Spontaneous response generalization during whole word instruction: Reading to spell and spelling to read

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 121-130

  Noell, George H ^a   Connell, James E ^a   Duhon, Gary J ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Reading; Response generalization; Spelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748992043     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-006-9016-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alig-Cybriwsky, A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1990). Use of a constant time delay procedure in teaching preschoolers in a group format. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 99-116.
2. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied Behavior Analysis. Upper saddle River: Prentice Hall.
3. de Rose, J. C., de Souza, D. G., & Hanna, E. S. (1996). Teaching reading and spelling: Exclusion and stimulus equivalence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 451-469.
4. Foorman, B. (1993). Links among segmenting, spelling, and reading words in first and second grades. Reading & Writing, 5, 1-15.
5. Harper, G. F., Mallette, B., Maheady, L., Parkes, V. & Moore, J. (1993). Retention and generalization of spelling words acquired using a peer-mediated procedure by children with mild handicapping conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3, 25-38.
6. Joseph, L. M. (2000). Developing first graders' phonemic awareness, word identification and spelling: A comparison of two contemporary phonics instructional approaches. Reading Research & Instruction, 39, 160-169.
7. Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, B. P. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243-255.
8. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9. O'Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1995). Improving the generalization of sound/symbol knowledge: Teaching spelling to kindergarten children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 255-275.
10. O'Connor, R. E., & Padeliadu, S. (2000). Blending versus whole word approaches in first grade remedial reading: Short-term and delayed effects on reading and spelling words. Reading & Writing, 13, 159-182.
11. Okyere, B. A., Heron, T. E., & Goddard, Y. (1997). Effects of self-correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of the written spelling of elementary school children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 51-69.
12. Pereira, J. A., & Winton, A. S. W. (1991). Teaching and remediation of mathematics: A review of behavioral research. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 5-36.
13. Saunders, K. J., Johnston, M. D., & Brady, N. C. (2000). Identity matching of consonant-vowel-consonant words by prereaders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 309-312.
14. Sidman, M., Willson-Morris, M., & Kirk, B. (1986). Match-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis & Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1-19.
15. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. B. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.