Phylogenetic relationships within Cicuta (Apiaceae tribe Oenantheae) inferred from nuclear rDNA ITS and cpDNA sequence data

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 453-468

  Lee, Chang Shook ^a,b   Downie, Stephen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Apiaceae; Chloroplast DNA; Cicuta; Nuclear rDNA ITS; Oenanthe; Oenantheae; psbI; psbK; rps16 intron; trnK; trnQ

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA SEQUENCES; GENES; PLANTS (BOTANY);

APIACEAE; CHLOROPLAST DNA; CICUTA; NUCLEAR RDNA ITS; OENANTHE; OENANTHEAE; PSBI; PSBK; RPS16 INTRON; TRNQ;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ANGIOSPERM; CHLOROPLAST; DATA SET; DNA; GENE EXPRESSION; HERB; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

CHLOROPHYLLS; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PLANTS; PLASTIDS;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

APIACEAE; APIALES; CICUTA; CICUTA BULBIFERA; CICUTA DOUGLASII; CICUTA MACULATA; CICUTA MACULATA VAR. ANGUSTIFOLIA; CICUTA MACULATA VAR. BOLANDERI; CICUTA VIROSA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; OENANTHE (ANGIOSPERM); OENANTHEAE;

EID: 33748894321     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B06-016     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Álvarez, I., and Wendel, J.F. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29: 417-434.
2. Barker, F.K., and Lutzoni, F.M. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51: 625-637. doi:10.1080/10635150290102302.
3. Bell, C.R., and Constance, L. 1957. Chromosome numbers in Umbelliferae. Am. J. Bot. 44: 565-572.
4. Bell, C.R., and Constance, L. 1960. Chromosome numbers in Umbelliferae. II. Am. J. Bot. 47: 24-32.
5. Bell, C.R., and Kane, R. 1981. An anomalous rhizomatous population of Cicuta maculata L. at Mountain Lake, Virginia. Castanea, 46: 4-7.
6. Bomhard, M.L. 1936. Leaf venation as a means of distinguishing Cicuta from Angelica. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 26: 102-107.
7. Constance, L. 1972. Patterns in the distribution of Japanese-American Umbelliferae. In Floristics and paleofloristics of Asia and Eastern North America. Edited by A. Graham. Elsevier, New York. pp. 93-99.
8. Constance, L. 1993. Apiaceae. In The Jepson manual. Higher plants of California. Edited by J.C. Hickman. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif. pp. 136-166.
9. Constance, L., Chuang, T.-I., and Bell, C.R. 1976. Chromosome numbers in Umbelliferae. V. Am. J. Bot. 63: 608-625.
10. Coulter, J.M., and Rose, J.N. 1888. Revision of North American Umbelliferae. Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Ind. pp. 1-144.
11. Coulter, J.M., and Rose, J.N. 1900. Monograph of the North American Umbelliferae. Contrib. U.S. Natl. Herb. 7: 1-256.
12. Cronquist, A. 1961. Umbelliferae. In Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Edited by C.L. Hitchcock, A. Cronquist, M. Ownbey, and J.W. Thompson. Univ. Washington Publ. Biol., Vol. 17. pp. 506-586.
13. Cronquist, A. 1997. Apiaceae, the carrot family. In Intermountain flora: vascular plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 3, part A. Edited by A. Cronquist, N.H. Holmgren, and P.K. Holmgren. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N.Y.
14. Downie, S.R., and Katz-Downie, D.S. 1996. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Am. J. Bot. 83: 234-251.
15. Downie, S.R., and Katz-Downie, D.S. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast rps16 intron sequences reveals relationships within the woody southern African Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae. Can. J. Bot. 77: 1120-1135. doi:10.1139/cjb-77-8-1120.
16. Downie, S.R., Katz-Downie, D.S., and Cho, K.-J. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae using nucleotide sequences from the chloroplast rpoC1 intron. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6: 1-18.
17. Downie, S.R., Ramanath, S., Katz-Downie, D.S., and Llanas, E. 1998. Molecular systematics of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer and plastid rpoC1 intron sequences. Am. J. Bot. 85: 563-591.
