Effect of cue-target interval on the N2pc

NeuroReport

Volumn 17, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 1655-1658

  Robitaille, Nicolas ^a,b   Jolicœur, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE ET COGNITION   (Canada)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Event related potential; Flanker effects; N2pc; Spatial selection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33748988161     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000236859.16457.34     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA. Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994; 20:1000-1014.
2. Hopf JM, Luck SJ, Girelli M, Hagner T, Mangun GR, Scheich H, et al. Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10:1233-1241.
3. Hopf JM, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld AM, Heinze HJ, Luck SJ. How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision? Evidence from magnetoencephalographic recordings. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002; 15:17-29.
4. Woodman GF, Luck SJ. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 1999; 400:867-869.
5. Woodman GF, Luck SJ. Serial deployment of attention during visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2003; 29:121-138.
6. Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 99:225-234.
7. Jolicoeur P, Sessa P, Dell'acqua R, Robitaille N. On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Res [Epub ahead of print 24 September 2005].
8. Jolicoeur P, Sessa P, Dell'acqua R, Robitaille N. Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: evidence from human electrophysiology. Eur J Cogn Psychol 2006; 18:560-578.
9. West R, Wymbs N. Is detecting prospective cues the same as selecting targets? An ERP study. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2004; 4:354-363.
10. Girelli M, Luck S. Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion? J Cogn Neurosci 1997; 9:238-253.
11. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 1980; 32:3-25.
12. Shiu L, Pashler H. Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994; 20:1037-1054.
13. Luck SJ, Girelli M, McDermott MT, Ford MA. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cogn Psychol 1997; 33:64-87.
14. Yantis S, Johnston JC. On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1990; 16:135-149.
15. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 1974; 40:225-240.
16. Eriksen CW. The flankers task and response competition: a useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Vis Cogn 1995; 2:101-118.
17. Feintuch U, Cohen A. Visual attention and coactivation of response decisions for features from different dimensions. Psychol Sci 2002; 13:361-369.
18. Schneider W. Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM - PC compatibles. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1988; 20:206-217.
19. Robitaille N, Jolicoeur P. Fundamental properties of the N2pc as an index of spatial attention: effects of masking. Can J Exp Psychol 2006; 60:79-89.
20. Ulrich R, Miller JP. Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology 2001; 38:816-827.