Adaptation of POD-based aeroelastic ROMs for varying mach number and angle of attack: Application to a complete F-16 configuration

Collection of Technical Papers - U.S. Air Force T and E Days: Transforming the T and E Enterprise

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 559-585

  Lieu, Thuan ^a,b,c   Farhat, Charbel ^a,b,c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c AIAA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGLE OF ATTACK; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; MACH NUMBER; REDUCED-ORDER MODELS (ROMS);

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; FLIGHT DYNAMICS; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; TRANSONIC FLOW; VECTORS;

ANGLE OF ATTACK INDICATORS;

EID: 33748977807     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. R. N. Yurkovich, D. D. Liu, P. C. Chen, The state-of-the-art of unsteady aerodynamics for high performance aircraft, AIAA Paper 2001-0428.
2. P. Geuzaine, G. Brown, C. Harris, C. Farhat, Aeroelastic dynamic anlysis of a full f-16 configuration for various flight conditions, AIAA Journal 41 (2003) 363-371.
3. C. Farhat, P. Geuzaine, G. Brown, Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an f-16 fighter, Computers and Fluids 32 (1) (2003) 3-29.
4. M. Sadeghi, F. Liu, Investigation of non-linear flutter by a coupled aerodynamics and structural dynamics method, AIAA Paper 2001-0573.
5. F. Liu, J. Gai, Y. Zhu, Calculation of wing flutter by a coupled fluid-structure method, Journal of Aircraft 38 (2) (2001) 334-342.
6. E. Albano, W. Rodden, A doublet-lattic method for calculating lift distribution on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flow, AIAA Journal 7 (1969) 279-285.
7. H. Ashley, G. Zartarian, Piston theory - a new aerodynamic tool for the aeroelastician, Journal of Aerospace Sciences 23 (1956) 1109-1118.
8. M. C. Romanowski, Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using karhunen-loeve eigenmodes, 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (1996) 7-13.
9. K. Willcox, J. Peraire, Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA Journal 40 (11) (2002) 2323-30.
10. B. I. Epureanu, A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery, Journal of Fluids and Structures 17 (2003) 971-982.
11. K. C. Hall, J. P. Thomas, E. H. Dowell, Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique, AIAA Paper 99-16520.
12. K. C. Hall, J. P. Thomas, E. H. Dowell, Proper orthogonal decomposition technique for transonic unsteady aerodynamic flows, AIAA Journal 38 (2) (2000) 1853-1862.
13. T. Kim, J. E. Bussoletti, An optimal reduced-order aeroelastic modeling based on a response-based modal analysis of unsteady cfd models, AIAA Paper 2001-1525.
14. J. P. Thomas, E. H. Dowell, K. C. Hall, Three-dimensional transonic aeroelasticity using proper orthogonal decomposition-based reduced order models, Journal of Aircraft 40 (3) (2003) 544-551.
15. T. Lieu, M. Lesoinne, Parameter adaptation of reduced order models for three-dimensional flutter analysis, AIAA Paper 2004-0888.
16. P. G. A. Cizmas, A. Palacios, Proper orthogonal decomposition of turbine rotor-stator interaction, Journal of Propulsion and Power 19 (2) (2003) 268-281.
17. J. E. Spitler, Initial studies of low-order turbulence modeling of the wind turbine in-flow environment, AIAA Paper 2004-1004.
18. M. Hong, K. Bhatia, G. SenGupta, K. T., G. Kuruvila, W. Silva, R. Bartels, R. Biedron, Simulations of a twin-engine transport flutter model in the transonic dynamics tunnel, International Forum On Aeroelastic and Structural Dynamics Paper IFAS D 2003-US-44.
19. K. Karhunen, Zur spektraltheorie stochastischer prozesse, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae 34.
20. M. Loeve, Functions aléatoire de second ordere, Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris 220.
21. P. S. Beran, C. L. Pettit, Prediction of nonlinear panel response using proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA Paper 2001-1292.
22. T. Lieu, C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, Reduced-order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (in press).
23. T. Lieu, Adaptation of reduced order models for applications in aeroelasticity, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder (2004).
24. W. Silva, D. E. Raveh, Development of unsteady aerodynamic state-space models from cfd-based pulse responses, AIAA Paper 2001-1213.
25. T. Lieu, C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, Pod-based aeroelastic analysis of a complete f-16 configuration: Rom adaptation and demonstration, AIAA Paper 2005-2295.
26. C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, N. Maman, Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution, International Journal For Numerical Methods in Fluids 21 (1995) 807-835.
27. M. Lesoinne, M. Sarkis, U. Hetmaniuk, C. Farhat, A linearized method for the frequency analysis of three-dimensional fluid/structure interaction problems in all flow regimes, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190 (2001) 3121-3146.
28. L. Sirovich, Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures, part 1: Coherent structures., Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 45 (3) (1987) 561-571.
29. C. Degand, C. Farhat, A three-dimensional torsional spring analogy method for unstructured dynamic meshes, Computers and Structures 80 (2002) 305-316.
30. C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, P. LeTallec, Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 157 (1998) 95-114.
31. M. Lesoinne, C. Farhat, Cfd-based aeroelastic eigensolver for the subsonic, transonic, and supersonic regimes, Journal of Aircraft 38 (4) (2001) 628-635.
32. J. L. Lumley, The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence, in: A. Yaglom, V. Tatarski (Eds.), Atmospheric Turbulence and Wave Propagations, Nauka, Moscow, 1967, pp. 166-178.
33. P. Holmes, J. L. Lumley, G. Berkooz, Turbulence, coherent structures, dynamical systems and symmetry, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
34. P. Beran, Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics, AIAA Paper 2001-0853.
35. J. Taylor, Dynamics of large scale structures in turbulent shear layers, Ph.D. thesis, Clarkson University (2001).
36. J. Taylor, M. Glauser, Towards practical flow sensing and control via pod and Ise based low-dimensional tools, in: 2002 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 2002, pp. 1-9.
37. R. Schmidt, M. Glauser, Improvements in low dimensional tools for flow-structure interaction problems: using global pod, AIAA Paper 2004-0889.
38. A. Björck, G. H. Golub, Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces, Mathematics of Computation 27 (123) (1973) 579-594.
39. L. Peterson, E. Crawley, Improved exponential time series approximation of unsteady aerodynamic operators, Journal of Aircraft 25 (1988) 121-127.