18. Downie, S.R., Katz-Downie, D.S., and Spalik, K. 2000a. A phylogeny of Apiaceae tribe Scandiceae: evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Am. J. Bot. 87: 76-95.
19. Downie, S.R., Katz-Downie, D.S., and Watson, M.F. 2000b. A phylogeny of the flowering plant family Apiaceae based on chloroplast DNA rpl16 and rpoC1 intron sequences: towards a suprageneric classification of subfamily Apioideae. Am. J. Bot. 87: 273-292.
20. Downie, S.R., Watson, M.F., Spalik, K., and Katz-Downie, D.S. 2000c. Molecular systematics of Old World Apioideae (Apiaceae): relationships among some members of tribe Peucedaneae sensu lato, the placement of several island-endemic species, and resolution within the apioid superclade. Can. J. Bot. 78: 506-528. doi:10.1139/cjb-78-4-506.
21. Downie, S.R., Plunkett, G.M., Watson, M.F., Spalik, K., Katz-Downie, D.S., Valiejo-Roman, C.M., Terentieva, E.I., Troitsky, A.V., Lee, B.-Y., Lahham, J., and El-Oqlah, A. 2001. Tribes and clades within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: the contribution of molecular data. Edinb. J. Bot. 58: 301-330. doi:10.1017/S0960428601000658.
22. Downie, S.R., Sun, F.-J., Katz-Downie, D.S., and Colletti, G.J. 2004. A phylogenetic study of Perideridia (Apiaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 29: 737-751.
23. Doyle, J.J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17: 144-163.
24. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, M., Kluge, A.G., and Bult, C. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics, 10: 315-319.
25. Greene, E.L. 1889. Vegetative characters of the species of Cicuta. Pittonia, 2: 1-11.
26. Greene, E.L. 1909. New plants from Arizona. Leafl. Bot. Obsn. Crit. 2: 20-24.
27. Greene, E.L. 1912. New species of Cicuta. Leafl. Bot. Obsn. Crit. 2: 236-241.
28. Hardway, T.M., Spalik, K., Watson, M.F., Katz-Downie, D.S., and Downie, S.R. 2004. Circumscription of Apiaceae tribe Oenantheae. S. Afr. J. Bot. 70: 393-406.
29. Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H., and Barnett, L.C. 1990. Index herbariorum. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N.Y.
30. Jacobson, C.A. 1915. Water hemlock (Cicuta). Agricultural Experiment Station, The University of Nevada, Reno, Nev. Technical Bulletin No. 81. pp. 7-46.
31. James, L.F., and Ralphs, M.H. 1986. Water hemlock. Utah Sci. 47: 67-69.
32. Jepson, W.L. 1936. A flora of California. Vol. 2. University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
33. Kelchner, S.A. 2002. Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints. Am. J. Bot. 89: 1651-1669.
34. Kingsbury, J.M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the United States and Canada. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
35. Learn, G.H., Jr., Shore, J.S.. Furnier, G.R., Zurawski, G., and Clegg, M.T. 1992. Constraints on the evolution of plastid introns: the group II intron in the gene encoding tRNA-Val(UAC). Mol. Biol. Evol. 9: 856-871.
36. Lee, B.-Y., and Downie, S.R. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae tribe Caucalideae and related taxa: inferences based on ITS sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24: 461-479.
37. Lunell, J. 1916. The vascular plants of North Dakota. VIII. Am. Midl. Nat. 4: 467-487.
38. Mathias, M.E., and Constance, L. 1942. A synopsis of the American species of Cicuta. Madroño, 6: 145-176.
39. Mathias, M.E., and Constance, L. 1944. Cicuta. In North American flora. Vol. 28B. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, N.Y. pp. 154-157.
40. Michel, F., Umesono, K., and Ozeki, H. 1989. Comparative and functional anatomy of group II catalytic introns - a review. Gene, 82: 5-30. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(89)90026-7.
41. Mulligan, G.A. 1980. The genus Cicuta in North America. Can. J. Bot. 58: 1755-1767.
42. Mulligan, G.A., and Munro, D.B. 1981. The biology of Canadian weeds. 48. Cicuta maculata L., C. douglasii (DC.) Coult. & Rose and C. virosa L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61: 93-105.
