International preferences for pork appearance: I. Consumer choices

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-36

  Ngapo, T M ^a,b   Martin, J F ^b   Dransfield, E ^a,c  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b FOOD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Choice; Colour; Consumers; Drip; Fat; Marbling; Pork; Preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748912736     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bryhni E.A., Byrne D.V., Rødbotten M., Claudi-Magnussen C., Agerhem H., Johansson M., et al. Consumer perceptions of pork in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Food Quality and Preference 13 (2002) 257-266
2. Cassens R.G. Historical perspectives and current aspects of pork meat quality in the USA. Food Chemistry 69 (2000) 357-363
3. Cho, S., Ngapo, T. M., Dransfield, E., Park, B., Kim, J., Yoo, Y., et al. (2003). Criteria Influencing Choice of Pork Chops by Korean Consumers. In Proceedings 49th international congress of meat science and technology, 31 August-5 September 2003, Campinas, Brazil (pp. 247-248).
4. Cipolli, K. M. V. A., Silveira, E. T. F., Ngapo, T. M., & Dransfield, E. (2003). Consumer preferences of pork chops-the Brazilian survey. In Proceedings 5th Pangborn sensory science symposium. A sensory revolution, 20-24 July 2003, Boston, USA (abstract, p. 187).
5. Dransfield E., Martin J.-F., Miramont J., and Ngapo T.M. Meat appearance: Pork Chops. A tool for surveying consumer preferences (2001), Paris, INRA
6. FAO (2002). FAOSTAT database results. Available from http://apps.fao.org/page/collections.
7. FAPRI (1998). World Agriculture Outlook. The Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA. Available from www.fapri.org.
8. Kauffman R.L., Cassens R.G., Scherer A., and Meeker D.L. Variations in pork quality: History, definition, extent and resolution (1992), National Pork Producers Council, Des Mines, Iowa
9. Melton B.E., Huffman W.E., Shogren J.F., and Fox J.A. Consumer preferences for fresh food items with multiple quality attributes: evidence from an experimental auction of pork chops. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1996) 916-923
10. Mullen J.D., and Wohlgenant M.K. The willingness of consumers to pay for attributes of lamb. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 35 3 (1991) 247-262
11. Murray J.M., Easton K., and Best D.J. A study of Chinese-origin and European-origin Australian consumers' texture preferences using a novel extruded product. Journal of Sensory Studies 16 (2001) 485-504
12. Ngapo T.M., Dransfield E., Martin J.-F., Magnusson M., Bredahl L., and Nute G.R. Consumer perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England, Sweden and Denmark. Meat Science 66 1 (2002) 125-134
13. Ngapo, T. M., Martin, J.-F., & Dransfield, E. (2002). Consumer preferences of pork chops: an international cross-cultural comparison. In Proceedings 48th international congress of meat science and technology, 25-30 August 2002, Rome, Italy (Vol. 1, pp. 150-151).
14. Ngapo T.M., Martin J.-F., and Dransfield E. Consumer choices of pork chops: results from three panels in France. Food Quality and Preference 15 4 (2004) 349-359
15. Ngapo, T. M., Martin, J.-F., & Dransfield, E. (2004b). Consumer preferences of pork chop characteristics: an international cross-cultural comparison. In Proceedings 50th international congress of meat science and technology, 8-13 August 2004, Helsinki, Finland.
16. Ngapo, T. M., Martin, J.-F., & Dransfield, E. (submitted for publication). International preferences for pork appearance. II. Factors influencing consumer choice. Food Quality and Preference.
17. O'Mahony R., Cowan C., and Keane M. Consumer preferences for pork chops with different levels of intramuscular fat. Food Quality and Preference 3 (1991) 229-234
18. Prescott J., Young O., O'Neill L., Yau N.J.N., and Stevens R. Motives for food choice: a comparison of consumers from Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia, and New Zealand. Food Quality and Preference 13 7/8 (2002) 489-495
19. Rozin P. The socio-cultural context of eating and food choice. In: Meiselman H., and MacFie H.J.H. (Eds). Food choice, acceptance and consumption (1996), Blackie, London 83-104
20. SAS (1999). SAS Users Guide: Statistics (Version 8.1). Cary: SAS Institute Inc.
21. Yeh L.L., Kim K.O., Chompreeda P., Rimkeeree H., Yau N.J.N., and Lundahl D.S. Comparison in use of the 9-point hedonic scale between Americans, Chinese, Koreans, and Thai. Food Quality and Preference 9 (1998) 413-419