Public dialogue on healthcare prioritisation

Health Policy

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 107-116

  Rosén, Per ^a  

^a Hälso och sjukvårdsledningen ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Deliberative democracy; Health care rationing; Priority setting; Public dialogue

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PEER GROUP; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; POLITICAL SYSTEM; POPULATION; PUBLIC FIGURE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; PUBLIC SPEAKING; RESIDENT; TAX;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; FOCUS GROUPS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PAMPHLETS; PATERNALISM; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL VALUES; SWEDEN;

EID: 33748890271     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ham C., and Robert G. Reasonable rationing (2003), Open University Press, Maidenhead
2. Baumol W. Health care as a handicraft industry (1995), Office of Health Economic, London
3. Hunter D. Rationing dilemmas in health care. Research Paper No. 8. Birmingham: National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts; 1993.
4. Hunter D. Desperately seeking solutions. Rationing health care (1997), Longman, London
5. Klein R., Day P., and Redmayne S. Managing scarcity (1996), Open University Press, Buckingham
6. Lomas J. Reluctant rationers: public input to health care priorities. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 2 2 (1997) 104
7. Rawls J. A theory of justice (1972), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Tymstra T., and Andela M. Opinions of Dutch physicians, nurses and citizens on health care policy, rationing and technology. Journal of American Medical Association 270 24 (1993) 2995-2999
9. Bowling A., Jacobson B., and Southgate L. Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Social Science and Medicine 37 (1993) 851-857
10. Neuberger J., Adams D., MacMaster P., Maidment A., and Speed M. Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: survey of public and clinicians. British Medical Journal 317 (1998) 172-175
11. Rosén P. Attitudes to prioritisation in health services. The views of public, patients, health care politicians, personnel, and administrators (2002), NHV, Göteborg
12. Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys. The total design method (1978), Wiley, New York
13. Schuman H., and Presser S. Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on questioning form, wording and context (1996), Academic Press, New York
14. SOM-Institutet. Samhälle, opinion, massmedia. Västra Götaland 2002. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet; 2003.
15. Eagly A., and Chaiken S. Psychology of attitudes (1993), Harcourt Brace & Company, Orlando
16. Mossialos E., and King D. Citizens and rationing: analysis of a European survey. Health Policy 49 (1999) 75-135
17. Kneeshaw J. What does the public think about rationing?-a review of the evidence. In: New B. (Ed). Rationing. Talk and action in health care (1997), Kings Fund, London
18. Rosén P., and Karlberg I. Opinions of Swedish citizens, health-care politicians, administrators, and doctors on rationing and health-care financing. Health Expectations 5 2 (2002) 148-155
19. Pratkanis A., Breckler S., and Greenwald A. Attitude, structure and function (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
20. Lamb D. Priorities in health care: reply to Lewis and Charny. Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1989) 33-34
21. Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. British Medical Journal 312 (1996) 670-674
22. Olsen J.A., Dolan P., Richardson J., and Menzel P. The moral relevance of personal characteristics in setting health care priorities. Paper for the 21st Nordic Health Economists' Study Group meeting in Lund. Sweden, August 25-26 (2000)
23. Kendall L. The future patient (2001), IPPR, London
24. Engelhardt Jr. H.T., and Wildes K.W. The four principles of health care ethics and post-modernity: why a libertarian interpretation is unavoidable. In: Gillon R. (Ed). Principles of health care ethics (1994), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
25. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness in private and public health insurance. In: Coulter A., and Ham C. (Eds). The global challenge of health care rationing (2000), Open University Press, Buckingham
26. WHO. European health care reform. In: Saltman R., and Figueras J. (Eds). Analysis of current strategies (1997), WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen
27. Coulter A., and Ham C. The global challenge of health care rationing (2000), Open University Press, Buckingham
28. Luskin R.C., Fishkin J.S., and Jowell R. Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 32 (2002) 455-487