Pollinator visitation, pollen limitation, and selection on flower size through female function in contrasting habitats within a population of Campanula persicifolia

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 412-420

  Hansen, Vivi Irèn ^a   Totland, Ørjan ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Campanula; Flower size; Flower visitation rate; Phenotypic selection; Pollen limitation

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FRUITS; SEED;

CAMPANULA; FLOWER SIZE; FLOWER VISITATION RATE; PHENOTYPIC SELECTION; POLLEN LIMITATION;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

FLOWERING; LIGHT INTENSITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PATH ANALYSIS; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHENOTYPE; POLLEN LIMITATION; POLLINATOR; SEED PRODUCTION;

FLOWERS; FRUITS; PLANTS; SEEDS;

CAMPANULA; CAMPANULA PERSICIFOLIA; CAMPANULACEAE;

EID: 33748905331     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B06-012     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anthony, K.R., and Hoegh-Guldberg, O. 2003. Variation in coral photosynthesis, respiration and growth characteristics in contrasting light microhabitats: an analogue to plants in forest gaps and understoreys? Funct. Ecol. 17: 246-259. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00731.x.
2. Ashman, T.-L., and Diefenderfer, C. 2001. Sex ratio represents a unique context for selection on attractive traits: consequences for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Am. Nat. 157: 334-347. doi:10.1086/319192.
3. Ashman, T.-L., and Morgan, M.T. 2004. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Science, 271: 553-559.
4. Ashman, T.-L., Knight, T.M., Steels, J.A., Amarasekare, P., Burd, M., Campbell, D.R., Dudash, M.R., Johnston, M.O., Mazer, S.J., Mitchell, R.J., Morgan, M.T., and Wilson, W.G. 2004. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology, 85: 2408-2421.
5. Bateman, A.J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2: 349-368.
6. Bell, G., and Lechowicz, M.J. 1991. The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. I. Environmental heterogeneity measured by explant trials. J. Ecol. 79: 663-685.
7. Burd, M. 1994. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev. 60: 83-139.
8. Campbell, D.R., and Halama, K.J. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology, 74: 1043-1051.
9. Campbell, D.R., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., Lynch, E.A., and Mitchell, R.J. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: Pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution, 45: 1458-1467.
10. Cresswell, J.E., and Galen, C. 1991. Frequency-dependent selection and adaptive surfaces for floral character combinations: the pollination of Polemonium viscosum. Am. Nat. 138: 1342-1353. doi:10.1086/285290.
11. Cresswell, J.E., and Robertson, A.W. 1994. Discrimination by pollen-collecting bumblebees among differentially rewarding flowers of an alpine wildflower, Campanula rotundifolia (Campanulaceae). Oikos, 69: 304-308.
12. Diamantopoulos, A., and Siguaw, J.A. 2000. Introducing LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated. Sage publications, London.
13. Dudash, M.R. 1993. Variation in pollen limitation among individuals of Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology, 74: 959-962.
14. Elle, E., and Carney, R. 2003. Reproductive assurance varies with flower size in Collinsia parviflora (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90: 888-896.
15. Fox, J.F. 1992. Pollen limitation of reproductive effort in willows. Oecologia, 90: 283-287.
16. Galen, C., and Newport, M.E.A. 1987. Bumble bee behaviour and selection on flower size in the sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia. 74: 20-23. doi:10.1007/BF00377340.
17. Galen, C., and Stanton, M.L. 1989. Bumble bee pollination and floral morphology: factors influencing pollen dispersal in the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 76: 419-426.
18. Gügerli, F. 1998. Effect of elevation on sexual reproduction in alpine populations of Saxifraga oppositifolia (Saxifragaceae). Oecologia, 114: 60-66. doi:10.1007/s004420050420.
19. Haig, D., and Westoby, M. 1988. On limits to seed production. Am. Nat. 131: 757-759. doi:10.1086/284817.
20. Hainsworth, F.R., Wolf, L.L., and Mercier, T. 1985. Pollen limitation in a monocarpic species, Ipomopsis aggregata. J. Ecol. 73: 263-270.
