Extrapolation of the opponent’s past behaviors

Adversarial Reasoning: Computational Approaches to Reading the Opponent's Mind

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 49-75

  Brueckner, Sven A ^a   van Dyke Parunak, H ^a  

^a NewVectors LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749010422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420011012     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Parunak, H.V.D. and Brueckner, S., Technical Report, Ann Arbor, MI: Altarum Institute, 2005.
2. Parunak, H.V.D., Brueckner, S., Matthews, R., Sauter, J., and Brophy, S., Technical Report, Ann Arbor, MI: Altarum Institute, 2005.
3. Rao, A.S. and Georgeff, M.P., Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture, in Allen, J., Fikes, R., and Sandwall, E., Eds., Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-91), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1991, 473-484.
4. Haddadi, A. and Sundermeyer, K., Belief-desire-intention agent architectures, in O’Hare, G.M.P. and Jennings, N.R., Found. Distr. Artif. Intell., New York: John Wiley, 1996, 169-185.
5. Carberry, S., Techniques for plan recognition, User Mod. User-Adapt. Interac., 11(1-2), 2001, 31-48.
6. Ferber, J. and Müller, J.-P., Influences and reactions: a model of situated multiagent systems, Second Intl. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-96), Kyoto, Japan, 1996, 72-79.
7. Michel, F., Formalisme, méthodologie et outils pour la modélisation et la simulation de systèmes multi-agents, Doctorat Thesis, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, 2004.
8. Kantz, H. and Schreiber, T., Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
9. Rosenschein, J.S. and Zlotkin, G., Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
10. Vane, R. and Lehner, P., Using hypergames to increase planned payoff and reduce risk, Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 5(3), Sept. 2002, 365-380.
11. Stirling, W.C., Satisficing Games and Decision Making, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
12. Parunak, H.V.D., Brueckner, S.A., and Sauter, J., Digital pheromone mechanisms for coordination of unmanned vehicles, First Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, 2002, 449-450.
13. Parunak, H.V.D., Brueckner, S., and Sauter, J., Digital pheromones for coordination of unmanned vehicles, in Weyns, D., Parunak, H.V.D., and Michel, F., Eds., Workshop on Environments for Multi-Agent Systems (E4MAS 2004), New York: Springer, 2004, 246-263.
14. Parunak, H.V.D. and Brueckner, S., Ant-like missionaries and cannibals: synthetic pheromones for distributed motion control, Fourth Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents (Agents 2000), Barcelona, Spain, 2000, 467-474.
15. Brueckner, S., Return from the ant: synthetic ecosystems for manufacturing control, Dr.rer.nat. thesis, Humboldt University, Berlin, 2000.
16. Sauter, J.A., Matthews, R., Parunak, H.V.D., and Brueckner, S., Evolving adaptive pheromone path planning mechanisms, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS02), Bologna, Italy, 2002, 434-440.
17. Parunak, H.V.D., A survey of environments and mechanisms for humanhuman stigmergy, in Weyns, D., Michel, F., and Parunak, H.V.D., Eds., Proc. of E4MAS 2005, Utrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2006.
18. Parunak, H.V.D., Brueckner, S., Fleischer, M., and Odell, J., A design taxonomy of multi-agent interactions, in Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 4, Melbourne, Australia: Springer, 2003, 123-137.
19. Ilachinski, A., Artificial War: Multiagent-based Simulation of Combat, Singapore: World Scientific, 2004.
20. Lauren, M.K. and Stephen, R.T., Map-aware non-uniform automata (MANA) — a New Zealand approach to scenario modelling, J. Battlefield Tech., 5(1), March, 2002, 27ff.
21. Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., and Collins, A., The Cognitive Structure of Emotions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
22. Parunak, H.V.D., Bisson, R., Brueckner, S., Matthews, R., and Sauter, J., Representing dispositions and emotions in simulated combat, in Thompson, S., Ghanea-Hercock, R., Greaves, M., Meyer, A., and Jennings, N., Eds., Workshop on Defence Applications of Multi-Agent Systems (DAMAS05, at AAMAS05), Utrecht, Netherlands, 2005 (forthcoming).
23. Alonso, R. and Li, H., Analyzing the Adversary’s Context, Technical Report, Princeton, NJ: Sarnoff Corporation, 2005.