Opinions of Swedish citizens, health-care politicians, administrators and doctors on rationing and health-care financing

Health Expectations

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 148-155

  Rosén, Per ^a   Karlberg, Ingvar ^a  

^a Namndens Kansli   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Administrators; Citizens; Doctors; Health care politicians; Rationing; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EXPECTATION; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RANDOMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESPONSIBILITY; SWEDEN;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH FACILITY ADMINISTRATORS; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS; PUBLIC OPINION; SWEDEN;

EID: 0036268086     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00169.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Priority setting in health care: Learning from international experience
2. Maximising the health of the whole community
3. Citizens and rationing: Analysis of a European survey
4. Priority-setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway
5. Health care priority setting: A survey of doctors, managers and the general public
6. Opinions of Dutch physicians, nurses and citizens on health care policy, rationing and technology
7. Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district
8. Health care rationing: The public's debate
9. Assessing priorities for allocation of donor liver grafts: Survey of public and clinicians
10. Patient views on choice and participation in primary health care
11. What does the public think about rationing? - A review of the evidence
12. Rationing health care: An exploration
13. Accountability for reasonableness in private and public health insurance