An investigation of the effect of temperature and exposure to ultrasound on the de-inking of mixed recoverable office waste

JOCCA - Surface Coatings International

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 322-328

  Thompson, R C ^a   Manning, A ^a   Lane, J ^a  

^a London   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748914854     PISSN: 13560751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02692740     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Thompson RC, The impact of inks and coatings on fibre reclamation. Surface Coatings International, 16, (5), 230-233, 1998.
2. Freeman HS and Sokolowska J, Developments in dyestuff chemistry. Review of Progress in Colouration, 29, 8-22, 1999.
3. Cathie K, Moore GK and Burdett S, Understanding why laser printed papers deink differently. Developments in Wastepaper Technology, Pira Symposium, Gatwick, UK. 17, 1993.
4. Cathie K and Mallouris M, Use of surface energy measurements and other parameters to predict the deinkability of laser printed papers. Second Research Forum in Recycling, Ste-Adele, Canada. 179-199, 1993.
5. Darlington WB, Hai SH and Hipolit KJ, A new process for deinking electrostatic printed secondary fibre. Canadian Pulp and Paper Association Montreal, Canada, 1991.
6. Seifert P, Recent innovations in paper recycling. Tappi Journal, 77, (2), 149-152, 1994.
7. Sharma AK, Forester WK and Shriver EH, Physical and optical properties of steam-exploded laser-printed paper. Tappi Journal, 79, (5), 211-221, 1996.
8. Turai LL and Teng CH, Ultrasonic deinking of waste paper. Tappi Journal, 61, (2), 31-34, 1978.
9. Suslick KS, The chemical effects of ultrasound. Scientific American, 62-68, February 1998.
10. Stephanis CG, Hatiris JG and Mourmouras DE, The process (mechanism) of erosion of soluble brittle materials caused by cavitation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 4, 269-271, 1997.
11. Putterman SJ, Sonoluminescencc: sound into light. Scientific American, (272), 32-37, February 1995.
12. Anson LW and Chivers RC, Thermal effects in the attenuation of ultrasound in dilute suspensions for low values of acoustic radius. Ultrasonics, 28, 16, 1990.
13. Wang D and Sakakibara M, Lactose hydrolysis and β-galactosidase activity in sonicated fermentation with Lactobacillus strains. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 4, 255-261, 1997.
14. Norman JC, Sell NJ and Danelski M, Deinking laser-print paper using ultrasound. Tappi Journal 77, (3), 151-158, 1994.
15. Scott WE and Gerber P, Using ultrasound to deink xerographic waste Tappi Journal, 78, (12), 125-130, 1995.
16. Niemczewski B, A comparison of ultrasonic capitation intensity in liquids. Ultrasonics, 16, 107-110, 1980.
17. Ling TF, The surface and physical properties of toners and their effects on office waste deinking. Progress in Paper Recycling 7, (1), 50-60, 1997.
18. Cathie K and Burdett S, Understanding why laser printed papers deink differently. Pulping Conference Boston, MA, USA. 619-642, 1992.