The systematic significance of seed morphology in Stenocereus (Cactaceae)

Taxon

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 983-992

  Arroyo Cosultchi, Gabriel ^a   Terrazas, Teresa ^a,b   Arias, Salvador ^b   Arreola Nava, Hilda J ^a  

^a Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Cactaceae; Keel; North America; Phenetics; Scanning electron microscopy (SEM); Seed microrelief; Testa

Indexed keywords

CACTUS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEED SIZE;

NORTH AMERICA;

CACTACEAE; PACHYCEREUS; STENOCEREUS; STENOCEREUS ARAGONII; STENOCEREUS EICHLAMII;

EID: 33749025777     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/25065693     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, E. F. 2001. The Cactus Family. Timber Press, Portland.
2. Arias, S. & Terrazas, T. 2004. Seed morphology and variation in the genus Pachycereus (Cactaceae). J. Plant. Res. 117: 277-289.
3. Arias, S., Terrazas, T. & Cameron, K. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of Pachycereus (Cactaceae, Pachycereeae) based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 28: 547-557.
4. Arreola-Nava, H. J. & Terrazas, T. 2003. Especies de Stenocereus con aréolas morenas: clave y descripciones. Acta Bot. Mex. 64: 1-18.
5. Arreola-Nava, H. J. & Terrazas, T. 2004. Stenocereus zopilotensis Arreola-Nava and Terrazas (Cactaceae), a new species from México. Brittonia 56: 96-100.
6. Barthlott, W. & Hunt, D. R. 1993. Cactaceae. P. 161-197 in: Kubitzki, K. (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
7. Barthlott, W. & Hunt, D. R. 2000. Seed diversity in the Cactaceae subfamily Cactoideae. Succ. Pl. Res. 5: 1-173.
8. Barthlott, W. & Voit, G. 1979. Mikromorphologie der Samenschalen und Taxonomie der Cactaceae: Ein raster-elektronenmikroskopischer Überblick. Pl. Syst. Evol. 132: 205-229.
9. Bravo-Hollis, H. 1978. Las Cactáceas de México, ed. 2, vol. 1. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.
10. Cota, H. & Wallace, R. 1997. Chloroplast DNA evidence for divergence in Ferocactus and its relationships to North American columnar cacti (Cactaceae: Cactoideae). Syst. Bot. 22: 529-542.
11. Crisci, J. V. & López Armengol, M. F. 1983. Introducción a la Teoría y Práctica de la Taxonomía Numérica. Monografía 26. OEA, Washington, D.C.
12. Gibson, A. C. 1988a. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 1. Composition and definition of the subtribe. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 60: 11-16.
13. Gibson, A. C. 1988b. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 5. Cina and its relatives. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 60: 283-288.
14. Gibson, A. C. 1989a. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 6. Stenocereus stellatus and Stenocereus treleasei. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 61: 26-32.
15. Gibson, A. C. 1989b. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 7. The Machaerocerei members of Stenocereus. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 61: 104-112.
16. Gibson, A. C. 1990a. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 8. Organ pipe cactus and its closest relatives. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 62: 13-24.
17. Gibson, A. C. 1990b. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 9. Stenocereus queretaroensis and its closest relatives. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 62: 170-176.
18. Gibson, A. C. 1991a. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 10. The species group of Stenocereus griseus. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 63: 92-99.
19. Gibson, A. C. 1991b. The systematics and evolution of subtribe Stenocereinae. 11. Stenocereus dumortieri versus Isolatocereus dumortieri. Cact. Succ. J. (Los Angeles) 63: 184-190.
20. Gibson, A. C. & Horak, K. E. 1978. Systematic anatomy and phylogeny of the Mexican columnar cacti. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 65: 999-1057.
21. Gibson, A. C. & Nobel, P. S. 1986. The Cactus Primer. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
22. Heath, P. V. 1992. The restoration of Rathbunia Britton Rose. Calyx 2: 102-115.
23. Hunt, D. R. 1999. CITES Cactaceae Checklist. 2nd ed. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and International Organization for Succulent Plant Study. Remous Limited, Milborne Port.
24. Media Cybernetics. 1997. Image-Pro Plus Reference Guide for Windows. Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring.
25. Rohlf, F. J. 1997. NTSYS. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 2.0. Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York.
26. SAS Institute. 1998. SAS User's Guide. Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.
27. Sneath, P. H. A. & Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practices of Numerical Classification. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
28. St.-Laurent, L., Baum, B. R., Akpagana, K. & Arnason, J. T. 2000. A numerical taxonomic study of Trema (Ulmaceae) from Togo, West Africa. Syst. Bot. 25: 399-413.
29. Terrazas, T. & Loza-Cornejo, S. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Pachycereeae: a cladistic analysis based on anatomical-morphological data. Pp. 66-86 in: Fleming, T. H. & Valiente-Banuet, A. (eds.), Evolution, Ecology and Conservation of the Columnar Cacti and their Mutualists. Arizona Univ. Press, Tucson.
30. Terrazas, T., Loza-Cornejo, S. & Arreola-Nava, H. J. 2005. Anatomía caulinar de las especies del género Stenocereus (Cactaceae). Acta Bot.Venez. 28: 321-336.