The interaction between general practitioners and occupational health professionals in relation to rehabilitation for work: A Delphi study

Occupational Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 249-253

  Beaumont, David G ^a  

^a Business Healthcare   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

General practitioners; Occupational health professionals; Poor communication; Rehabilitation for work

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OCCUPATIONAL PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEAMWORK; TELEPHONE; VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION; WORK DISABILITY;

DELPHI TECHNIQUE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REHABILITATION, VOCATIONAL;

EID: 0037715308     PISSN: 09627480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqg066     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Archibald RM. Letter: Attitude of GPs to occupational health services. J Soc Occup Med 1991;41:188.
2. Beaumont D, Quinlan R. Vocational rehabilitation, case management and occupational health. Occup Med (Lond) 2002;52:293-295.
3. Bowles N. The Delphi technique. Nurs Stand 1999;13:32-36.
4. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurse Stud 2001;38:195-200.
5. Sharkey SB, Sharples AY. An approach to consensus building using the Delphi technique: developing a learning resource in mental health. Nurse Educ Today 2001;21:398-408.
6. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008-1015.
7. Strachan H. Issues for future direction of nursing informatics in the UK: a Delphi study. Inf Tech Nurs 1996;8:11-13.
8. Harrington JM. Research priorities in occupational medicine: a survey in United Kingdom medical opinion by the Delphi technique. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:289-294.
9. Agius RM. Priorities for understanding and managing occupational allergy: a Delphi consensus. Clin Exp Allergy 1993;323:634-637.
10. Macdonald EB, Ritchie KA, Murray KJ, Gilmour WH. Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:98-105.
11. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, et al. Concensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment 1998;2(3).
12. Bagley Thompson C, Schaffer J. Minimum data set development: air transport time-related terms. Int J Med Inf 2002;65:121-133.
13. Pill J. The Delphi method: substance, context, critique and an annotated bibliography. Socioecon Plann Sci 1971;5:57-71.
14. Anema JR, van der Giezen AM, Buijs PC, van Mechelen W. Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: a cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:729-733.
15. Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Pathways to Work: Helping People into Employment. London: DWP, 2002.
16. Buijs P, van Amstel R, van Dijk F. Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:709-713.
17. Parker G. Attitudes of general practitioners to occupation health services. J Soc Occup Med 1991;41:34-36.
18. de Bono AM. Communication between occupational physicians and other medical practitioners - an audit. Occup Med (Lond) 1997,47:349-356.
19. Morgan DR. The general practitioners' view. Occup Med (Lond) 1999;49:403-405.
20. Sawney P. Current issues in fitness for work certification. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:217-222.
21. Beaumont D, Challenor J. Letter: Current issues in fitness for work certification. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:498-499.