21. He, W.M., and Dong, M. 2003. Physiological acclimation and growth response to partial shading in Salix matsudana in the Mu Us Sandland in China. Trees (Berl.), 17: 87-93.
22. Herrera, C.M. 1995. Microclimate and individual variation in pollinators: flowering plants are more than their flowers. Ecology. 76: 1516-1524.
23. Herrera, C.M. 1997. Thermal biology and foraging responses of insect pollinators to the forest floor irradiance mosaic. Oikos, 78: 601-611.
24. Inoue, K., Maki, M., and Masuda, M. 1995. Different responses of pollinating bees to size variation and sexual phases in flowers of Campanula. Ecol. Res. 10: 267-273. doi:10.1007/BF02347852.
25. Johnson, S.G., Delph, L.F., and Elderkin, C.L. 1995. The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor behavior in Campanula americana. Oecologia, 102: 174-179. doi:10.1007/BF00333249.
26. Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D. 2004. LISREL 8.71 student edition (October 2004). Scientific Software International, Inc., Lincolnwood, Ill.
27. Kelloway, E.K. 1998. Using LISREL for structural equation modelling - a researcher's guide. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks. Calif.
28. Kingsolver, J.G., and Schemske, D.W. 1991. Path analysis of selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 276-280. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90004-H.
29. Lande, R., and Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution, 37: 1210-1226.
30. Larson, B.M.H., and Barrett, S.C.H. 2000. A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 503-520. doi:10.1006/bijl.1999.0372.
31. Lechowicz, G.M., and Bell, G. 1991. The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. II. Microspatial heterogeneity of the edaphic environment. J. Ecol. 79: 687-696.
32. Li, C.C. 1975. Path analysis - a primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, Calif.
33. Lundberg, H. 1980. Effects of weather in foraging-flights of bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in a subalpine/alpine area. Holarct. Ecol. 3: 104-110.
34. Mitchell, R.J. 1992. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modelling. Funct. Ecol. 6: 123-129.
35. Mitchell, R.J. 1994. Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. Am. Nat. 143: 870-889. doi:10.1086/285637.
36. nd ed. Edited by S.M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 217-234.
37. Murcia, C. 1990. Effect of floral morphology and temperature on pollen receipt and removal in Ipomoea trichocarpa. Ecology, 71: 1098-1109.
38. Nicotra, A.B., Chazdon, R.L., and Iriarte, V.B. 1999. Spatial heterogeneity of light and woody seedling regeneration in tropical wet forests. Ecology, 80: 1908-1926.
39. Nyman, Y. 1992. Pollination mechanisms in six Campanula species (Campanulaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 181: 97-108. doi:10.1007/BF00937589.
40. Parker, I.M. 1997. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (scotch broom), an invasive shrub. Ecology, 78: 1457-1470.
41. Rausher, M.D. 1992. The measurements of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariance between traits and fitness. Evolution, 46: 616-626.
42. Robertson, G.P., Huston, M.A., Evans, F.C., and Tiedje, J.M. 1988. Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology, 69: 1517-1524.
43. Scheiner, S.M., Mitchell, R.J., and Callahan, H.S. 2000. Using path analysis to measure selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 423-433. doi:10.1046/j.1420- 9101.2000.00191.x.
44. Shipley, B. 2000. Cause and correlation in biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
45. Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
46. Totland, Ø. 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology, 82: 2233-2244.
47. Totland, Ø., Andersen, H.L., Bjelland, T., Dahl, V., Eide, W., Houge, S., Pedersen, T.R., and Vie, E.U. 1998. Variation in pollen limitation among plants and phenotypic selection on floral traits in an early-spring flowering herb. Oikos, 82: 491-501.
48. Wilson, P., Thomson, J.D., Stanton, M.L., and Rigney, L.P. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination traits. Am. Nat. 143: 283-296. doi:10.1086/285604.
49. Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 10: 557-585.
50. Zimmerman, M., and Pyke, G.H. 1988. Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am. Nat. 131: 723-738.