43. Panter, K.E., Keeler, R.F., and Baker, D.C. 1988. Toxicoses in livestock from the hemlocks (Conium and Cicuta spp.). J. Anim. Sci. 66: 2407-2413.
44. Plunkett, G.M., and Downie, S.R. 1999. Major lineages within Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: a comparison of chloroplast restriction site and DNA sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 86: 1014-1026.
45. Popp, M., Erixon, P., Eggens, F., and Oxelman, B. 2005. Origin and evolution of a circumpolar polyploid species complex in Silene (Caryophyllaceae) inferred from low copy nuclear RNA polymerase introns, rDNA, and chloroplast DNA. Syst. Bot. 30: 302-313.
46. Posada, D., and Buckley, T.R. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53: 793-808. doi:10.1080/10635150490522304.
47. Posada, D., and Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817.
48. Rieseberg, L.H., and Brunsfeld, S.J. 1992. Molecular evidence and plant introgression. In Molecular systematics of plants. Edited by P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis, and J.J. Doyle. Chapman and Hall, New York. pp. 151-176.
49. Ronquist, F., and Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572-1574. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
50. Sang, T. 2002. Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 37: 121-147. doi:10.1080/ 10409230290771474.
51. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E., and Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 92: 142-166.
52. Shinozaki, K., Ohme, M., Tanaka, M., Wakasugi, T., Hayashida, N., Matsubayashi, T., Zaita, N., Chunwongse, J., Obokata, J., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Ohio, C. Torazawa, K., Meng, B.-Y., Sugita, M., Deno, H., Kamagoshira, T., Yamada, K., Kusuda, J., Takaiwa, F., Kato, A., Tohdoh, N., Shimada, H., and Sugiura, M. 1986. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its organization and expression. EMBO J. 5: 2043-2049.
53. Smedmark, J.E.E., and Eriksson, T. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Geum (Rosaceae) and relatives inferred from the nrITS and trnL-trnF regions. Syst. Bot. 27: 303-317.
54. Soltis, D.E., and Kuzoff, R.K. 1995. Discordance between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies in the Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae). Evolution, 49: 727-742.
55. Soltis, D.E., and Soltis, P.S. 1999. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 348-352. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99) 01638-9.
56. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., and Tate, J.A. 2003. Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant Speciation. New Phytol. 161: 173-191.
57. Soltis, P.S., Doyle, J.J., and Soltis, D.E. 1992. Molecular data and polyploid evolution in plants. In Molecular systematics of plants. Edited by P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis, and J.J. Doyle. Chapman and Hall, New York. pp. 177-201.
58. Starreveld, E., and Hope, C.E. 1975. Cicutoxin poisoning (water hemlock). Neurology, 25: 730-734.
59. Sun, F.-J., Downie, S.R., and Hartman, R.L. 2004. An ITS-based phylogenetic analysis of the perennial, endemic Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae of western North America. Syst. Bot. 29: 419-431.
60. Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4 edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
61. Tamura, K., and Nei, M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 512-526.
62. Vargas, P., McAllister, H.A., Morton, C., Jury, S.L., and Wilkinson, M.J. 1999. Polyploid speciation in Hedera (Araliaceae): phylogenetic and biogeographic insights based on chromosome counts and ITS sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 219: 165-179. doi:10.1007/BF00985577.
63. Wendel, J.F., Schnabel, A., and Seelanan, T. 1995. Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following polyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92: 280-284.
64. Yoder, A.D., Irwin, J.A., and Payseur, B.A. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50: 408-424. doi:10.1080/106351501300318003.