FRACTURE; MACHINE; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STAINING; STRESS FRACTURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; BONE CEMENTS; DOGS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; TITANIUM;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 0032171119     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00117-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. [1] James SP, Hasty M, Davies J, Piehler H, Harris WH. A fractographic investigation of PMMA bone cement focussing on the relationship between porosity reduction and increased fatigue life. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:651-62.
2. [2] Rose RM, Litsky AS. Biomechanical considerations in the loosening of flip replacement prostheses. Current perspectives on implantable devices, vol. 1. New York: JAI Press Inc., 1989;1-45.
3. [3] Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. A fractographic analysis of in vivo poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement failure mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;24:135-54.
4. [4] Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. The effects of centrifugation and titanium fibre reinforcement on fatigue failure mechnanisms in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res, 1995;29:299-307.
5. [5] Sih GC, Berman AT. Fracture toughness concepts applied to methyl methacrylate. J Biomed Mater Res 1980;14:311-24.
6. [6] Weightman B, Freeman MAR, Revell PA, Braden M, Albrektsson BEJ, Carlson IV. The mechanical properties of cement and loosening of the femoral component of Hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg, 1987;69-B:558-64.
7. [7] Litsky AS, Rose RM, Rubin CT, Thrasher EL. A reduced-modulus acrylic bone cement preliminary results. J Ortho Res 1990;8:623-6.
8. [8] Chow LC, Takagi S, Ishikawa K. Formation of hydroxyapatite in cement system. In: Brown PW, editor. Hydroxyapatite and related materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994;127-137.
9. [9] Burke DW, Gates EJ, Harris WH. Centrifugation as a method of improving tensile and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984;66-A(8):1265-73.
10. [10] Davies JP, O'Connor DO, Greer JA, Harris WH. Comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex P, Zimmer Regular and LVC bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;21:719-30.
11. [11] Davies JP, O'Connor DO, Burke DW, Jasty M, Harris WH. The effect of centrifugation on the fatigue life of bone cement in the presence of surface irregularities. Clin Orth Rel Res 1988;229:156-61.
12. [12] Hamati FI, Wixson RL, Novak MA, Lautenschlager EP. The effect of notching of simplex-P bone cement on the fatigue lives of regular vs vacuum-mixed specimens. Transactions of the 33rd Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. San Francisco, California, 1987;226.
13. [13] Askew MJ, Kufe MF, Fleissner PR, Gradisar SJS, Tan JS. Effects of vacuum mixing on mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:573-80.
14. [14] Gilbert JL, Menis DW, Smith SM, Lautenschlager EP, Wixson RW. Effect of pore size and morphology of fatigue crack initiation in acrylic bone cements. Trans 16th Annual Meeting Society of Biomaterials, Society for Biomaterials, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 1990;103.
15. [15] Beaumont PWR. The strength of acrylic bone cements and acrylic cement-stainless steel interfaces. Part I. The strength of acrylic bone cement containing second phase dispersions. J Mater Sci 1977;12:1845-52.
16. [16] Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Wellendorf H. Carbon graphite fiber reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate). Properties under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1065-80.
17. [17] Fishbane BM, Pond RB. Stainless steel fibre reinforcement of polymethylmethacrylate. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1977;128:194-9.
18. [18] Knoell A, Maxwell H, Bechtol C. Graphite fiber reinforced bone cement - an experimental feasibility investigation. Ann Biomed Engng 1975;3:225-9.
19. [19] Pilliar RM, Blackwell R, McNab I, Cameron HU. Carbon fiber-reinforced bone cement in orthopaedic surgery. J Biomed Mater Res 1976;10:893-906.
20. [20] Pilliar RM, Bratina W, Blackwell RA. Mechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate for surgical implant applications. In: Reifsnider KL, Lauraitis KN (editors). Fatigue of filamentary composite materials, ASTM STP 636, Philadelphia, PA, USA, ASTM, 1977;206-27.
21. [21] Pourdeyhimi B, Robinson HH IV, Schwartz PL, Wagner HD. Fracture toughness of Kevla 29/poly (methylmethacrylate) composite materials for surgical implantations. Ann Biomed Engng 1986;14:277-94.
22. [22] Saha S, Pal S. Mechanical characterization of commercially made carbon-fiber-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:817-26.
23. [23] Saha SI, Pal S. Improvement of mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement by Fiber reinforcement. J Biomech, 1984;17:467-78.
24. [24] Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. Fracture toughness of titanium fiber reinforced bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:1599-1617.
25. [25] Wright TM, Trent PS. Mechanical properties of aramid fibre-reinforced acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci Let 1979;14:503-505.
26. [26] Wright TM, Trent PS. The strength and fracture properties of fiber-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. IRCS Med Sci Biomed Tech Connective Tissue Skin and Bone Surg Transplantation, 1977;5:395.
27. [27] Ducheyne P, Topoleski LDT, Cuckler JM. Reinforced bone cement method of production thereof and reinforcing fiber bundles therefor. US Patent #4,963,151, Field: December, 1988. Granted: May, 1990.
28. [28] Krause WR, Grimes LW, Mathis RS. Fatigue testing of acrylic bone cements. Statistical concepts and proposed test methodology. J Biomed Mater Res, 1988;22(A2):179-90.
29. [29] Krause WR, Mathis RS, Grimes LW. Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement. S-N, P-N, and P-S-N data. J Biomed Mater Res Appl Biomater, 1988;22(A3):221-44.
30. [30] Robinson RP, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;15:203-8.
31. [31] Wang CT, Pilliar RM. Fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci 1989;24:3725-38.
32. [32] Rimnac CM, Wright TM, McGill DL. The effect of centrifugation on the fracture properties of acrylic bone cements. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68-A(2):281-7.
33. [33] Topoleski LDT, Ducheyne PI, Cuckler JM. Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. Biomaterials 1993;14(15):1165-72.
34. [34] Topoleski LDT, Rutledge P, Lu X. Backscattered electron imaging to enhance the microstructural contrast in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement fracture analysis. Cell Mater. 1995;5(3): 283-92.
35. 4 on the fatigue crack propagation rate of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement. J Biomed Mater. Res. 1996;31(1):131-137.