Detection of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. Campestris in seed extracts of Brassica sp. Applying fluorescent antibodies and flow cytometry

Cytometry

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 118-126

  Chitarra, L G ^a   Langerak, C J ^a   Bergervoet, J H W ^a   van den Bulk, R W ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCEIN ISOTHIOCYANATE; MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY; PLANT EXTRACT;

BRASSICA; CHEMISTRY; DOSE RESPONSE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; IMMUNOLOGY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT SEED; PROCEDURES; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; STAINING; XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS;

ANTIBODIES, MONOCLONAL; BRASSICA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, IMMUNOLOGIC; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCEIN-5-ISOTHIOCYANATE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; PLANT DISEASES; PLANT EXTRACTS; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; SEEDS; STAINING AND LABELING; XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS;

EID: 33748708403     PISSN: 01964763     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.10058     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. 1 Williams PH. Black rot: a continuing threat to world crucifers. Plant Disease 1980 ; 64: 736–742.
2. 2 Schaad NW. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in crucifers. In: Saettler AW, Schaad NW, Roth DA, editors. Detection of bacteria in seed and other planting material. St. Paul, MN: The American Phytopathological Society ; 1989. p 68–75.
3. 3 Muirhead KA, Horan PK, Poste G. Flow cytometry: present and future. Biotechnology 1985 ; 3: 337–356.
4. 4 Pinder AC, Purdy PW, Poulter SAG, Clark DC. Validation of flow cytometry for a rapid enumeration of bacterial concentrations in pure cultures. J Appl Bacteriol 1990 ; 69: 92–100.
5. 5 Page S, Burns RG. Flow cytometry as a means of enumerating bacteria introduced into soil. Soil Biol Biochem 1991 ; 23: 1025–1028.
6. 6 Diaper JP, Edwards C, Stewart‐Tull DES, Sussman M. The detection of bacteria in aquatic environments by flow cytometry. The release of genetically modified microorganisms: REGEM 2. Proceedings of a symposium held under the auspices of the Federation of European Microbiological Societies, August 29–31, 1991, Nottingham, UK, 1992. p 233–234.
7. 7 Li H, Walker DH. Characterization of rickettsial attachment to host cells by flow cytometry. Infect Immun 1992 ; 60: 2031–2035.
8. 8 May JD, Branton SL, Pruett S, Ainsworth AJ. Differentiation of two strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum with monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry. Avian Dis 1994 ; 38: 542–547.
9. 9 Porter J, Edwards C, Morgan AW, Pickup RW. Rapid, automated separation of specific bacteria from lake water and sewage by flow cytometry and cell sorting. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993 ; 59: 3327–3333.
10. 10 McClelland RG, Pinder AC. Detection of low levels of specific Salmonella species by fluorescent antibodies and flow cytometry. J Appl Bacteriol 1994 ; 77: 440–447.
11. 11 McClelland RG, Pinder AC. Detection of Salmonella typhimurium in dairy products with flow cytometry and monoclonal antibodies. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994 ; 60: 4255–4262.
12. 12 Pinder AC, McClelland RG. Rapid assay for pathogenic Salmonella organisms by immunofluorescence flow cytometry. J Microsc 1994 ; 176: 17–22.
13. 13 Kusunoki H, Kobayashi K, Kita T, Tajima T, Sugii S, Uemura T. Analysis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli serotype 0157: H7 by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies. J Vet Med Sci 1998 ; 60: 1315–1319.
14. 14 Franken AAJM. Application of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for the detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in crucifer seeds using immunofluorescence microscopy. Neth J Plant Pathol 1992 ; 98: 95–106.
15. 15 Randhawa PS, Schaad NW. Selective isolation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris from crucifer seeds. Phytopathology 1984 ; 74: 268–272.
16. 16 Schaad NW. Initial identification of common genera. In: Schaad NW, editor. Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. St. Paul, MN: The American Phytopathological Society ; 1988. p 1–15.
17. 17 Van Vuurde JWL, Kastelein P, Van der Wolf JM. Immunofluorescence colony‐staining (IFC) as a concept for bacterial and ecological research. EPPO Bull 1995 ; 25: 157–162.
18. 18 Schaad NW, Donaldson RC. Comparison of two methods for detection of Xanthomonas campestris in crucifer seeds. Seed Sci Technol 1980 ; 8: 383–391.
19. 19 Van Vuurde JWL. Immunofluorescence colony‐staining as a tool for sample indexing and for the determination of field thresholds for pathogenic seedborne bacteria In: Hutchins JD, Reeves JC, editors. Seed health testing progress towards the 21th century. Cambridge, UK: 1997. p 165–173.