The effects of a joint vocational training programme for general practitioner and occupational health trainees

Medical Education

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 980-986

  Nauta, Noks ^a,b   Weel, André ^b   Overzier, Peter ^c   Von Grumbkow, Jasper ^d  

^a Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine   (Netherlands)

^b Mediforce ^*  (Netherlands)

^c Context GGZ Preventie ^*  (Netherlands)

^d OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Education, medical, continuing *methods; Family practice *education; Interprofessional relations; Netherlands; Questionnaires; Vocational education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ASPECT; STUDENT; TRUST; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

ADULT; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; QUESTIONNAIRES; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

EID: 33748919814     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02564.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Buijs P, van Amstel R, van Dijk F. Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:709-13.
2. Faber E, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Burdorf A, Nauta AP, Hulshof CTJ, Overzier PM, Miedema HS, Koes BW. Training general practitioners and occupational physicians to collaborate does not influence sickness absence of LBP patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:75-82.
3. Beaumont DG. The interaction between general practitioners and occupational health professionals in relation to rehabilitation for work: a Delphi study. Occup Med (Lond) 2003;53:249-53.
4. Murray E. Challenges in educational research [Commentary]. Med Educ 2002;36:110-12.
5. Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 1989;14:532-50.
6. Yin RK, Heald KA. Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies. Admin Sci Q 1975;20:371-81.
7. Yin RK. Case Study Research. Design and Methods, revised edn. Newbury Park: Sage Publications 1989.
8. Nauta AP, Faddegon HC, Peeters JW. Huisartsen en bedrijfsartsen in opleiding leren samenwerken in de praktijk. Tijdschr Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgen 2002;10:116-18.
9. Brown RJ. Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges. Eur J Soc Psychol 2000;30:745-78.
10. Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In: Kramer RM, Tyler TR., eds. Trust in Organizations. London: Sage 1996:114-39.
11. Nauta AP, von Grumbkow J. Factors predicting trust between GPs and OHPs. Int J Integr Care 2001, 1. Available at: http://www.ijic.org/index2.html. [accessed August 2005]
12. Nauta AP, van Amstel RJ, Anema JR, Venema A, Overzier PM, von Grumbkow J. Regional projects to improve collaboration of GPs and OHPs: effects on trust. 2004. Available at: http://www.noksnauta.nl. [accessed August 2005]
13. Nauta AP. Een Vertrouwenskwestie? [A matter of trust]. PhD thesis, Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland 2004.
14. Parsell G, Spalding R, Bligh J. Shared goals, shared learning: evaluation of a multiprofessional course for undergraduate students. Med Educ 1998;32:304-11.
15. Zwarenstein M, Reeves S, Barr H, Hammick M, Koppel I, Atkins J. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;1:CD002213.
16. Parsell G, Bligh J. Interprofessional learning. Postgrad Med J 1998;74:89-95.
17. Weiss SJ, Davis HP. Validity and reliability of the collaborative practice scales. Nurs Res 1985;34:299-305.
18. Zwarenstein M, Reeves S. What's so great about collaboration? We need more evidence and less rhetoric. BMJ 2000;320:1022-3.