The interweaving of talk and text in a french criminal pretrial hearing

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 229-261

  Martínez, Esther González ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748948608     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_3     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality. The categorization and production of "formal interaction." The British Journal of Sociology, 33, 86-117.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
3. Cicourel, A. V. (1968). The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley.
4. Code de procédure pénale 1993-1994 [Code of criminal procedure 1993-1994] (1993). Paris: Dalloz.
5. Conein, B. (1987). Quelques formes de l'interprétation de la conversation dans la conversation [Some forms of interpretation of the conversation during the conversation]. Lexique, 5, 37-64.
6. Coulter, J. (1990). Elementary properties of argument sequences. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 181-203). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
7. Cuff, E. C, & Francis, D. W. (1978). Some features of "invited stories." About marriage breakdown. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 18, 111-133.
8. Depardon, R. (1994). Délits flagrants [Caught in the act] [Motion picture]. France: Palmeraie et désert/La Sept Cinéma
9. Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination. The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470-520). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11. Eglin, P., & Wideman, D. (1986). Inequality in professional service encounters. Verbal strategies of control versus task performance in calls to the police. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie, 15, 341-362.
12. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
14. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1986). On formal structures of practical actions. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodological studies of work (pp. 160-193). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1969)
15. Gonzalez Martínez, E. (2000). La "déclaration" dans le cadre d'une procédure pénale ou la constitution d'un "je" multiple et rassembleur [The "statement" in the context of criminal proceedings or the constitution of a multiple and unifying "I"]. Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 26, 591-614.
16. Gonzalez Martínez, E. (2001). Comment agir en confiance avec un partenaire dont on se méfie?[How can one trust a partner of whom one is suspicious?].Réseaux, 79, 87-123.
17. Gonzalez Martínez, E. (2003). L'audition de comparution immédiate. L'organisation des échanges langagiers [The organization of talk in "immediate trial" hearings]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Paris: Université de Lausanne/Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.
18. Gonzalez Martínez, E. (2005). Organisation et accountability de l'audition de comparution immédiate [Organization and accountability of the "immediate trial" hearing], Réseaux, 129-130, 209-241.
19. Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within. Alternative sequential treatments of continuers. Human Studies, 9, 205-217.
20. Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said. Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University press.
21. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1987). Children's arguing. In S. U. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 200-248). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22. Heritage, J., & Roth, A. (1995). Grammar and institution. Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 1-60.
23. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language. Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123-162). New York: Irvington.
24. Heritage, J., & Watson, D. R. (1980). Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations. Some instances analyzed. Semiotica, 30, 245-262.
25. Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation talk. Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Jacoby, S. (1998). Science as performance. Socializing scientific discourse through the conference talk rehearsal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
27. Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294-338). New York: Free Press.
28. Jefferson, G. (1978a). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies on the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219-248). New York: Academic.
29. Jefferson, G. (1978b). What's in a "Nyem"?. Sociology. 12, 135-139.
30. Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens "Yeah" and "Mm hm." Papers in Linguistics, 17, 197-216.
31. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1992). The rejection of advice. Managing the problematic convergence of a "troubles-telling" and a "service encounter." In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 521-548). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1981)
33. Jefferson, G., & Schenkein, J. (1978). Some sequential negotiations in conversation. Unexpanded and expanded versions of projected action sequences. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies on the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 155-172). New York: Academic. (Original work published 1977)
34. Komter, M. L. (1994). Accusations and defenses in courtroom interaction. Discourse and Society, 5, 165-187.
35. Komter, M. L. (1998). Dilemmas in the courtroom. A study of trials of violent crime in the Netherlands. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Komter, M. L. (2001). La construction de la preuve dans un interrogatoire de police [The construction of evidence in a police interrogation]. Droit et Société, 48, 367-393.
37. Komter, M. L. (2002). The suspect's own words. The treatment of written statements in Dutch courtrooms. Journal of Forensic Linguistics, 9, 168-192.
38. Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 365-399.
