PCR-based sensitive and specific detection of Pectobacterium atrosepticum using primers based on Rhs family gene sequences

Plant Pathology

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 625-629

  Park, D S ^a   Shim, J K ^a   Kim, J S ^a   Kim, B Y ^a   Kang, M J ^a   Seol, Y J ^a   Hahn, J H ^a   Shrestha, R ^b   Lim, C K ^b   Go, S J ^a   Kim, H G ^c  

^a National Institute of Animal Science   (South Korea)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

^c Chungnam National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Blackleg; PCR detection; Pectobacterium atrosepticum; Potato; Rhs family gene

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DISEASE; BACTERIUM; DNA; FUNGUS; GENE EXPRESSION; INOCULATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POTATO;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; FUNGI; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM; PECTOBACTERIUM; PECTOBACTERIUM ATROSEPTICUM; PSEUDOMONAS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; XANTHOMONAS;

EID: 33748799129     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: 13653059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01434.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alvarez AM, Lou K, 1985. Rapid identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris by ELISA. Plant Disease 69, 1082-6.
2. Atlas RM, 2004. Handbook of Microbiological Media, 3rd edn. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
3. Bassam BJ, Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff PM, 1992. DNA amplification fingerprinting of bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 38, 70-6.
4. Chitarra LG, Langerak CJ, Bergervoet JHW, van den Bulk RW, 2002. Detection of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in seed extracts of Brassica spp. Applying fluorescent antibodies and flow cytometry. Cytometry 47, 118-26.
5. Darrasse A, Kotoujanski A, Bertheau Y, 1994. Isolation by genomic subtraction of DNA probes specific for Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica. Applied and Environmental. Microbiology 60, 298-306.
6. De Boer SH, Verdonck LH, Vruggink P, Harju Bang HO, De Ley J, 1987. Serological and biochemical variation among potato strains of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and their taxonomic relationship to other E. carotovora strains. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 63, 487-95.
7. Hélias V, Le Roux AC, Bertheau Y, Andrivon D, Gauthier JP, Jouan B, 1998. Characterisation of Erwinia subspecies and detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica in potato plants, soil and water extracts with PCR-based methods. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104, 685-99.
8. Kang HW, Kwon SW, Go SJ, 2003. PCR-based specific and sensitive detection of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum by primers generated from a URP-PCR fingerprinting-derived polymorphic band. Plant Pathology 52, 127-33.
9. Klopmeyer MJ, Kelman A, 1988. Use of monoclonal antibodies specific for pectate lyase as serological probes in the identification of soft rot Erwinia spp. Phytopathology 78, 1430-4.
10. Murray MG, Thompson WF, 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular-weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 8, 4321.
11. Pérombelon MCM, 2002. Potato diseases caused by soft rot erwinias: an overview of pathogenesis. Plant Pathology 51, 1-12.
12. Rasmussen OF, Reeves JC, 1992. DNA probes for the detection of plant pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Biotechnology 25, 203-20.
13. Sadosky AB, Gray JA, Hill CW, 1991. The RhsD-E subfamily of Escherichia coli K-12. Nucleic Acids Research 19, 7177-83.
14. Schierwater B, Ender A, 1993. Different thermostable DNA polymerases may amplify different RAPD products. Nucleic Acids Research 21, 4647-8.
15. Ward LJ, De Boer SH, 1994. Specific detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica with a digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe. Phytopathology 84, 180-6.
16. van der Wolf JM, Hyman LJ, Jones DAC, Grevesse C, Van Beckhoven JR, van Vuurde JW, Pérombelon MC, 1996. Immunomagnetic separation of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica from potato peel extracts to improve detection sensitivity on a crystal violet pectate medium or by PCR. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 80, 487-95.