39. Levy, R. (1984). Pratiques policières et processus pénal. Le flagrant délit [Police's practices and penal process. The flagrante delicto]. Paris: Centre de recherches sociologiques sur le droit et les institutions pénales.
40. Levy, R. (1987). Du suspect au coupable. Le travail de police judiciaire [From the suspect to the guilty. The work of the judicial police]. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.
41. Linell, P., & Jönsson, L. (1991). Suspect stories. Perspective-setting in an asymmetrical situation. In I. Marková & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 75-100). Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
42. Lynch, M. (1982). Closure and disclosure in pre-trial arguments. Human Studies, 5, 285-318.
43. Lynch, M. (1985). Discipline and the material form of images. An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science, 15, 37-66.
44. Lynch, M., & Bogen, D. (1996). The spectacle of history. Speech, text and memory at the Iran-Contra-hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
45. Maynard, D. W. (1985). How children start arguments. Language in Society, 14, 1-29.
46. Maynard, D. W. (1991). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 448-495.
47. McHoul, A. W. (1987). Why there are no guarantees for interrogators. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 455-471.
48. Mondada, L. (2005). "Il faut d'abord ramasser les arguments." La coordination de la parole-en-interaction et de l'inscription dans l'élaboration collective des topics ["First we should pick up the arguments." Coordination of talk-in-interaction and inscription in the collective elaboration of topics]. In R. Bouchard & L. Mondada (Eds.), Les processus de la rédaction collaborative (pp. 131-164). Paris: L'Harmattan.
49. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50. Psathas, G. (1990). The organization of talk, gaze and activity in a medical interview. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 205-230). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
51. Rock, F. (2001). The genesis of a witness statement. Forensic Linguistics, 8, 44-72.
52. Ryave, A. L. ( 1978). On the achievement of a series of stories. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies on the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 113-132). New York: Academic.
53. Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Sacks, H. (1978). Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies on the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 249-269). New York: Academic.
55. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation: I-II. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
56. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
57. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75-119). New York: Free Press.
58. Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?." Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104-152.
59. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement. Some uses of "uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
60. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28-52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1976)
61. Schegloff, E. A. (1988-1989). From interview to confrontation. Observations of the Bush/ Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 215-240.
62. Schegloff, E. A. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51-77). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
63. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101-134). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
64. Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement: III. The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 185-211.
65. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1990). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 31-61). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Original work published 1977)
66. Smith, D. (1974). The social construction of documentary reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257-268.
67. Stefani, G., Levasseur, G., & Bouloc, B. (1993). Procédure pénale [Criminal procedure]. Paris: Dalloz. (Original work published 1964)
68. ten Have, P. (1991). Talk and institutions. A reconsideration of the "asymmetry" of doctor-patient interaction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 138-163). Cambridge, England: Polity.
69. Travers, M. (2001). Ethnométhodologie, analyse de conversation et droit [Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and law]. Droit et Société, 48, 349-366.
70. Travers, M., & Manzo, J. F. (Eds.). (1997). Law in action. Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
71. Turner, R. (1971). Words, utterances and activities. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 169-187). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1970)
72. Turner, R. (1972). Some formal properties of therapy talk. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 367-396). New York: Free Press.
73. Watson, D. R. (1986). Doing the organization's work: An examination of aspects of the operation of a crisis intervention center. In S. Fisher & A. Dundas Todd (Eds.), Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, education and law (pp. 91-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
74. Watson, D. R. (1990). Some features of the elicitation of confessions in murder interrogations. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 263-296). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
75. Watson, D. R. (1995). Some potentialities and pitfalls in the analysis of process and personal change in counselling and therapeutic interaction. In J. Siegfried (Ed.), Therapeutic and everyday discourse as behavior change: Towards a micro-analysis in psychotherapy process research (pp. 301-339). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
76. Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D. H., & Whalen, M. R. (1988). When words fail. A single case analysis. Social Problems, 35, 335-362.
77. Zimmerman, D. H. (1969). Record-keeping and the intake process in a public welfare agency. In S. Wheeler (Ed.), On record: Files and dossiers in American life (pp. 319-354). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
78. Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 418-469). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.